Notes of Decisions
Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 639 (Fed. Cl. 2006).
· cites it 13× “Order of January 14, 1993; see also Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment on the Money Mandating-ness of the General Tribal Trust Fund Investment Statutes, 25 U.S.C. §§ 161a and 162a ( Pis.’ Inv. MSJ Mem.”
United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation, 564 U.S. 162 (2011).
· cites it 4× “The Tribe argues that the Government violated various laws, including 25 U. S. C. §§161a and 162a, that govern the management of funds held in trust for Indian tribes.”
Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed. Cl. 629 (Fed. Cl. 2010).
· cites it 6× “The court in Shoshone specifically recognized 25 U.S.C. § 161a, along with §§ 155, 161b, and 162a, as being part of the necessary statutory “hook” that was lacking in Mitchell.”
Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United States, 112 Fed. Cl. 274 (Fed. Cl. 2013).
· cites it 7× “The court proceeded to review the statutory investment scheme, tracing the history and language of statutes like 25 U.S.C. §§ 161a, 161b, and 162a back into the 1880s.”
Osage Tribe of Indians v. United States, 72 Fed. Cl. 629 (Fed. Cl. 2006).
· cites it 5× “Defendant, in carrying out its investment duties, had the further responsibility to comply with the legal requirements applicable to those duties, including the federal statute governing the investment of Indian trust funds, 25 U.S.C. §§ 161a, 161b, 162a, applicable regulations,…”
Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United States, 100 Fed. Cl. 726 (Fed. Cl. 2011).
· cites it 6× “The court proceeded to review the statutory investment scheme, tracing the history and language of statutes like 25 U.S.C. §§ 161a, 161b, and 162a back into the 1880s.”
Short v. United States, 12 Cl. Ct. 36 (Ct. Cl. 1987).
· cites it 6× “The defendant concedes that the unallotted Reservation income was held in an “Indian Monies, Proceeds of Labor” (IMPL) account, but argues that plaintiffs, as individuals, may not claim interest on such accounts because such monies are held for “tribes,” under 25 U.S.C. §§ 161a,…”
Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale, 392 F.3d 461 (D.C. Cir. 2004).
· cites it 2× “See 25 U.S.C. §§ 161a(b), 162a(a). As the label Cobell V suggests, this litigation has generated many legal opinions, including three of this court.”
Osage Tribe of Indians v. United States, 68 Fed. Cl. 322 (Fed. Cl. 2005).
· cites it 3× “Plaintiff identifies, by way of example, an alleged duty to invest found in 25 U.S.C. § 161a. Id. Plaintiff describes the alleged failure to invest in the following terms: (a) failure “to deposit funds in an interest bearing account within a reasonable time after [the defendant]…”
Short v. United States, 50 F.3d 994 (Fed. Cir. 1995).
· cites it 7× “See 25 U.S.C. §§ 161a, 161b, 162a (1988); Short IV, 12 Cl.”
Osage Tribe v. United States, 75 Fed. Cl. 462 (Fed. Cl. 2007).
· cites it 5× “Appeals for the Federal Circuit held that “when the Government has a clear statutory fiduciary duty to collect or manage funds and further undertakes the duty to earn interest on those funds, the failure of the Government to collect or manage such funds in accordance with its…”
25 U.S.C. § 161a(a): 2 cases
United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation, 564 U.S. 162 (2011).
“The Tribe argues that the Government violated various laws, including 25 U. S. C. §§161a and 162a, that govern the management of funds held in trust for Indian tribes.”
Chippewa Cree Tribe of the Rocky Boy's Reservation v. United States, 69 Fed. Cl. 639 (Fed. Cl. 2006).
“Order of January 14, 1993; see also Plaintiffs’ Memorandum in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment on the Money Mandating-ness of the General Tribal Trust Fund Investment Statutes, 25 U.S.C. §§ 161a and 162a ( Pis.’ Inv. MSJ Mem.”
25 U.S.C. § 161a(b): 5 cases
Oenga v. United States, 91 Fed. Cl. 629 (Fed. Cl. 2010).
“The court in Shoshone specifically recognized 25 U.S.C. § 161a, along with §§ 155, 161b, and 162a, as being part of the necessary statutory “hook” that was lacking in Mitchell.”
Cobell, Elouise v. Norton, Gale, 392 F.3d 461 (D.C. Cir. 2004).
“See 25 U.S.C. §§ 161a(b), 162a(a). As the label Cobell V suggests, this litigation has generated many legal opinions, including three of this court.”
Jicarilla Apache Nation v. United States, 100 Fed. Cl. 726 (Fed. Cl. 2011).
“The court proceeded to review the statutory investment scheme, tracing the history and language of statutes like 25 U.S.C. §§ 161a, 161b, and 162a back into the 1880s.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.