18 U.S.C. § 1012
Department of Housing and Urban Development transactions
Whoever, with intent to defraud, makes any false entry in any book of the Department of Housing and Urban Development or makes any false report or statement to or for such Department; or
Whoever receives any compensation, rebate, or reward, with intent to defraud such Department or with intent unlawfully to defeat its purposes; or
Whoever induces or influences such Department to purchase or acquire any property or to enter into any contract and willfully fails to disclose any interest which he has in such property or in the property to which such contract relates, or any special benefit which he expects to receive as a result of such contract—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 44
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1954–2024 · leading case: United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997).
United States v. Wells, 519 U.S. 482 (1997). “§ 1011 (penalizing knowing false statement in sale of mortgage to federal land bank); 18 U. S. C. § 1012 (penalizing intentional false entry in book of Department of Housing and Urban Development); 18 U.”
United States v. James R. Gallup, United States of Am. v. Darryl E. Duke, 812 F.2d 1271 (10th Cir. 1987). “§ 371 , Conspiracy to Defraud the United States government, and 18 U.S.C. § 1012 , Influencing Department of Housing and Urban Development transactions.”
United States v. Hildenbrand, 527 F.3d 466 (5th Cir. 2008). “§§ 666 and 371 (count 1); defrauding HUD, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1012 (counts 2 through 24); theft from an organization, in violation of 18 U.”
United States v. Mullins, 613 F.3d 1273 (10th Cir. 2010). “Mullins argues that the jury should have been instructed that it could, in lieu of finding her guilty of wire fraud, convict her of the lesser included offense of making a false statement to HUD, a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1012 . The district court rejected this argument, and so…”
United States v. Reagan, 596 F.3d 251 (5th Cir. 2010). “He contends that the indictment improperly charged him under § 641 rather than under the HUD fraud statute, 18 U.S.C. § 1012 , and failed to set out the charges against him in a “plain and intelligible manner.”
In Re Sims, 861 A.2d 1 (D.C. 2004). “Abrahamson entered a plea of "guilty to one misdemeanor count of unlawful receipt of compensation with intent to defeat the purposes of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1012 ." Id. at 950 . We accepted the Board's…”
United States v. Michael E. Gaudin, 28 F.3d 943 (9th Cir. 1994). “§ 1011 (penalizing knowing false statement in sale of mortgage to federal land bank); 18 U.S.C. § 1012 (penalizing intentional false entiy in book of Department of Housing and Urban Development); 18 U.”
United States v. Milton Dean Batchelder, 581 F.2d 626 (7th Cir. 1978). “§ 1001 and 18 U.S.C. § 1012 ); United States v. Devitt, 499 F.”
United States v. Sloan, 505 F.3d 685 (7th Cir. 2007). “Sloan’s failure to witness the signing was a misdemeanor in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1012 . In the signed plea agreement, Sloan voluntarily acknowledged his criminal conduct that formed the basis for the charge and stipulated to his participation in the fraudulent scheme,…”
United States v. Hilda Cervantes, 420 F.3d 792 (8th Cir. 2005). “See 18 U.S.C. § 1012 (2000). The District Court 1 *794 ordered Cervantes to pay more than $20,000 in restitution to HUD, sentenced her to five years of probation, and imposed a condition of probation requiring her submission to mandatory drug testing.”
United States v. Burton A. Librach, 520 F.2d 550 (8th Cir. 1975). “e case because of prosecutorial delay in bringing the indictment, *552 (3) admission of allegedly illegal testimony, (4) a procedural ruling allowing the Government to lead its own witness and attempt to refresh the recollection of that witness, and (5) imposition of sentence…”
United States v. Commty Hsing Fund, 304 F. App'x 334 (5th Cir. 2008). “Hildenbrand has been convicted of violating 18 U.S.C. § 1012 in connection with the wrongful receipt or use of funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.