Texas Codes
Tex. Occ. Code § 201.154 (2026)
Certification For Manipulation Under Anesthesia Prohibited
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
TX-LEGstatutes.capitol.texas.gov
Justiaon Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Sec. 201.154. CERTIFICATION FOR MANIPULATION UNDER ANESTHESIA PROHIBITED. Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the board may not adopt a process to certify chiropractors to perform manipulation under anesthesia.
Acts 1999, 76th Leg., ch. 388, Sec. 1, eff. Sept. 1, 1999.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 12
cases, 2008–2015 · leading case: Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. Texas Med. Ass'n, 375 S.W.3d 464 (Tex. App. 2012).
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. Texas Med. Ass'n, 375 S.W.3d 464 (Tex. App. 2012). “” See Tex. Occ.Code Ann. § 201.154. Second, the Physician Parties urged that MUA was a “surgical” procedure excluded from the scope of chiropractic.”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners v. Texas Med. Ass'n, 270 S.W.3d 777 (Tex. App. 2008). “” Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.154 (West 2004).”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners, Glenn Parker, Exec. Dir., & Texas Chiropractic Ass'n v. Texas Med. Ass'n, Texas Med. Bd., & the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2012). “" See Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.154 . Second, the Physician Parties urged that MUA was a "surgical" procedure excluded from the scope of chiropractic.”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners, Glenn Parker, Exec. Dir., & Texas Chiropractic Ass'n v. Texas Med. Ass'n, Texas Med. Bd., & the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2012). “” See Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.154 . Second, the Physician Parties urged that MUA was a “surgical” procedure excluded from the scope of chiropractic.”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners, Glenn Parker, Exec. Dir., & Texas Chiropractic Ass'n v. Texas Med. Ass'n, Texas Med. Bd., & the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2012). “” See Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.154 . Second, the Physician Parties urged that MUA was a “surgical” procedure excluded from the scope of chiropractic.”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners, Glenn Parker, Exec. Dir., & Texas Chiropractic Ass'n v. Texas Med. Ass'n, Texas Med. Bd., & the State of Texas (Tex. App. 2012). “" See Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.154 . Second, the Physician Parties urged that MUA was a "surgical" procedure excluded from the scope of chiropractic.”
Texas State Bd. of Veterinary Med. Examiners, & Nicole Oria, in Her Off. Capacity as Exec. Dir.// Ellen Jefferson, D.V.M. v. Ellen Jefferson, D.V.M.// Texas State Bd. of Veterinary Med. Examiners, & Nicole Oria, in Her Off. Capacity as Exec. Dir. (Tex. App. 2015). “In this regard, they relied on the definition or description of “surgical procedure” added by the Legislature in 2005: “ ‘[s]urgical procedure’ includes a procedure described in the surgery section of the common procedure coding system as adopted by the Centers for Medicare and…”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners & Glenn Parker, Exec. Dir. v. Texas Med. Ass'n & Texas Med. Bd. (Tex. App. 2008). “The TMA also alleged that the rule conflicted with section 201.154 of the Act, which provides, "Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the board may not adopt a process to certify chiropractors to perform manipulation under anesthesia.”
Charles Monroe Waller v. State (Tex. App. 2008). “” Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.154 (West 2004).”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners & Glenn Parker, Exec. Dir. v. Texas Med. Ass'n & Texas Med. Bd. (Tex. App. 2008). “The TMA also alleged that the rule conflicted with section 201.154 of the Act, which provides, "Notwithstanding any other provision of this chapter, the board may not adopt a process to certify chiropractors to perform manipulation under anesthesia.”
Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners & Glenn Parker, Exec. Dir. v. Texas Med. Ass'n & Texas Med. Bd. (Tex. App. 2008). “” Tex. Occ. Code Ann. § 201.154 (West 2004).”
Texas Ass'n of Acupuncture & Oriental Med. v. Texas Bd. of Chiropractic Examiners & Patricia Gilbert, Exec. Dir. in Her Off. Capacity (Tex. App. 2015). “” See Tex. Occ.Code Ann. § 201.154. Second, the use of a needle.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.