50 U.S.C. § 403g

Transferred

Read at: OLRCuscode.house.gov CornellLII GovInfogovinfo.gov JustiaTitle 50 CasesGoogle Scholar

[transferred]

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 107 cases, 1966–2019 · leading case: Nat'l Sec. Counselors v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 960 F. Supp. 2d 101 (D.D.C. 2013).
Nat'l Sec. Counselors v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 960 F. Supp. 2d 101 (D.D.C. 2013). · cites it 35× “41 Specifically, the plaintiff *174 challenges (1) the CIA’s Exemption 3 with-holdings made under the authority of Section 6 of the CIA Act, 50 U.S.C. § 403g, in all three cases, (2) the DIA’s Exemption 3 withholdings made under the authority of the National Security Act, 50 U.”
Susan D. Goland & Patricia B. Skidmore v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 607 F.2d 339 (D.C. Cir. 1978). · cites it 4× “Whether the deleted portions of the Hillenkoetter Statement were properly withheld is perhaps more clearly and briefly stated under Exemption 3 than under Exemption 1, hence we reach Judge Hart’s conclusion by a different path.”
Harriet Ann Phillippi v. Cent. Intelligence Agency & George H. Bush, Dir., Cent. Intelligence Agency, 546 F.2d 1009 (D.C. Cir. 1976). · cites it 5× “50 U.S.C. § 403g provides, in relevant part, that [i]n the interests of the security of the foreign intelligence activities of the United States and in order further to implement the proviso of section 403(d)(3) of this title that the Director of Central Intelligence shall be…”
David D. MINIER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Cent. INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, Defendant-Appellee, 88 F.3d 796 (9th Cir. 1996). · cites it 6× “Because the CIA is exempted from disclosing agent names under the plain language of 50 U.S.C. §§ 403g and 403-3(c)(5), we affirm.”
Military Audit Proj., Felice D. Cohen, Morton H. Halperin v. William Casey, Dir. of Cent. Intelligence, 656 F.2d 724 (D.C. Cir. 1981). · cites it 2× “” Pursuant to section 102(d)(3), 50 U.S.C. § 403g provides that “in order further to implement the proviso of section 403(d)(3) of this title that the Director of Central Intelligence shall be responsible for protecting intelligence sources and methods from unauthorized…”
Morton H. Halperin v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 629 F.2d 144 (D.C. Cir. 1980). · cites it 3× “As an additional ground of decision under Exemption 3, the court found information about legal fees and similar agency expenditures in the nature of salaries to be specifically exempted by section 6 of the Central Intelligence Agency Act, 50 U.S.C. § 403g (1976). 3 Plaintiff…”
Cent. Intelligence Agency v. Sims, 471 U.S. 159 (1985). · cites it 2× “See 50 U. S. C. § 403g (exempting from disclosure requirements the organization, functions, names, official titles, salaries, or numbers of personnel employed by the Agency); Central Intelligence Agency Information Act, Pub.”
Hall v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 881 F. Supp. 2d 38 (D.D.C. 2012). · cites it 3× “, the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949, 50 U.S.C. § 403g, Section 102A(i)(l) of the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004, 50 U.”
Amnesty Int'l USA v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 728 F. Supp. 2d 479 (S.D.N.Y. 2010). · cites it 3× “The amendments made by the IRTPA transferred the authority for protecting intelligence from the Director of the CIA to the DNI. 5 Section 6 of the CIA Act authorizes the CIA to withhold information that would disclose “the organization, functions, names, official titles,…”
Larson v. Dep't of State, 565 F.3d 857 (D.C. Cir. 2009). “” 50 U.S.C. § 403g. Portillo-Bartow does not contest the applicability of this exemption to withhold internal CIA organizational data in the cables.”
John Cary Sims v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, 642 F.2d 562 (D.C. Cir. 1980). · cites it 3× “Against this background, the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1949, and particularly Section 7 of that Act, 50 U.S.C. § 403g (1976), assumes some significance.”
Whalen v. U.S. Marine Corps, 407 F. Supp. 2d 54 (D.D.C. 2005). · cites it 3× “Second, the CIA relies on section 6 of the Central Intelligence Agency Act of 1947, codified as amended at 50 U.S.C. § 403g, which provides that the CIA is exempt from the provision of any other law requiring the disclosure and/or publication of the organization, function,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.