42 U.S.C. § 15301

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 76 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2003–2022 · leading case: Florida State Conf. of the Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Browning, 522 F.3d 1153 (11th Cir. 2008).
Florida State Conf. of the Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Browning, 522 F.3d 1153 (11th Cir. 2008). · cites it 4× “1706 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 15301 et seq.) ("HAVA"). Title III of HAVA, pertinent to this appeal, imposes a set of requirements upon the states in the areas of voter registration *1156 and election administration.”
League of Women Voters of Ohio v. Brunner, 548 F.3d 463 (6th Cir. 2008). · cites it 3× “The League also alleges a violation of the Help America Vote Act of 2002 (“HAVA”), 42 U.S.C. § 15301 et seq, 6 Accordingly, the League seeks preliminary and permanent injunctive relief requiring the Secretary and Governor “[t]o promulgate, adopt, and enforce uniform stan *470…”
Jesus Gonzalez v. State of Arizona, 677 F.3d 383 (9th Cir. 2012). · cites it 2× “As designed by the EAC (and subsequently modified by HAVA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 15301 et seq.), the Federal Form is a postcard.”
Ohio Repub. Party v. Brunner, 543 F.3d 357 (6th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “See Help Americans Vote Act of 2002 ("HAVA"), 42 U.S.C. § 15301 , et seq. and U.S. CONST.”
Kuznik v. Westmoreland Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 902 A.2d 476 (Pa. 2006). · cites it 3× “42 U.S.C. § 15301 (b)(1). Of the $650,000,000.”
Crawford v. Marion Cnty. Election Bd., 553 U.S. 181 (2008). “1666 , 42 U. S. C. § 15301 et seq. (2000 ed., Supp.”
Kuznik v. Westmoreland Cnty. Bd. of Com'rs, 902 A.2d 476 (Pa. 2006). · cites it 3× “42 U.S.C. § 15301 (b)(1). Of the $650,000,000.”
David Snyder v. J. King etal, 745 F.3d 242 (7th Cir. 2014). · cites it 2× “§ 1973gg; the Help America Vote Act of 2002, 42 U.S.C. § 15301 ; the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.”
Maryland Green Party v. Maryland Bd. of Elections, 832 A.2d 214 (Md. 2003). · cites it 2× “, and the Help America Vote Act of 2002, 42 U.S.C. § 15301 et seq., "compel[ ] states to establish a process for removing the names of certain ineligible voters from voter registration lists used in federal elections" and that "[a]t least for federal elections, [the] .”
Ohio Ex Rel. Skaggs v. Brunner, 549 F.3d 468 (6th Cir. 2008). “1666 , 1706 (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 15301 et seg.), leaves no doubt which lawmaking body-the federal or state governments-has plenary authority over the counting of provisional ballots.”
Ohio Repub. Party v. Brunner, 544 F.3d 711 (6th Cir. 2008). · cites it 4× “1666 (2002) (codified at 42 U.S.C. § 15301 et seq. ), helps Americans cast votes and helps to ensure that their votes count in two distinct respects.”
Bysiewicz v. Dinardo, 6 A.3d 726 (Conn. 2010). · cites it 2× “Finally, the plaintiff has been heavily involved in implementing the Help America Vote Act of 2002, 42 U.S.C. § 15301 et seq., actions which required interpreting federal law and advising state legislators and others of her conclusions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.