39 U.S.C. § 3663
Appellate review
A person, including the Postal Service, adversely affected or aggrieved by a final order or decision of the Postal Regulatory Commission may, within 30 days after such order or decision becomes final, institute proceedings for review thereof by filing a petition in the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. The court shall review the order or decision in accordance with section 706 of title 5, and chapter 158 and section 2112 of title 28, on the basis of the record before the Commission.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22
cases (10 in the last 5 years), 2012–2025 · leading case: Douglas Carlson v. PRC, 938 F.3d 337 (D.C. Cir. 2019).
Douglas Carlson v. PRC, 938 F.3d 337 (D.C. Cir. 2019). “Carlson timely petitioned this Court for review of the first- class rate adjustments in Order 4875, arguing that the stamp price hike violated the APA because the Commission failed to consider relevant statutory objectives and factors and failed to provide a reasoned explanation…”
Elaine Mittleman v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 757 F.3d 300 (D.C. Cir. 2014). “That provision is § 3663, which states: “A person, including the Postal Service, adversely affected or aggrieved by a final order or decision of the Postal Regulatory Commission may ... institute proceedings for review thereof by filing a petition in the United States Court of…”
United Parcel Serv., Inc. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 890 F.3d 1053 (D.C. Cir. 2018). “See 39 U.S.C. § 3663 (establishing that Commission orders are reviewed under 5 U.”
Reese Bros., Inc. v. United States Postal Serv., 905 F. Supp. 2d 223 (D.D.C. 2012). “§ 3012 (APA review applies to civil penalties imposed for nonmailable matter); 39 U.S.C. § 3663 (APA review by Court of Appeals available to a person "adversely affected or aggrieved by a final order or decision of the Postal Regulatory Commission”); see also 39 U.”
All. of Nonprofit Mailers v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 790 F.3d 186 (D.C. Cir. 2015). “See 39 U.S.C. § 3663 (applying APA standards to review of Commission actions).”
United Parcel Serv., Inc. v. PRC, 955 F.3d 1038 (D.C. Cir. 2020). “; see also 39 U.S.C. § 3663 (incorporating APA review under 5 U.”
GameFly, Inc. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 704 F.3d 145 (D.C. Cir. 2013). “DISCUSSION We have jurisdiction for this appellate review under 39 U.S.C. § 3663 , which provides for petitions for review in this court.”
United Parcel Serv., Inc. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 96 F.4th 422 (D.C. Cir. 2024). “Accordingly, pursuant to arbitrary and capricious review, 39 U.S.C. § 3663 ; 5 U.S.C. § 706 (2)(A), the court denies the petition for review.”
United States Postal Serv. v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 747 F.3d 906 (D.C. Cir. 2014). “§ 706 (2)(A)); see also 39 U.S.C. § 3663 (incorporating APA review standard).”
Am. Postal Workers Union v. Postal Regulatory Comm'n, 842 F.3d 711 (D.C. Cir. 2016). “39 U.S.C. § 3663 (e); see Rules for Complaints, supra, at 22-23.”
Usps v. Prc (D.C. Cir. 2020). “The Postal Service petitioned for review, and the Commission stayed release of the data pending our disposition.”
Coins N' Things, Inc. v. U.S. Postal Serv., 368 F. Supp. 3d 298 (D.D.C. 2019). “39 U.S.C. § 3663 excepts final orders of the Postal Regulatory Commission ("PRC") from the general rule of district court jurisdiction.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.