Utah Code » Title 13, Chapter 11 — Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act
Utah Code

Utah Code § 13-11-1 (2026)

Citation of act

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act."

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 62 cases (36 in the last 5 years), 1985–2026 · leading case: Schurtz v. BMW of North Am., Inc., 814 P.2d 1108 (Utah 1991).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Schurtz v. BMW of North Am., Inc., 814 P.2d 1108 (Utah 1991). · cites it 8× “§§ 70A-2-715 and -719 (1990); and (ii) negligent and/or intentional misrepresentation, in violation of the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act, Utah Code Ann. §§ 13-11-1 to -23 (1990). The district court entered an order granting defendant BMW partial summary judgment, disallowing…”
Wade v. Jobe, 818 P.2d 1006 (Utah 1991). · cites it 8× “The tenant filed a counterclaim, seeking an offset against rent owed because of the uninhabitable condition of the premises and seeking damages, attorney fees, and declaratory relief under the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act, Utah Code Ann. §§ 13-11-1 to -23. The tenant also…”
Carlie v. Morgan, 922 P.2d 1 (Utah 1996). · cites it 4× “§§ 57-12-1 to -13; (ii) Daryl McDonald, the owner of the apartment building, for violating the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act ("UCSPA"), Utah Code Ann. §§ 13-11-1 to -23; and (iii) Joe Destafino, the manager of the apartment building, for violating the UCSPA *3 and breaching…”
Burnett v. Mortg. Elec. Reg. Sys., Inc., 706 F.3d 1231 (10th Cir. 2013). “, the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act (USCPA), Utah Code Ann. § 13-11-1 et seq., and related claims arising out of the foreclosure of her home.”
Toone v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 716 F.3d 516 (10th Cir. 2013). “) The Toones asserted claims for (1) declaratory judgment (in essence, challenging the foreclosure process); (2) violations of the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act (UCS-PA), Utah Code Ann. §§ 13-11-1 to-23 (1973); (3) breach of the trustee’s duty of good faith and fair dealing…”
Sevy v. Sec. Title Co. of S. Utah, 902 P.2d 629 (Utah 1995). · cites it 2× “ATTORNEY FEES The Sevys contend that the court of appeals erred in overturning the trial court’s ruling that they were entitled to attorney fees under the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act, Utah Code Ann. §§ 13-11-1 to -23, for bringing this action.”
Rawson v. Conover, 2001 UT 24 (Utah 2001). · cites it 2× “See Utah Code Ann. §§ 13-11-1 to -23 (1999 & Supp.”
XMission, LC v. PureHealth Rsch., 105 F.4th 1300 (10th Cir. 2024). “XMission also alleged PureHealth violated Utah’s Consumer Sales Practices Act, Utah Code Ann. § 13-11-1 , by misrepresenting its products in its promotional emails.”
Fell v. Alco Capital Grp., 2023 UT App 127 (Utah Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “The court’s summary judgment ruling resulted in dismissal of Appellants’ suit, which was premised on their pivotal contention that Alco engaged in “deceptive” and “unconscionable” acts and practices in violation of the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act (the UCSPA), see generally…”
Andreason v. Felsted, 2006 UT App 188 (Utah Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 2× “The only claims remaining are those of fraudulent misrepresentation and violation of the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act (the UCSPA), Utah Code Ann. §§ 13-11-1 to -23 (2005). Andreason filed a motion for partial summary judgment on liability, asserting that under the doctrine…”
Meneses v. Salander Enter., 2023 UT App 117 (Utah Ct. App. 2023). · cites it 2× “See Utah Code §§ 13-11-1 to -23. Specifically, the Meneses Parties argued that Salander had engaged in debt collection “against vulnerable Utah consumers without the mandatory license required” by the UCAA.”
State Ex Rel. Div. of Consum. Prot. v. GAF Corp., 760 P.2d 310 (Utah 1988). · cites it 2× “The Division’s complaint alleges that GAF committed a deceptive act or practice against a Utah consumer in violation of the Utah Consumer Sales Practices Act, Utah Code Ann. §§ 13-11-1 to -23 (Supp.1983).”
Show all 62 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.