Tex. Codes » Occupations Code · TITLE 3. HEALTH PROFESSIONS · SUBTITLE C. OTHER PROFESSIONS PERFORMING MEDICAL PROCEDURES · CHAPTER 201. CHIROPRACTORS
Texas Codes

Tex. Occ. Code § 201.154 (2026)

Certification For Manipulation Under Anesthesia Prohibited

✓ laws through the 89th Legislature (2025)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov Justiaon Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Sec. 201.154. CERTIFICATION FOR MANIPULATION UNDER ANESTHESIA PROHIBITED. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the board may not adopt a process to certify chiropractors to perform manipulation under anesthesia.

Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 388, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12 cases, 2008–2015 · leading case: Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. Texas Med. Ass'n, 375 S.W.3d 464 (Tex. App.—Austin 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. Texas Med. Ass'n, 375 S.W.3d 464 (Tex. App.—Austin 2012). · cites it 2× “” See Tex. Occ.Code Ann. § 201.154. Second, the Physician Parties urged that MUA was a “surgical” procedure excluded from the scope of chiropractic.”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. Texas Med. Ass'n, 270 S.W.3d 777 (Tex. App.—Austin 2008). “” Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.154 (West 2004).”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. Texas Med. Ass'n, No. 03-10-00673-CV (Tex. App.—Austin July 6, 2012). · cites it 2× “" See Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.154 . Second, the Physician Parties urged that MUA was a "surgical" procedure excluded from the scope of chiropractic.”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. Texas Med. Ass'n, No. 03-10-00673-CV (Tex. App.—Austin July 6, 2012). · cites it 2× “” See Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.154 . Second, the Physician Parties urged that MUA was a “surgical” procedure excluded from the scope of chiropractic.”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. Texas Med. Ass'n, No. 03-10-00673-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Apr. 5, 2012). · cites it 2× “” See Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.154 . Second, the Physician Parties urged that MUA was a “surgical” procedure excluded from the scope of chiropractic.”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. Texas Med. Ass'n, No. 03-10-00673-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Apr. 5, 2012). · cites it 2× “" See Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.154 . Second, the Physician Parties urged that MUA was a "surgical" procedure excluded from the scope of chiropractic.”
Texas State Bd. of Veterinary Med. Examiners v. Ellen Jefferson, No. 03-14-00774-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 28, 2015). · cites it 2× “In this regard, they relied on the definition or description of “surgical procedure” added by the Legislature in 2005: “ ‘[s]urgical procedure’ includes a procedure described in the surgery section of the common procedure coding system as adopted by the Centers for Medicare and…”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners & Glenn Parker v. Texas Med. Ass'n & Texas Med. Bd., No. 03-08-00058-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 26, 2008). “The TMA also alleged that the rule conflicted with section 201.154 of the Act, which provides, "Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the board may not adopt a process to certify chiropractors to perform manipulation under anesthesia.”
Charles Monroe Waller v. State, No. 03-08-00328-CR (Tex. App.—Austin Nov. 26, 2008). “” Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.154 (West 2004).”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners & Glenn Parker v. Texas Med. Ass'n & Texas Med. Bd., No. 03-08-00058-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 15, 2008). “The TMA also alleged that the rule conflicted with section 201.154 of the Act, which provides, "Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the board may not adopt a process to certify chiropractors to perform manipulation under anesthesia.”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners & Glenn Parker v. Texas Med. Ass'n & Texas Med. Bd., No. 03-08-00058-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 15, 2008). “” Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.154 (West 2004).”
Texas Ass'n of Acupuncture & Oriental Med. v. Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners & Patricia Gilbert, No. 03-15-00262-CV (Tex. App.—Austin Aug. 10, 2015). “” See Tex. Occ.Code Ann. § 201.154. Second, the use of a needle.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.