42 U.S.C. § 1973gg

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 114 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1994–2021 · leading case: Jesus Gonzalez v. State of Arizona, 677 F.3d 383 (9th Cir. 2012).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Jesus Gonzalez v. State of Arizona, 677 F.3d 383 (9th Cir. 2012). · cites it 7× “§ 1973 , is unconstitutional under the Fourteenth or Twenty-fourth Amendments to the Consti- tution, or is void as inconsistent with the National Voter Reg- istration Act of 1993 (NVRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973gg et seq. We uphold Proposition 200’s requirement that voters show…”

Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Ariz., Inc., 133 S. Ct. 2247 (2013). · cites it 6× “42 U. S. C. §1973gg–4(a)(1). That “Federal Form,” devel- oped by the federal Election Assistance Commission (EAC), requires only that an applicant aver, under penalty of perjury, that he is a cit- izen.”

Maria Gonzalez v. State of Arizona, 624 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2010). · cites it 9× “§ 1973 , is unconstitutional under the Fourteenth or Twenty-fourth Amendments of the Constitution, or is void as inconsistent with the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg et seq. We hold that the NVRA supersedes Proposition 200’s voter registration…”

Voting for Am., Inc. v. John Steen, 732 F.3d 382 (5th Cir. 2013). · cites it 4× “12-40914 violating the National Voter Registration Act (“NVRA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973gg et seq. A motions panel of this court granted a stay pending appeal.”

Crawford v. Marion Cnty. Election Bd., 553 U.S. 181 (2008). · cites it 2× “77 , 42 U. S. C. §1973gg et seq., Congress estab- lished procedures that would both increase the number of registered voters and protect the integrity of the electoral process.”

Voting for Am., Inc. v. Hope Andrade, 488 F. App'x 890 (5th Cir. 2012). · cites it 7× “Appellees made two basic challenges to the various sections of the VDR Law: violations of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and violations of the National Voter Registration Act (“NVRA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973gg et seq. Specifically, they contend that their right…”

Maryland Green Party v. Maryland Bd. of Elections, 832 A.2d 214 (Md. 2003). · cites it 4× “The Board argues that the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg et seq., and the Help America Vote Act of 2002, 42 U.”

Orr v. Edgar, 670 N.E.2d 1243 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996). · cites it 9× “42 U.S.C. §§ 1973gg—2, 1973gg—3 (1994). In addition, NVRA permitted registration by mail (42 U.”

Florida State Conf. of the Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Browning, 522 F.3d 1153 (11th Cir. 2008). · cites it 2× “1079 ; see also 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg(a)(1)-(3) ("[T]he right of citizens of the United States to vote is a fundamental right," and "it is the duty of the Federal, State, and local governments to promote the exercise of that right" because "discriminatory and unfair registration…”

Luther Scott, Jr. v. Tom Schedler, 826 F.3d 207 (5th Cir. 2016). · cites it 2× “As to any program for which the Secretary has not achieved substantial compliance with the provisions of the National Voter Registration Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg, et. seq.,[ 3 ] the Secretary is directed .”

Proj. Vote/Voting for Am., Inc. v. Long, 682 F.3d 331 (4th Cir. 2012). · cites it 3× “Notably, the statute is entitled the “National Voter Registration Act,” 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg note (emphasis added), and is codified under a subchapter designated “National Voter Registration,” id.”

United States Student Ass'n Found. v. Land, 546 F.3d 373 (6th Cir. 2008). · cites it 4× “BACKGROUND This case raises the question of whether Michigan's procedures applying to voters whose ID cards are returned to the state as undeliverable violate the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 ("NVRA"), 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg et seq. Currently, when a voter's ID card is…”

Show all 114 citing cases →

— 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg(6)(a) — 1 case

Democratic Nat'l Comm. v. Repub. Nat'l Comm., 671 F. Supp. 2d 575 (D.N.J. 2009).

— 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg(9)(b) — 1 case

Pepper v. Darnell, 24 F. App'x 460 (6th Cir. 2001).

— 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg(a) — 17 cases

Voting for Am., Inc. v. Hope Andrade, 488 F. App'x 890 (5th Cir. 2012). “Appellees made two basic challenges to the various sections of the VDR Law: violations of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution and violations of the National Voter Registration Act (“NVRA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973gg et seq. Specifically, they contend that their right…”

Maria Gonzalez v. State of Arizona, 624 F.3d 1162 (9th Cir. 2010). “§ 1973 , is unconstitutional under the Fourteenth or Twenty-fourth Amendments of the Constitution, or is void as inconsistent with the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg et seq. We hold that the NVRA supersedes Proposition 200’s voter registration…”

Proj. Vote/Voting for Am., Inc. v. Long, 682 F.3d 331 (4th Cir. 2012). “Notably, the statute is entitled the “National Voter Registration Act,” 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg note (emphasis added), and is codified under a subchapter designated “National Voter Registration,” id.”

True the Vote v. Hosemann, 43 F. Supp. 3d 693 (S.D. Miss. 2014).

Georgia State Conf. of Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Kemp, 841 F. Supp. 2d 1320 (N.D. Ga. 2012).

— 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg(a)(1) — 1 case

Florida State Conf. of the Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Browning, 522 F.3d 1153 (11th Cir. 2008). “1079 ; see also 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg(a)(1)-(3) ("[T]he right of citizens of the United States to vote is a fundamental right," and "it is the duty of the Federal, State, and local governments to promote the exercise of that right" because "discriminatory and unfair registration…”

— 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg(a)(2) — 4 cases

True the Vote v. Hosemann, 43 F. Supp. 3d 693 (S.D. Miss. 2014).

Dobrovolny v. Nebraska, 100 F. Supp. 2d 1012 (D. Neb. 2000).

Nat'l Coalition for Students with Disabilities Educ. & Legal Def. Fund v. Scales, 150 F. Supp. 2d 845 (D. Maryland 2001).

Nat Coal. for Students With Disabilities v. Scales, 150 F. Supp. 2d 845 (D. Maryland 2001).

— 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg(a)(3) — 8 cases

League of Women Voters of Florida v. Cobb, 447 F. Supp. 2d 1314 (S.D. Fla. 2006).

Common Cause of Colorado v. Buescher, 750 F. Supp. 2d 1259 (D. Colo. 2010).

Condon v. Reno, 913 F. Supp. 946 (D.S.C. 1995).

United States v. Greer, 900 F. Supp. 952 (N.D. Ill. 1995).

Ortiz v. City of Philadelphia Off. of the City Commissioners Voter Reg. Div., 28 F.3d 306 (3rd Cir. 1994).

— 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg(a)(l) — 2 cases

Condon v. Reno, 913 F. Supp. 946 (D.S.C. 1995).

— 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg(b) — 23 cases

Jesus Gonzalez v. State of Arizona, 677 F.3d 383 (9th Cir. 2012). “§ 1973 , is unconstitutional under the Fourteenth or Twenty-fourth Amendments to the Consti- tution, or is void as inconsistent with the National Voter Reg- istration Act of 1993 (NVRA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973gg et seq. We uphold Proposition 200’s requirement that voters show…”

Karla Vanessa Arcia v. Florida Sec'y of State, 772 F.3d 1335 (11th Cir. 2014).

Am. Ass'n of People With Disabilities v. Herrera, 580 F. Supp. 2d 1195 (D.N.M. 2008).

Kobach v. United States Election Assistance Comm'n, 772 F.3d 1183 (10th Cir. 2014).

— 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg(b)(1) — 8 cases

Maryland Green Party v. Maryland Bd. of Elections, 832 A.2d 214 (Md. 2003). “The Board argues that the National Voter Registration Act of 1993, 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg et seq., and the Help America Vote Act of 2002, 42 U.”

Johnson v. DeSoto Cnty. Bd. of Commissioners, 204 F.3d 1335 (11th Cir. 2000).

Orr v. Edgar, 670 N.E.2d 1243 (Ill. App. Ct. 1996). “42 U.S.C. §§ 1973gg—2, 1973gg—3 (1994). In addition, NVRA permitted registration by mail (42 U.”

League of Women Voters of Mo. v. Ashcroft, 336 F. Supp. 3d 998 (E.D. Mo. 2018).

Pacuilla v. Cochise Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 923 P.2d 833 (Ariz. 1996).

— 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg(b)(2) — 3 cases

Nat'l Coalition for Students with Disabilities Educ. & Legal Def. Fund v. Scales, 150 F. Supp. 2d 845 (D. Maryland 2001).

United States v. State of New York, 700 F. Supp. 2d 186 (N.D.N.Y. 2010).

Nat Coal. for Students With Disabilities v. Scales, 150 F. Supp. 2d 845 (D. Maryland 2001).

— 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg(b)(2)(A) — 1 case

Gonzalez v. Arizona, 435 F. Supp. 2d 997 (D. Ariz. 2006).

— 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg(b)(3) — 1 case

Peace & Freedom Party v. Shelley, 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 376 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004).

— 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg(b)(l) — 14 cases

Georgia State Conf. of Nat'l Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Kemp, 841 F. Supp. 2d 1320 (N.D. Ga. 2012).

League of Women Voters of Florida v. Browning, 575 F. Supp. 2d 1298 (S.D. Fla. 2008).

North Carolina State Conf. of the NAACP v. McCrory, 997 F. Supp. 2d 322 (M.D.N.C. 2014).

Bell v. Marinko, 235 F. Supp. 2d 772 (N.D. Ohio 2002).

Condon v. Reno, 913 F. Supp. 946 (D.S.C. 1995).

— 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg(d) — 2 cases

United States Student Ass'n Found. v. Land, 546 F.3d 373 (6th Cir. 2008). “BACKGROUND This case raises the question of whether Michigan's procedures applying to voters whose ID cards are returned to the state as undeliverable violate the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 ("NVRA"), 42 U.S.C. § 1973gg et seq. Currently, when a voter's ID card is…”

United States Student Ass'n Found. v. Terri Land (6th Cir. 2008).

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.