U.S. Code » Title 20 » Chapter CHAPTER 47— STRENGTHENING AND IMPROVEMENT OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER I— BASIC PROGRAMS › Division Division 1— Financial Assistance To Meet Special Educational Needs of Children

20 U.S.C. § 2701

Omitted

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 20 CasesGoogle Scholar

[omitted]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 54 cases, 1979–2018 · leading case: Bell v. New Jersey, 461 U.S. 773 (1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bell v. New Jersey, 461 U.S. 773 (1983). · cites it 4× “27, as amended, 20 U. S. C. § 2701 et seq. (1976 ed., Supp.”
Bennett v. New Jersey, 470 U.S. 632 (1985). · cites it 4× “2143, 20 U. S. C. § 2701 et seq., should determine whether the funds were misused during the years 1970-1972.”
Maine v. Thiboutot, 448 U.S. 1 (1980). · cites it 2× “2153 , as amended, 20 U. S. C. § 2701 et seq. (1976 ed., Supp.”
Garcia v. San Antonio Metro. Transit Auth., 469 U.S. 528 (1985). · cites it 2× “27 , as amended, 20 U. S. C. § 2701 et seq.; the Water Pollution Control Act, 62 Stat.”
Nat'l Coalition for Pub. Educ. & Religious Liberty v. Harris, 489 F. Supp. 1248 (S.D.N.Y. 1980). · cites it 3× “27 , as amended, 20 U.S.C. §§ 2701 et seq. (“Title I”), was launched over twenty years ago and, at that time, culminated in the landmark decision of Flast v.”
State of California, Dep't of Educ. v. William J. Bennett, Sec'y of Educ., United States Dep't of Educ., 833 F.2d 827 (9th Cir. 1987). · cites it 2× “27 (codified as amended at 20 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq.), 1 the federal government provided funds to local educational agencies (“LEAs”) 2 to meet the *829 needs of educationally deprived children residing in school attendance areas with high concentrations of children from low…”
Meyers Ex Rel. Meyers v. Bd. of Educ., 905 F. Supp. 1544 (D. Utah 1995). · cites it 3× “Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, now referred to as chapter I (codified as amended and reorganized at 20 U.S.C.A. §§ 2701-2976 ), provides financial assistance to local educational agencies for the education of Indian children.”
Murphy v. Middletown Enlarged City Sch. Dist., 525 F. Supp. 678 (S.D.N.Y. 1981). · cites it 3× “In the present action, the parties have stipulated as to the federal programs from which the district receives financial assistance: 218 Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, 20 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq; Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education…”
Bennett v. Kentucky Dep't of Educ., 470 U.S. 656 (1985). “27, as amended, 20 U. S. C. §2701 et seq., provided federal grants to support compensatory education programs for disadvantaged children.”
Dep't of Educ., State of Hawaii v. Terrel Bell, Sec'y of Educ., United States Dep't of Educ., 770 F.2d 1409 (9th Cir. 1985). · cites it 3× “27, as amended, 20 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq. (1976 Supp. V) (“Title I”).”
In Re Alien Child. Educ. Litig., 501 F. Supp. 544 (S.D. Tex. 1980). · cites it 2× “Title I, 20 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq. is the major program of federal aid for elementary and secondary schools.”
United States v. Yonkers Bd. of Educ., 624 F. Supp. 1276 (S.D.N.Y. 1985). “See 20 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq. Like Project Orbit, Title I funding resulted in additional reading and math programs and individualized instruction at schools with low-achieving, low-income students.”
Show all 54 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.