39 U.S.C. § 3642

New products and transfers of products between the market-dominant and competitive categories of mail

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 39 CasesGoogle Scholar
(a)In General.—Upon request of the Postal Service or users of the mails, or upon its own initiative, the Postal Regulatory Commission may change the list of market-dominant products under section 3621 and the list of competitive products under section 3631 by adding new products to the lists, removing products from the lists, or transferring products between the lists.(b)Criteria.—All determinations by the Postal Regulatory Commission under subsection (a) shall be made in accordance with the following criteria:(1) The market-dominant category of products shall consist of each product in the sale of which the Postal Service exercises sufficient market power that it can effectively set the price of such product substantially above costs, raise prices significantly, decrease quality, or decrease output, without risk of losing a significant level of business to other firms offering similar products. The competitive category of products shall consist of all other products.(2)Exclusion of products covered by postal monopoly.—A product covered by the postal monopoly shall not be subject to transfer under this section from the market-dominant category of mail. For purposes of the preceding sentence, the term “product covered by the postal monopoly” means any product the conveyance or transmission of which is reserved to the United States under section 1696 of title 18, subject to the same exception as set forth in the last sentence of section 409(e)(1).(3)Additional considerations.—In making any decision under this section, due regard shall be given to—(A) the availability and nature of enterprises in the private sector engaged in the delivery of the product involved;(B) the views of those who use the product involved on the appropriateness of the proposed action; and(C) the likely impact of the proposed action on small business concerns (within the meaning of section 3641(h)).(c)Transfers of Subclasses and Other Subordinate Units Allowable.—Nothing in this title shall be considered to prevent transfers under this section from being made by reason of the fact that they would involve only some (but not all) of the subclasses or other subordinate units of the class of mail or type of postal service involved (without regard to satisfaction of minimum quantity requirements standing alone).(d)Notification and Publication Requirements.—(1)Notification requirement.—The Postal Service shall, whenever it requests to add a product or transfer a product to a different category, file with the Postal Regulatory Commission and publish in the Federal Register a notice setting out the basis for its determination that the product satisfies the criteria under subsection (b) and, in the case of a request to add a product or transfer a product to the competitive category of mail, that the product meets the regulations promulgated by the Postal Regulatory Commission under section 3633. The provisions of section 504(g) shall be available with respect to any information required to be filed.(2)Publication requirement.—The Postal Regulatory Commission shall, whenever it changes the list of products in the market-dominant or competitive category of mail, prescribe new lists of products. The revised lists shall indicate how and when any previous lists (including the lists under sections 3621 and 3631) are superseded, and shall be published in the Federal Register.(e)Prohibition.—Except as provided in section 3641, no product that involves the physical delivery of letters, printed matter, or packages may be offered by the Postal Service unless it has been assigned to the market-dominant or competitive category of mail (as appropriate) either—(1) under this subchapter; or(2) by or under any other provision of law.(Added Pub. L. 103–123, title VII, § 704(a)(2), Oct. 28, 1993, 107 Stat. 1268; amended Pub. L. 109–435, title II, § 203, Dec. 20, 2006, 120 Stat. 3209.)Editorial NotesAmendments

2006—Pub. L. 109–435 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section consisted of subsecs. (a) to (d), related to special authority relating to reduced-rate categories of mail.

Statutory Notes and Related SubsidiariesEffective Date

Section applicable with respect to rates for mail sent after Sept. 30, 1993, see section 704(c)(1) of Pub. L. 103–123, set out as an Effective Date of 1993 Amendment note under section 3626 of this title.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2013–2021 · leading case: Anatol Zukerman v. USPS, 961 F.3d 431 (D.C. Cir. 2020).
Anatol Zukerman v. USPS, 961 F.3d 431 (D.C. Cir. 2020). “The Postal Service has also submitted a request, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. § 3642 and 39 C.F.R. §§ 3040.130 -.”
Newspaper Assoc. of Am. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 734 F.3d 1208 (D.C. Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “39 U.S.C. § 3642 (b). A service is “market-dominant” if either (1) the Postal Service has achieved a level of market power in providing that service that would allow it to raise prices without losing “a significant level of business,” id.”
United States Postal Serv. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 785 F.3d 740 (D.C. Cir. 2015). “See 39 U.S.C. § 3642 (b)(1), (2). Remaining products, for which the Postal Service faces meaningful market competition, are classified as “competitive products” and are not at issue in this case.”
United Parcel Serv., Inc. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 890 F.3d 1053 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “" See 39 U.S.C. § 3642 (b)(1). Market-dominant products are those over which "the Postal Service exercises sufficient market power that it can effectively" raise prices or decrease quality "without risk of losing a significant level of business to other firms offering similar…”
Nat'l Postal Policy Council v. PRC, 17 F.4th 1184 (D.C. Cir. 2021). “2015) (citing 39 U.S.C. § 3642 (b)(1)–(2)). The Act required the Commission to “establish” within eighteen months “a modern system for regulating rates and classes for market-dominant products.”
United States Postal Serv. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 842 F.3d 1271 (D.C. Cir. 2016). “” 39 U.S.C. § 3642 (b)(1). MarkeUdominant products are subject to rate regulation by the Postal Regulatory Commission, id.”
United Parcel Serv., Inc. v. PRC, 955 F.3d 1038 (D.C. Cir. 2020). “2018) (quoting 39 U.S.C. § 3642 (b)(1)); see also 39 U.S.”
Usps v. Prc (D.C. Cir. 2018). · cites it 7× “39 U.S.C. § 3642 (a). The Postal Service’s competitive products vie with similar products on the open market, while the Postal Service exercises substantial market power or enjoys a legal monopoly over its market-dominant products.”
U.S. Postal Serv. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 886 F.3d 1261 (D.C. Cir. 2018). · cites it 7× “39 U.S.C. § 3642 (a). The Postal Service's competitive products vie with similar products on the open market, while the Postal Service exercises substantial market power or enjoys a legal monopoly over its market-dominant products.”
United States Postal Serv. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 816 F.3d 883 (D.C. Cir. 2016). · cites it 2× “Section 39 U.S.C. § 3642 (b)(1), the governing statute’s definition of a market- *488 dominant product, includes all products meeting the following description: [E]ach product in the sale of which the Postal Service exercises sufficient market power that it can effectively set…”
Usps v. Prc (D.C. Cir. 2016). · cites it 2× “Section 39 U.S.C. § 3642 (b)(1), the governing statute’s definition of a market-dominant product, includes all products meeting the following description: [E]ach product in the sale of which the Postal Service exercises sufficient market power that it can effectively set the…”
Newspaper Assoc. of Am. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n (D.C. Cir. 2013). · cites it 2× “39 U.S.C. § 3642 (b). A service is “market-dominant” if either (1) the Postal Service has achieved a level of market power in providing that service that would allow it to raise prices without losing “a significant level of business,” id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.