42 U.S.C. § 15484
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases, 2004–2009 · leading case: Sandusky Cnty. Democratic Party v. Blackwell, 387 F.3d 565 (6th Cir. 2004).
Sandusky Cnty. Democratic Party v. Blackwell, 387 F.3d 565 (6th Cir. 2004). “See 42 U.S.C. § 15484 . HAVA is quintessential^ about being able to cast a provisional ballot.”
Kuznik v. Westmoreland Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 902 A.2d 476 (Pa. 2006). “42 U.S.C. § 15484 . Pursuant to Section 15485, State election officials in Pennsylvania have concluded that “HAVA requires the replacement of lever voting machines,” RR at 326a, and that the EVS units must be used in elections for both state and local offices.”
Kuznik v. Westmoreland Cnty. Bd. of Com'rs, 902 A.2d 476 (Pa. 2006). “42 U.S.C. § 15484 . Pursuant to Section 15485, State election officials in Pennsylvania have concluded that "HAVA requires the replacement of lever voting machines," RR at 326a, and that the EVS units must be used in elections for both state and local offices.”
State Ex Rel. League v. Herrera, 203 P.3d 94 (N.M. 2009). “" 42 U.S.C. § 15484 . Making this idea even more explicit, and applying it generally to the entire statute is the following Section: "The specific choices on the methods of complying with the requirements of [ 42 U.”
State ex rel. League of Women Voters v. Herrera, 2009 NMSC 003 (N.M. 2009). “” 42 U.S.C. § 15484 . Making this idea even more explicit, and applying it generally to the entire statute is the following Section: “The specific choices on the methods of complying with the requirements of [ 42 U.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.