10 U.S.C. § 806b

Art. 6b. Rights of the victim of an offense under this chapter

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 10 CasesGoogle Scholar

(a)Rights of a Victim of an Offense Under This Chapter.—A victim of an offense under this chapter has the following rights:(1) The right to be reasonably protected from the accused.(2) The right to reasonable, accurate, and timely notice of any of the following:(A) A public hearing concerning the continuation of confinement prior to trial of the accused.(B) A preliminary hearing under section 832 of this title (article 32) relating to the offense.(C) A court-martial relating to the offense.(D) A post-trial motion, filing, or hearing that may address the finding or sentence of a court-martial with respect to the accused, unseal privileged or private information of the victim, or result in the release of the accused.(E) A public proceeding of the service clemency and parole board relating to the offense.(F) The release or escape of the accused, unless such notice may endanger the safety of any person.(3) The right not to be excluded from any public hearing or proceeding described in paragraph (2) unless the military judge or preliminary hearing officer, as applicable, after receiving clear and convincing evidence, determines that testimony by the victim of an offense under this chapter would be materially altered if the victim heard other testimony at that hearing or proceeding.(4) The right to be reasonably heard at any of the following:(A) A public hearing concerning the continuation of confinement prior to trial of the accused.(B) A sentencing hearing relating to the offense.(C) A public proceeding of the service clemency and parole board relating to the offense.(5) The reasonable right to confer with the counsel representing the Government at any proceeding described in paragraph (2).(6) The right to receive restitution as provided in law.(7) The right to proceedings free from unreasonable delay.(8) The right to be informed in a timely manner of any plea agreement, separation-in-lieu-of-trial agreement, or non-prosecution agreement relating to the offense, unless providing such information would jeopardize a law enforcement proceeding or would violate the privacy concerns of an individual other than the accused.(9) The right to be treated with fairness and with respect for the dignity and privacy of the victim of an offense under this chapter.(b)Victim of an Offense Under This Chapter Defined.—In this section, the term “victim of an offense under this chapter” means an individual who has suffered direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of the commission of an offense under this chapter.(c)Appointment of Individuals to Assume Rights for Certain Victims.—In the case of a victim of an offense under this chapter who is under 18 years of age (but who is not a member of the armed forces), incompetent, incapacitated, or deceased, the legal guardians of the victim or the representatives of the victim’s estate, family members, or any other person designated as suitable by the military judge, may assume the rights of the victim under this section. However, in no event may the individual so designated be the accused.(d)Rule of Construction.—Nothing in this section (article) shall be construed—(1) to authorize a cause of action for damages;(2) to create, to enlarge, or to imply any duty or obligation to any victim of an offense under this chapter or other person for the breach of which the United States or any of its officers or employees could be held liable in damages; or(3) to impair the exercise of discretion under sections 830 and 834 of this title (articles 30 and 34).(e)Enforcement by Court of Criminal Appeals.—(1) If the victim of an offense under this chapter believes that a preliminary hearing ruling under section 832 of this title (article 32) or a court-martial ruling violates the rights of the victim afforded by a section (article) or rule specified in paragraph (4), the victim may petition the Court of Criminal Appeals for a writ of mandamus to require the preliminary hearing officer or the court-martial to comply with the section (article) or rule.(2) If the victim of an offense under this chapter is subject to an order to submit to a deposition, notwithstanding the availability of the victim to testify at the court-martial trying the accused for the offense, the victim may petition the Court of Criminal Appeals for a writ of mandamus to quash such order.(3)(A) A petition for a writ of mandamus described in this subsection shall be forwarded directly to the Court of Criminal Appeals, by such means as may be prescribed by the President, subject to section 830a of this title (article 30a).(B) To the extent practicable, a petition for a writ of mandamus described in this subsection shall have priority over all other proceedings before the Court of Criminal Appeals.(C) Review of any decision of the Court of Criminal Appeals on a petition for a writ of mandamus described in this subsection shall have priority in the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, as determined under the rules of the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces.(4) Paragraph (1) applies with respect to the protections afforded by the following:(A) This section (article).(B) Section 832 (article 32) of this title.(C) Military Rule of Evidence 412, relating to the admission of evidence regarding a victim’s sexual background.(D) Military Rule of Evidence 513, relating to the psychotherapist-patient privilege.(E) Military Rule of Evidence 514, relating to the victim advocate-victim privilege.(F) Military Rule of Evidence 615, relating to the exclusion of witnesses.(f)Counsel for Accused Interview of Victim of Alleged Offense.—(1) Upon notice by counsel for the Government to counsel for the accused of the name of an alleged victim of an offense under this chapter who counsel for the Government intends to call as a witness at a proceeding under this chapter, counsel for the accused shall make any request to interview the victim through the Special Victims’ Counsel or other counsel for the victim, if applicable.(2) If requested by an alleged victim who is subject to a request for interview under paragraph (1), any interview of the victim by counsel for the accused shall take place only in the presence of the counsel for the Government, a counsel for the victim, or, if applicable, a victim advocate.(Added Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title XVII, § 1701(a)(1), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 952; amended Pub. L. 113–291, div. A, title V, §§ 531(f), 535, Dec. 19, 2014, 128 Stat. 3364, 3368; Pub. L. 114–92, div. A, title V, § 531, Nov. 25, 2015, 129 Stat. 814; Pub. L. 114–328, div. E, title LI, § 5105, title LVI, § 5203(e)(1), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2895, 2906; Pub. L. 115–91, div. A, title V, § 531(a), title X, § 1081(a)(22), (c)(1)(B), Dec. 12, 2017, 131 Stat. 1384, 1595, 1597; Pub. L. 116–283, div. A, title V, § 541, Jan. 1, 2021, 134 Stat. 3611; Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title V, § 541, Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1708.)Editorial NotesAmendments

2021—Subsec. (a)(2)(D) to (F). Pub. L. 116–283 added subpar. (D) and redesignated former subpars. (D) and (E) as (E) and (F), respectively.

Subsec. (a)(8), (9). Pub. L. 117–81 added par. (8) and redesignated former par. (8) as (9).

2017—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 115–91, § 1081(c)(1)(B), which directed striking out “(the Uniform Code of Military Justice)” after “this chapter”, was not executed in light of the prior amendment by section 1081(a)(22) of Pub. L. 115–91, to reflect the probable intent of Congress. See Amendment note below and Effective Date of 2017 Amendment note below.

Pub. L. 115–91, § 1081(a)(22), struck out “(the Uniform Code of Military Justice)” after “this chapter”.

Subsec. (e)(3). Pub. L. 115–91, § 531(a), designated existing provisions as subpar. (A), substituted “prescribed by the President, subject to section 830a of this title (article 30a)” for “prescribed by the President, and, to the extent practicable, shall have priority over all other proceedings before the court”, and added subpars. (B) and (C).

2016—Subsec. (a)(3). Pub. L. 114–328, § 5203(e)(1), substituted “preliminary hearing officer” for “investigating officer”.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 114–328, § 5105(a), substituted “the legal guardians of the victim or the representatives of the victim’s estate, family members, or any other person designated as suitable by the military judge, may assume the rights of the victim under this section.” for “the military judge shall designate a representative of the estate of the victim, a family member, or another suitable individual to assume the victim’s rights under this section.”

Subsec. (d)(3). Pub. L. 114–328, § 5105(b), added par. (3).

Subsec. (f). Pub. L. 114–328, § 5105(c), added subsec. (f).

2015—Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 114–92 amended subsec. (e) generally. Prior to amendment, text read as follows:

“(1) If the victim of an offense under this chapter believes that a court-martial ruling violates the victim’s rights afforded by a Military Rule of Evidence specified in paragraph (2), the victim may petition the Court of Criminal Appeals for a writ of mandamus to require the court-martial to comply with the Military Rule of Evidence.

“(2) Paragraph (1) applies with respect to the protections afforded by the following:

“(A) Military Rule of Evidence 513, relating to the psychotherapist-patient privilege.

“(B) Military Rule of Evidence 412, relating to the admission of evidence regarding a victim’s sexual background.”

2014—Subsec. (b). Pub. L. 113–291, § 531(f)(1), substituted “an individual” for “a person”.

Subsec. (c). Pub. L. 113–291, § 531(f)(2), in heading, substituted “Appointment of Individuals to Assume Rights” for “Legal Guardian” and, in text, inserted “(but who is not a member of the armed forces)” after “under 18 years of age” and substituted “designate a representative” for “designate a legal guardian from among the representatives”, “another suitable individual” for “other suitable person”, and “the individual” for “the person”.

Subsec. (e). Pub. L. 113–291, § 535, added subsec. (e).

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date of 2017 Amendment

Amendment by section 531(a) of Pub. L. 115–91 effective immediately after the amendments made by div. E (§§ 5001–5542) of Pub. L. 114–328 take effect as provided for in section 5542 of that Act (10 U.S.C. 801 note), see section 531(p) of Pub. L. 115–91, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.

Amendment by section 1081(c)(1)(B) of Pub. L. 115–91 effective immediately after the amendments made by div. E (§§ 5001–5542) of Pub. L. 114–328 take effect as provided for in section 5542 of that Act (10 U.S.C. 801 note), see section 1081(c)(4) of Pub. L. 115–91, set out as a note under section 801 of this title.

Effective Date of 2016 Amendment

Amendment by Pub. L. 114–328 effective on Jan. 1, 2019, as designated by the President, with implementing regulations and provisions relating to applicability to various situations, see section 5542 of Pub. L. 114–328 and Ex. Ord. No. 13825, set out as notes under section 801 of this title.

Notice to Victims of Alleged Sex-Related and Domestic Violence-Related Offenses of Pendency of Further Administrative Action Following a Determination Not To Refer to Trial by Court-Martial

Pub. L. 116–92, div. A, title V, § 549, Dec. 20, 2019, 133 Stat. 1379, as amended by Pub. L. 117–81, div. A, title V, § 545, Dec. 27, 2021, 135 Stat. 1711; Pub. L. 118–159, div. A, title V, § 569C, Dec. 23, 2024, 138 Stat. 1907, provided that: “Notwithstanding section 552a of title 5, United States Code, and under regulations prescribed by the Secretary of Defense, upon a determination not to refer a case of an alleged sex-related offense (as defined in section 1044e(h) of title 10, United States Code), or a case of an alleged domestic violence-related offense (as defined by the Secretary), for trial by court-martial under chapter 47 of title 10, United States Code (the Uniform Code of Military Justice), the commander making such determination shall ensure that the victim (or the victim’s legal counsel if so requested by the victim) is periodically notified of the status of a final determination on further action on such case, whether non-judicial punishment under section 815 of such title (article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), other administrative action, or no further action. Such notifications shall continue not less frequently than monthly until such final determination. Upon such final determination, the commander shall ensure that the victim (or the victim’s legal counsel if so requested by the victim) is notified of the type of action taken on such case, the outcome of the action (including any punishments assigned or characterization of service, as applicable), and such other information as the commander determines to be relevant.”

Implementation

Pub. L. 113–66, div. A, title XVII, § 1701(b), Dec. 26, 2013, 127 Stat. 953, provided that:“(1)Issuance.—Not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act [Dec. 26, 2013]—“(A) the Secretary of Defense shall recommend to the President changes to the Manual for Courts-Martial to implement section 806b of title 10, United States Code (article 6b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by subsection (a); and“(B) the Secretary of Defense and Secretary of Homeland Security (with respect to the Coast Guard when it is not operating as a service in the Navy) shall prescribe such regulations as each such Secretary considers appropriate to implement such section.“(2)Mechanisms for affording rights.—The recommendations and regulations required by paragraph (1) shall include the following:“(A) Mechanisms for ensuring that victims are notified of, and accorded, the rights specified in section 806b of title 10, United States Code (article 6b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice), as added by subsection (a).“(B) Mechanisms for ensuring that members of the Armed Forces and civilian personnel of the Department of Defense and the Coast Guard make their best efforts to ensure that victims are notified of, and accorded, the rights specified in such section.“(C) Mechanisms for the enforcement of such rights, including mechanisms for application for such rights and for consideration and disposition of applications for such rights.“(D) The designation of an authority within each Armed Force to receive and investigate complaints relating to the provision or violation of such rights.“(E) Disciplinary sanctions for members of the Armed Forces and other personnel of the Department of Defense and Coast Guard who willfully or wantonly fail to comply with requirements relating to such rights.”

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 108 cases (66 in the last 5 years), 2014–2026 · leading case: Randolph v. HV & United States, 76 M.J. 27 (C.A.A.F. 2017).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Randolph v. HV & United States, 76 M.J. 27 (C.A.A.F. 2017). · cites it 8× “10 U.S.C. § 806b (2015). Because this is an Article 6b, UCMJ, case, and Congress limited review of Article 6b, UCMJ, petitions to the CCAs, we have no jurisdiction.”

EV v. United States, 75 M.J. 331 (C.A.A.F. 2016). “As such, we do not reach the merits of EVs contentions and dismiss her petition for lack of jurisdiction.”

E. v. v. Robinson, 200 F. Supp. 3d 108 (D.D.C. 2016). · cites it 2× “She alleges that Judge Robinson’s discovery rulings violate Military Rule of Evidence 513, Article 6b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 806b(a)(8), and the Constitution.”

Holcombe v. United States, 388 F. Supp. 3d 777 (W.D. Tex. 2019). “"); 10 U.S.C. § 806b ("Nothing in this section (article) shall be construed .”

United States v. Hamilton, No. ACM 39085 (A.F.C.C.A. Dec. 20, 2017). · cites it 5× “Article 6b nearly mirrors the rights afforded to victims in civilian criminal trials under the CVRA and establishes that a victim has “[t]he right to be reasonably heard .”

In re RW v. United States, No. 2023-08 (A.F.C.C.A. Feb. 9, 2024). · cites it 5× “________________________ WARREN, Judge: On 25 September 2023, pursuant to Article 6b, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 806b,2 and Rule 19 of the Joint Rules of Appellate Procedure for Courts of Criminal Appeals, JT.”

In re KC v. United States, Misc. Dkt. No. 2021-06 (A.F.C.C.A. Nov. 9, 2021). · cites it 5× “Article 6b, UMCJ, 10 U.S.C. § 806b, establishes a victim’s ability to petition this court when the victim “believes that .”

In re RR v. United States, Misc. Dkt. No. 2024-08 (A.F.C.C.A. July 22, 2024). · cites it 5× “On 14 March 2024, Petitioner filed an initial petition with this court for extraordinary relief, pursuant to Article 6b, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 806b. Specifi- cally, Petitioner requested we issue a writ of mandamus requiring the trial judge to vacate his abatement ruling of 23…”

In re HF v. United States, Misc. Dkt. No. 2025-04 (A.F.C.C.A. June 13, 2025). · cites it 5× “[they] may assert [certain] rights enumerated in Article 6b, UCMJ, [10 U.S.C. § 806b,] in the Manual for Courts-Martial, and under other applicable laws.”

In re LB, Misc. Dkt. No. 2025-14 (A.F.C.C.A. Mar. 19, 2026). · cites it 5× “Article 6b, UCMJ Article 6b(b), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 806b, defines “victim of an offense under this chapter” as “an individual who has suffered direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of the commission of an offense under [the UCMJ].”

Randolph v. HV & United States, No. 16-0678/CG (C.A.A.F. Feb. 2, 2017). · cites it 4× “10 U.S.C. § 806b (2015). Because this is an Article 6b, UCMJ, case, and Congress limited review of Article 6b, UCMJ, petitions to the CCAs, we have no jurisdiction.”

Show all 108 citing cases →

10 U.S.C. § 806b(a)(1): 1 case

In re KC v. United States, Misc. Dkt. No. 2021-06 (A.F.C.C.A. Nov. 9, 2021). “Article 6b, UMCJ, 10 U.S.C. § 806b, establishes a victim’s ability to petition this court when the victim “believes that .”

10 U.S.C. § 806b(a)(2)(C): 1 case

In re United States v. (US. v. Robinson), Misc. Dkt. No. 2022-09 (A.F.C.C.A. Feb. 3, 2023).

10 U.S.C. § 806b(a)(3): 1 case

United States v. Densford, No. 201700158 (N.M.C.C.A. July 31, 2017).

10 U.S.C. § 806b(a)(4): 4 cases

United States v. Dipippo, No. ACM S32299 (A.F.C.C.A. Feb. 26, 2016).

United States v. Hamilton, No. ACM 39085 (A.F.C.C.A. Dec. 20, 2017). “Article 6b nearly mirrors the rights afforded to victims in civilian criminal trials under the CVRA and establishes that a victim has “[t]he right to be reasonably heard .”

United States v. Johnson, No. ACM 39676 (A.F.C.C.A. Oct. 16, 2020).

United States v. Robles, No. 40280 (A.F.C.C.A. Aug. 18, 2023).

10 U.S.C. § 806b(a)(4)(B): 34 cases

United States v. Menard, No. 40496 (A.F.C.C.A. Mar. 28, 2025).

United States v. Rowe, No. ACM 38880, 2017 CCA LEXIS 89 (A.F.C.C.A. Feb. 8, 2017).

United States v. Roblero, No. ACM 38874 (A.F.C.C.A. Feb. 17, 2017).

United States v. Turpiano, No. ACM 38873 (A.F.C.C.A. May 24, 2018).

10 U.S.C. § 806b(a)(4)(C): 1 case

United States v. Badders, 82 M.J. 299 (C.A.A.F. 2022).

10 U.S.C. § 806b(a)(5): 1 case

In re United States v. (US. v. Robinson), Misc. Dkt. No. 2022-09 (A.F.C.C.A. Feb. 3, 2023).

10 U.S.C. § 806b(a)(7): 2 cases

United States v. Snyder, No. ACM 39470 (A.F.C.C.A. Apr. 15, 2020).

In re HK v. United States, Misc Dkt. No. 2021-07 (A.F.C.C.A. Oct. 22, 2021).

10 U.S.C. § 806b(a)(8): 3 cases

E. v. v. Robinson, 200 F. Supp. 3d 108 (D.D.C. 2016). “She alleges that Judge Robinson’s discovery rulings violate Military Rule of Evidence 513, Article 6b of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 806b(a)(8), and the Constitution.”

Captain Thomas R. Neumann v. Colonel Michael J. Hargis, No. ARMY MISC 20170417 (A.C.C.A. Aug. 16, 2017).

10 U.S.C. § 806b(a)(9): 5 cases

In re RW v. United States, No. 2023-08 (A.F.C.C.A. Feb. 9, 2024). “________________________ WARREN, Judge: On 25 September 2023, pursuant to Article 6b, Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. § 806b,2 and Rule 19 of the Joint Rules of Appellate Procedure for Courts of Criminal Appeals, JT.”

Av2 v. Mcdonough, No. 2:22-cv-00369 (E.D. Pa. Apr. 20, 2022).

In re RR v. United States, Misc. Dkt. No. 2024-08 (A.F.C.C.A. July 22, 2024). “On 14 March 2024, Petitioner filed an initial petition with this court for extraordinary relief, pursuant to Article 6b, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 806b. Specifi- cally, Petitioner requested we issue a writ of mandamus requiring the trial judge to vacate his abatement ruling of 23…”

In re DD v. United States, Misc. Dkt. No. 2024-11 (A.F.C.C.A. Oct. 31, 2024).

In re HF v. United States, Misc. Dkt. No. 2025-04 (A.F.C.C.A. June 13, 2025). “[they] may assert [certain] rights enumerated in Article 6b, UCMJ, [10 U.S.C. § 806b,] in the Manual for Courts-Martial, and under other applicable laws.”

10 U.S.C. § 806b(b): 14 cases

United States v. Vanhise, No. ACM 38882 (A.F.C.C.A. Feb. 13, 2017).

United States v. Brooks, No. ACM S32394 (A.F.C.C.A. Mar. 22, 2017).

United States v. Ray, No. ACM 39480 (A.F.C.C.A. Nov. 20, 2019).

United States v. Dunlap, No. ACM 39567, 2020 CCA LEXIS 148 (A.F.C.C.A. May 4, 2020).

United States v. McInnis, No. ACM 39576 (A.F.C.C.A. May 29, 2020).

10 U.S.C. § 806b(c): 4 cases

United States v. Vanhise, No. ACM 38882 (A.F.C.C.A. Feb. 13, 2017).

United States v. Harrington, No. 39825, 2021 CCA LEXIS 524 (A.F.C.C.A. Oct. 14, 2021).

United States v. Edwards, No. 39696, 2021 CCA LEXIS 106 (A.F.C.C.A. Mar. 10, 2021).

10 U.S.C. § 806b(c)(4): 1 case

United States v. Felix, No. 201800071 (N.M.C.C.A. June 19, 2019).

10 U.S.C. § 806b(d)(1): 1 case

Bryant v. McLean, No. 1:23-cv-00997 (D. Colo. Feb. 27, 2024).

10 U.S.C. § 806b(e): 4 cases

United States v. Sergeant OTIS R. DUCKSWORTH, No. ARMY MISC 20150769 (A.C.C.A. Feb. 1, 2016).

H.V.Z. v. U.S. & Fewell, No. 23-0250/AF (C.A.A.F. July 18, 2024).

United States v. DEREMER, No. 202300205 (N.M.C.C.A. Feb. 7, 2025).

10 U.S.C. § 806b(e)(1): 27 cases

Randolph v. HV & United States, 76 M.J. 27 (C.A.A.F. 2017). “10 U.S.C. § 806b (2015). Because this is an Article 6b, UCMJ, case, and Congress limited review of Article 6b, UCMJ, petitions to the CCAs, we have no jurisdiction.”

Captain Thomas R. Neumann v. Colonel Michael J. Hargis, No. ARMY MISC 20170417 (A.C.C.A. Oct. 31, 2017).

In re KS v. United States, Misc Dkt No. 2023-06 (A.F.C.C.A. Sept. 26, 2023).

In re JF v. United States, Misc. Dkt. No. 2024-07 (A.F.C.C.A. June 25, 2024).

In re LB, Misc. Dkt. No. 2025-14 (A.F.C.C.A. Mar. 19, 2026). “Article 6b, UCMJ Article 6b(b), UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 806b, defines “victim of an offense under this chapter” as “an individual who has suffered direct physical, emotional, or pecuniary harm as a result of the commission of an offense under [the UCMJ].”

10 U.S.C. § 806b(e)(4): 3 cases

10 U.S.C. § 806b(e)(l): 2 cases

EV v. United States, 75 M.J. 331 (C.A.A.F. 2016). “As such, we do not reach the merits of EVs contentions and dismiss her petition for lack of jurisdiction.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.

Your account

Appearance

Create a free account

You’re in.

10 U.S.C. § 806b

Art. 6b. Rights of the victim of an offense under this chapter