39 U.S.C. § 3642
New products and transfers of products between the market-dominant and competitive categories of mail
2006—Pub. L. 109–435 amended section generally. Prior to amendment, section consisted of subsecs. (a) to (d), related to special authority relating to reduced-rate categories of mail.
Section applicable with respect to rates for mail sent after
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 14
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2013–2021 · leading case: Anatol Zukerman v. USPS, 961 F.3d 431 (D.C. Cir. 2020).
Anatol Zukerman v. USPS, 961 F.3d 431 (D.C. Cir. 2020). “The Postal Service has also submitted a request, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. § 3642 and 39 C.F.R. §§ 3040.130 -.”
Newspaper Assoc. of Am. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 734 F.3d 1208 (D.C. Cir. 2013). “39 U.S.C. § 3642 (b). A service is “market-dominant” if either (1) the Postal Service has achieved a level of market power in providing that service that would allow it to raise prices without losing “a significant level of business,” id.”
United States Postal Serv. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 785 F.3d 740 (D.C. Cir. 2015). “See 39 U.S.C. § 3642 (b)(1), (2). Remaining products, for which the Postal Service faces meaningful market competition, are classified as “competitive products” and are not at issue in this case.”
United Parcel Serv., Inc. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 890 F.3d 1053 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “" See 39 U.S.C. § 3642 (b)(1). Market-dominant products are those over which "the Postal Service exercises sufficient market power that it can effectively" raise prices or decrease quality "without risk of losing a significant level of business to other firms offering similar…”
Nat'l Postal Policy Council v. PRC, 17 F.4th 1184 (D.C. Cir. 2021). “2015) (citing 39 U.S.C. § 3642 (b)(1)–(2)). The Act required the Commission to “establish” within eighteen months “a modern system for regulating rates and classes for market-dominant products.”
United States Postal Serv. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 842 F.3d 1271 (D.C. Cir. 2016). “” 39 U.S.C. § 3642 (b)(1). MarkeUdominant products are subject to rate regulation by the Postal Regulatory Commission, id.”
United Parcel Serv., Inc. v. PRC, 955 F.3d 1038 (D.C. Cir. 2020). “2018) (quoting 39 U.S.C. § 3642 (b)(1)); see also 39 U.S.”
Usps v. Prc (D.C. Cir. 2018). “39 U.S.C. § 3642 (a). The Postal Service’s competitive products vie with similar products on the open market, while the Postal Service exercises substantial market power or enjoys a legal monopoly over its market-dominant products.”
U.S. Postal Serv. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 886 F.3d 1261 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “39 U.S.C. § 3642 (a). The Postal Service's competitive products vie with similar products on the open market, while the Postal Service exercises substantial market power or enjoys a legal monopoly over its market-dominant products.”
United States Postal Serv. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 816 F.3d 883 (D.C. Cir. 2016). “Section 39 U.S.C. § 3642 (b)(1), the governing statute’s definition of a market- *488 dominant product, includes all products meeting the following description: [E]ach product in the sale of which the Postal Service exercises sufficient market power that it can effectively set…”
Usps v. Prc (D.C. Cir. 2016). “Section 39 U.S.C. § 3642 (b)(1), the governing statute’s definition of a market-dominant product, includes all products meeting the following description: [E]ach product in the sale of which the Postal Service exercises sufficient market power that it can effectively set the…”
Newspaper Assoc. of Am. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n (D.C. Cir. 2013). “39 U.S.C. § 3642 (b). A service is “market-dominant” if either (1) the Postal Service has achieved a level of market power in providing that service that would allow it to raise prices without losing “a significant level of business,” id.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.