42 U.S.C. § 3755
Transferred
[transferred]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases, 2017–2020 · leading case: City of Chicago v. Sessions, 264 F. Supp. 3d 933 (N.D. Ill. 2017).
City of Chicago v. Sessions, 264 F. Supp. 3d 933 (N.D. Ill. 2017). “§ 10156 (formerly 42 U.S.C. § 3755 ). Each state’s allocation is keyed to its population and the amouiit of reported violent crimes.”
City of Philadelphia v. Sessions, 280 F. Supp. 3d 579 (E.D. Pa. 2017). “§ 10156 (formerly 42 U.S.C. § 3755 ). The Attorney Generaí has limited the eligibility of applicant jurisdictions to JÁG Program funds for many years, by imposing various conditions.”
City of Chicago v. William P. Barr (7th Cir. 2020). “§ 10156 (formerly 42 U.S.C. § 3755 ), and the amount received by a spe- cific state or locality is dependent on the calculations related to the other states and localities.”
City of Chicago v. William P. Barr (7th Cir. 2020). “§ 10156 (formerly 42 U.S.C. § 3755 ), and the amount received by a spe- cific state or locality is dependent on the calculations related to the other states and localities.”
City of Chicago v. William P. Barr (7th Cir. 2020). “§ 10156 (formerly 42 U.S.C. § 3755 ), and the amount received by a spe- cific state or locality is dependent on the calculations related to the other states and localities.”
City of Chicago v. William P. Barr (7th Cir. 2020). “§ 10156 (formerly 42 U.S.C. § 3755 ), and the amount received by a spe- cific state or locality is dependent on the calculations related to the other states and localities.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.