U.S. Code » Title 42 » Chapter CHAPTER 95— UNITED STATES SYNTHETIC FUELS CORPORATION › Subchapter SUBCHAPTER X— TERMINATION OF CORPORATION

42 U.S.C. § 7405

SALARIES AND COMPENSATION RIGHTS.

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 42 CasesGoogle Scholar
“(a) The Director of the Office of Personnel Management shall, before February 1, 1986, determine the amount of compensation or benefits which each Director, officer, or employee of the Corporation shall be legally entitled to under any contract as of the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 7, 1986].“(b) Effective on the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 7, 1986], no change in any Director, officer, or employee compensation or benefits shall be allowed or permitted, unless the Director of the Office of Personnel Management agrees that such change is reasonable.“(c) Effective on the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 7, 1986]—“(1) no officer or employee of the Corporation shall receive a salary in excess of the rate of basic pay payable for level IV of the Executive Schedule under title 5 of the United States Code; and“(2) the Corporation shall not waive any requirements in its By-Laws which are necessary for a Director, officer, or employee to qualify for pension or termination benefits under the By-Laws and written personnel policies and procedures in effect on the date of enactment of this Act [Apr. 7, 1986].
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1991–1996 · leading case: Illinois Env't Prot. Agency v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 947 F.2d 283 (7th Cir. 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Illinois Env't Prot. Agency v. United States Env't Prot. Agency, 947 F.2d 283 (7th Cir. 1991). · cites it 5× “” 42 U.S.C. § 7405 (a)(1)(A). Grants made under the Act are conditional; the Administrator “may make grants,” id.”
United States v. Louisiana Pac. Corp., 925 F. Supp. 1484 (D. Colo. 1996). “These reviews are tied to annual grants of money from the EPA under 42 U.S.C. § 7405 . Wright , however, is distinct from this case because the water quality data reports were required by EPA regulations and were in place and effective at the time of the alleged false statement.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.