49 U.S.C. § 303
AGREEMENT FOR A UNITED STATES-CANADA BILATERAL COMMISSION.
“The President is authorized and urged to enter into an agreement with the Government of Canada to establish an independent joint commission to study the feasibility and advisability of linking the rail system in Alaska to the nearest appropriate point on the North American continental rail system.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 599
cases (24 in the last 5 years), 1912–2025 · leading case: City of Dania Beach v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 628 F.3d 581 (D.C. Cir. 2010).
City of Dania Beach v. Fed. Aviation Admin., 628 F.3d 581 (D.C. Cir. 2010). “§ 47106 (c)(1)(B), a part of the AAIA, which conditions FAA approval, when a project such as the county's is shown to have certain adverse environmental impacts, on a finding that there is no "possible and prudent" alternative; (2) § 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act…”
Defenders of Wildlife v. North Carolina Dep't of Transp., 762 F.3d 374 (4th Cir. 2014). “1835 , Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act of 1966, 49 U.S.C. § 303 , imposes substantive restraints on an agency’s action.”
Davis v. Mineta, 302 F.3d 1104 (10th Cir. 2002). “§ 4332 (C) and § 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 303 (c) when they prepared an inadequate Environmental Assessment (“EA”) and then proceeded to issue a Finding of No Significant Impact (“FONSI”) rather than an Environmental Impact Statement (“EIS”).”
California v. Zook, 336 U.S. 725 (1949). “921 , 49 U.S.C. §§ 303 (b) (9) and 311 (a). The federal control was coextensive with the problem and carefully adjusted to it.”
Save Our Sound OBX, Inc. v. NC Dept of Transp., 914 F.3d 213 (4th Cir. 2019). “" See 49 U.S.C. § 303 (c). However, as the district court explained, SOS cannot contend that it was challenging the adequacy of the 2016 ROD's treatment of the shipwreck when its claims "rest[ ] upon recent discovery that the Pappy['s] Lane Wreck contains a World War II vessel.”
United States v. Drum, 368 U.S. 370 (1962). “§ 304 (c), [1] the Interstate Commerce Commission held that appellees who leased their motor vehicles and hired *372 their services as drivers to the appellee Oklahoma Furniture Manufacturing Company (hereinafter "Oklahoma") were contract carriers within 49 U. S. C. § 303 (a)…”
City of Olmsted Falls, Ohio v. Fed. Aviation Admin. & Dep't of Transp., City of Cleveland, Ohio, Intervenor, 292 F.3d 261 (D.C. Cir. 2002). “(“NEPA”); and Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 303 (c) (“DOT Act”). Olmsted Falls also argues that a supplemental environmental impact statement is required under NEPA.”
Am. Farm Lines v. Black Ball Freight Serv., 397 U.S. 532 (1970). “448 , 49 U. S. C. § 303 (b) (5) (1964 ed., Supp.”
Coalition for Underground Expansion v. Mineta, 333 F.3d 193 (D.C. Cir. 2003). “§§ 470 to 470x-6, 3 and section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act (DOTA), 49 U.S.C. § 303 (c). 4 *196 The district court dismissed the complaint on two alternate grounds: (1) the Coalition lacked standing because “the myriad injuries alleged by plaintiffs are in no…”
North Idaho Cmty. Action Network v. United States Dep't of Transp., 545 F.3d 1147 (9th Cir. 2008). “, and Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 303 (c). We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with instructions.”
City of Phoenix, Arizona v. Michael Huerta, 869 F.3d 963 (D.C. Cir. 2017). “” 49 U.S.C. § 303 (a). To that end, the FAA’s regulations require it to consult “all appropriate .”
St. John's United Church of Christ v. City of Chicago, 502 F.3d 616 (7th Cir. 2007). “, § 4(f) of the Department of Transportation Act, 49 U.S.C. § 303 (c), as well as provisions of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.”
— 49 U.S.C. § 303(10) — 1 case
Jones Motor Co. v. United States, 223 F. Supp. 835 (E.D. Pa. 1963).
— 49 U.S.C. § 303(19) — 1 case
United States v. Mut. Trucking Co., 141 F.2d 655 (6th Cir. 1944).
— 49 U.S.C. § 303(a) — 14 cases
J. B. Montgomery, Inc. v. United States, 206 F. Supp. 455 (D. Colo. 1962).
Great N. Ry. Co. v. Thompson, 222 F. Supp. 573 (D.N.D. 1963).
JT Transp. Co. v. United States, 185 F. Supp. 838 (W.D. Mo. 1960).
Interstate Com. Comm'n v. Aaa Con Drivers Exch., Inc., Irving Zola & Helen Zola, & Aaa Con Drivers Exch.-L. A., Inc., 340 F.2d 820 (2d Cir. 1965).
Boyes v. State, 445 P.2d 861 (Ariz. Ct. App. 1968).
— 49 U.S.C. § 303(b) — 9 cases
W. Willard Wirtz, Sec'y of Labor, United States Dep't of Labor v. Ti Ti Peat Humus Co., Inc., a Corp., 373 F.2d 209 (4th Cir. 1967).
Cont'l Bus Sys., Inc. v. City of Dallas, 386 F. Supp. 359 (N.D. Tex. 1974).
City of Philadelphia v. Civil Aeronautics Bd., the Flying Tiger Line, Inc., Intervenor, 289 F.2d 770 (D.C. Cir. 1961).
Bass v. United States, 163 F. Supp. 1 (W.D. Va. 1958).
Home Transfer & Storage Co. v. United States, 141 F. Supp. 599 (W.D. Wash. 1956).
— 49 U.S.C. § 303(c) — 3 cases
Locust Cartage Co., Inc. v. Transamerican Freight Lines, Inc., 430 F.2d 334 (1st Cir. 1970).
Quince Orchard Valley Citizens Ass'n v. Hodel, 872 F.2d 75 (4th Cir. 1989).
United States v. Infinger Transp. Co., 316 F. Supp. 124 (D.S.C. 1970).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.