Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504 (2026)

Appeals to the Environmental Division

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 8504)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 421 cases (58 in the last 5 years), 2005–2026 · leading case: In Re Verizon Wireless Barton Permit, 2010 VT 62 (Vt. 2010).
In Re Verizon Wireless Barton Permit, 2010 VT 62 (Vt. 2010). · cites it 21× “The court explained that neighbors could not claim party status under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1) because they did not participate in the proceedings before the municipal panel within the relevant time frame.”
In re Mahar Conditional Use Permit (Mary Lahiff, Carolyn Hallock, Susan Harritt & William Butler, Appellants), 183 A.3d 1136 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 5× “10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1) ("Within 30 days of the date of the act or decision, an interested person, as defined in 24 V.”
In re Snowstone Stormwater Discharge Authorization (Michael Harrington, Appellants), 2021 VT 36 (Vt. 2021). · cites it 5× “Snowstone moved to dismiss neighbors’ appeal and statement of questions, arguing that neighbors lacked standing under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(a) to raise the legal issues presented in questions 1-18, 22, 26, and 28 (all dealing with the ANR Authorization to proceed under a MSGP).”
In re SP Land Co., LLC, Act 250 LUP Amendment, 2011 VT 104 (Vt. 2011). · cites it 4× “They contend that Mountainside was granted party status only on the question of whether it should be joined as a co-applicant and point to the language of 10 V.S.A. § 8504(d)(1), which states that a person appealing an act or decision made by a district commission “may only…”
In re Appeal of MDY Taxes, Inc. & Vill. Car Wash, Inc., 2015 VT 65 (Vt. 2015). · cites it 8× “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1). Thus, participation in the municipal regulatory proceeding below is ordinarily required in order to have standing to appeal.”
In re Treetop Dev. Co. Act 250 Dev. (Treetop at Stratton Condo. Assn., Inc., Appellant), 2016 VT 20 (Vt. 2016). · cites it 3× “10 V.S.A. § 8504(a). ¶ 12. In order to ensure continued compliance with the statutory criteria, the Commission is entitled to grant conditional approval by imposing reasonable conditions on a project.”
In Re DJK, LLC WW & WS Permit (Ralph Crowley & Joanne Crowley, Appellants), 2024 VT 34 (Vt. 2024). · cites it 3× “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(a). Questions about easements could fall outside of this jurisdiction, as they did in Britting, where the plaintiff requested what amounted to an advisory opinion about the legal duty to obtain an easement.”
In re Mathez Act 250 LU Permit (Sung-Hee Chung, Appellant), 192 A.3d 400 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 3× “On September 2, 2016, applicants appealed the second notice to the Environmental Division under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(a), which authorizes direct appeals of District Commission decisions to the Environmental Division.”
In re Carrigan Conditional Use & Certificate of Compliance, Certificate of Occupancy, Certificate of Compliance, 2014 VT 125 (Vt. 2014). · cites it 3× “R 5(d)(2) (stating that appellant claiming party status under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1), which applies to zoning appeals, is “automatically accorded that status” when notice of appeal is filed, unless court dismisses party based on motion).”
In re Waterfront Park Act 250 Amendment (Alison Lockwood, Appellant), 2016 VT 39 (Vt. 2016). · cites it 2× “Neighbor appealed the amended land use permit to the Environmental Division pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8504. On appeal before the Environmental Division, the City and neighbor filed cross-motions for summary judgment on the threshold question of whether the City was entitled to…”
In re Route 103 Quarry, 2007 VT 66 (Vt. 2007). · cites it 3× “We need not parse the language of that rule regarding automatic stays because we conclude that 10 V.S.A. § 8504(f) controls and establishes discretionary stays in appeals not only to, but also from, the Environmental Court.”
In Re Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee Discharge Permit 3-1199, 2009 VT 124 (Vt. 2009). · cites it 2× “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(h). The rules promulgated for the Environmental Court also lay out the appropriate standard of review: In an appeal by trial de novo, all questions of law or fact as to which review is available shall be tried to the court, which shall apply the substantive…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(11): 1 case
JLD Prop. St. Albans Wal Mart (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(2)(A): 1 case
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(B)(1): 1 case
PCH, Inc. PCG, Inc Bldg. Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(B)(i): 1 case
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(B)(ii): 1 case
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(a): 63 cases
In re Snowstone Stormwater Discharge Authorization (Michael Harrington, Appellants), 2021 VT 36 (Vt. 2021). “Snowstone moved to dismiss neighbors’ appeal and statement of questions, arguing that neighbors lacked standing under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(a) to raise the legal issues presented in questions 1-18, 22, 26, and 28 (all dealing with the ANR Authorization to proceed under a MSGP).”
In re Treetop Dev. Co. Act 250 Dev. (Treetop at Stratton Condo. Assn., Inc., Appellant), 2016 VT 20 (Vt. 2016). “10 V.S.A. § 8504(a). ¶ 12. In order to ensure continued compliance with the statutory criteria, the Commission is entitled to grant conditional approval by imposing reasonable conditions on a project.”
In re Mathez Act 250 LU Permit (Sung-Hee Chung, Appellant), 192 A.3d 400 (Vt. 2018). “On September 2, 2016, applicants appealed the second notice to the Environmental Division under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(a), which authorizes direct appeals of District Commission decisions to the Environmental Division.”
In Re DJK, LLC WW & WS Permit (Ralph Crowley & Joanne Crowley, Appellants), 2024 VT 34 (Vt. 2024). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(a). Questions about easements could fall outside of this jurisdiction, as they did in Britting, where the plaintiff requested what amounted to an advisory opinion about the legal duty to obtain an easement.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(b): 18 cases
Goddard Coll. CU (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(b)(1): 54 cases
In Re Verizon Wireless Barton Permit, 2010 VT 62 (Vt. 2010). “The court explained that neighbors could not claim party status under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1) because they did not participate in the proceedings before the municipal panel within the relevant time frame.”
In re Carrigan Conditional Use & Certificate of Compliance, Certificate of Occupancy, Certificate of Compliance, 2014 VT 125 (Vt. 2014). “R 5(d)(2) (stating that appellant claiming party status under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1), which applies to zoning appeals, is “automatically accorded that status” when notice of appeal is filed, unless court dismisses party based on motion).”
In re Mahar Conditional Use Permit (Mary Lahiff, Carolyn Hallock, Susan Harritt & William Butler, Appellants), 183 A.3d 1136 (Vt. 2018). “10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1) ("Within 30 days of the date of the act or decision, an interested person, as defined in 24 V.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(b)(2): 17 cases
In Re Verizon Wireless Barton Permit, 2010 VT 62 (Vt. 2010). “The court explained that neighbors could not claim party status under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1) because they did not participate in the proceedings before the municipal panel within the relevant time frame.”
In re Mahar Conditional Use Permit (Mary Lahiff, Carolyn Hallock, Susan Harritt & William Butler, Appellants), 183 A.3d 1136 (Vt. 2018). “10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1) ("Within 30 days of the date of the act or decision, an interested person, as defined in 24 V.”
In re Appeal of MDY Taxes, Inc. & Vill. Car Wash, Inc., 2015 VT 65 (Vt. 2015). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1). Thus, participation in the municipal regulatory proceeding below is ordinarily required in order to have standing to appeal.”
Mahar CU (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(b)(2)(A): 10 cases
In Re Verizon Wireless Barton Permit, 2010 VT 62 (Vt. 2010). “The court explained that neighbors could not claim party status under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1) because they did not participate in the proceedings before the municipal panel within the relevant time frame.”
In re Appeal of MDY Taxes, Inc. & Vill. Car Wash, Inc., 2015 VT 65 (Vt. 2015). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1). Thus, participation in the municipal regulatory proceeding below is ordinarily required in order to have standing to appeal.”
Cummings Subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(b)(2)(B): 2 cases
RACDC Retention Pond (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Cummings Subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(b)(2)(C): 20 cases
In re Appeal of MDY Taxes, Inc. & Vill. Car Wash, Inc., 2015 VT 65 (Vt. 2015). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1). Thus, participation in the municipal regulatory proceeding below is ordinarily required in order to have standing to appeal.”
Mad River Barn CU (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017).
Jolley Assoc Car Wash Middlebury (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(c): 1 case
G.R. Enter., Inc. Sign Application (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(c)(1): 5 cases
Bergmann Act 250 Subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008).
Sports Venue Found., Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007).
Hovey Act 250 Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(c)(3): 1 case
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d): 10 cases
Bennington Walmart (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Chaves Londonderry Gravel Pit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(1): 21 cases
In re SP Land Co., LLC, Act 250 LUP Amendment, 2011 VT 104 (Vt. 2011). “They contend that Mountainside was granted party status only on the question of whether it should be joined as a co-applicant and point to the language of 10 V.S.A. § 8504(d)(1), which states that a person appealing an act or decision made by a district commission “may only…”
Bennington Walmart (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Orlandi Act 250 Kennel Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(1)(B): 2 cases
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(2): 13 cases
Union Bank Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Bennington Walmart (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(2)(A): 9 cases
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(2)(A)(i): 3 cases
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(2)(A)(ii): 2 cases
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(2)(A)(iii): 3 cases
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(2)(B): 16 cases
Bennington Walmart (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Bennington Wal Mart (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Champlain Parkway Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Union Bank Act 250 Application (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(2)(B)(iv): 1 case
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(2)(C): 4 cases
Union Bank Act 250 Application (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
Granville Mfg Co., Inc. Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Laberge Shooting Range JO (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016).
Bergmann Act 250 Subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(l): 1 case
Granville Mfg Co., Inc. Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(f): 15 cases
In re Route 103 Quarry, 2007 VT 66 (Vt. 2007). “We need not parse the language of that rule regarding automatic stays because we conclude that 10 V.S.A. § 8504(f) controls and establishes discretionary stays in appeals not only to, but also from, the Environmental Court.”
Lathrop Ltd. P'ship I (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(f)(1): 6 cases
Waitasfield Water Supply (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Sheffield Wind Proj. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
N. Comm. Inv. Corp. CU (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007).
Moretown Landfill Recertification (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(f)(1)(B): 2 cases
RACDC Retention Pond (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(f)(2): 8 cases
In re Route 103 Quarry, 2007 VT 66 (Vt. 2007). “We need not parse the language of that rule regarding automatic stays because we conclude that 10 V.S.A. § 8504(f) controls and establishes discretionary stays in appeals not only to, but also from, the Environmental Court.”
Moretown Landfill Recertification (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
Lathrop Ltd. P'ship I (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014).
Mahar CU (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(g): 3 cases
R.L. Vallee, Inc. et a MS4 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017).
Lathrop Ltr P'ship I (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(h): 180 cases
In Re DJK, LLC WW & WS Permit (Ralph Crowley & Joanne Crowley, Appellants), 2024 VT 34 (Vt. 2024). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(a). Questions about easements could fall outside of this jurisdiction, as they did in Britting, where the plaintiff requested what amounted to an advisory opinion about the legal duty to obtain an easement.”
In Re Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee Discharge Permit 3-1199, 2009 VT 124 (Vt. 2009). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(h). The rules promulgated for the Environmental Court also lay out the appropriate standard of review: In an appeal by trial de novo, all questions of law or fact as to which review is available shall be tried to the court, which shall apply the substantive…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(h)(1): 2 cases
D&D Props. LLC CU (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016).
Tasha Tudor & Fam., Inc. CU Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(h)(3): 1 case
In re Waterfront Park Act 250 Amendment (Alison Lockwood, Appellant), 2016 VT 39 (Vt. 2016). “Neighbor appealed the amended land use permit to the Environmental Division pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8504. On appeal before the Environmental Division, the City and neighbor filed cross-motions for summary judgment on the threshold question of whether the City was entitled to…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(i): 8 cases
In Re Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee Discharge Permit 3-1199, 2009 VT 124 (Vt. 2009). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(h). The rules promulgated for the Environmental Court also lay out the appropriate standard of review: In an appeal by trial de novo, all questions of law or fact as to which review is available shall be tried to the court, which shall apply the substantive…”
CLF Stormwater Discharge (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(j): 1 case
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(k)(3): 1 case
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(l): 1 case
Hinesburg Hannaford Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(m): 54 cases
In re Route 103 Quarry, 2007 VT 66 (Vt. 2007). “We need not parse the language of that rule regarding automatic stays because we conclude that 10 V.S.A. § 8504(f) controls and establishes discretionary stays in appeals not only to, but also from, the Environmental Court.”
In re Lathrop Ltd. P'ship I, 199 Vt. 19 (Vt. 2015).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(n): 19 cases
In re Zaremba Grp. Act 250 Permit, 127 A.3d 93 (Vt. 2015).
Lawrence Site Plan Approval (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Lawrence Site Plan Approval (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(n)(1): 6 cases
Appeal of Rivers Dev., LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(n)(2): 9 cases
In re Snowstone Stormwater Discharge Authorization (Michael Harrington, Appellants), 2021 VT 36 (Vt. 2021). “Snowstone moved to dismiss neighbors’ appeal and statement of questions, arguing that neighbors lacked standing under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(a) to raise the legal issues presented in questions 1-18, 22, 26, and 28 (all dealing with the ANR Authorization to proceed under a MSGP).”
Champlain Oil Co McDuff 19-2-16 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(n)(3): 6 cases
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(n)(4): 5 cases
Unified Buddhist Church, Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(n)(5): 13 cases
McCullough Crushing, Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
Zaremba CU - Jericho (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014).
Lawrence Site Plan Approval (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Lawrence Site Plan Approval (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(n)(6): 9 cases
Cummings Subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.