Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 8504)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 421 cases (58 in the last 5 years), 2005–2026 · leading case: In Re Verizon Wireless Barton Permit, 2010 VT 62 (Vt. 2010).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Verizon Wireless Barton Permit, 2010 VT 62 (Vt. 2010). · cites it 21× “The court explained that neighbors could not claim party status under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1) because they did not participate in the proceedings before the municipal panel within the relevant time frame.”
In re Mahar Conditional Use Permit (Mary Lahiff, Carolyn Hallock, Susan Harritt & William Butler, Appellants), 183 A.3d 1136 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 5× “10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1) ("Within 30 days of the date of the act or decision, an interested person, as defined in 24 V.”
In re Snowstone Stormwater Discharge Authorization (Michael Harrington, Appellants), 2021 VT 36 (Vt. 2021). · cites it 5× “Snowstone moved to dismiss neighbors’ appeal and statement of questions, arguing that neighbors lacked standing under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(a) to raise the legal issues presented in questions 1-18, 22, 26, and 28 (all dealing with the ANR Authorization to proceed under a MSGP).”
In re SP Land Co., LLC, Act 250 LUP Amendment, 2011 VT 104 (Vt. 2011). · cites it 4× “They contend that Mountainside was granted party status only on the question of whether it should be joined as a co-applicant and point to the language of 10 V.S.A. § 8504(d)(1), which states that a person appealing an act or decision made by a district commission “may only…”
In re Appeal of MDY Taxes, Inc. & Vill. Car Wash, Inc., 2015 VT 65 (Vt. 2015). · cites it 8× “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1). Thus, participation in the municipal regulatory proceeding below is ordinarily required in order to have standing to appeal.”
In re Treetop Dev. Co. Act 250 Dev. (Treetop at Stratton Condo. Assn., Inc., Appellant), 2016 VT 20 (Vt. 2016). · cites it 3× “10 V.S.A. § 8504(a). ¶ 12. In order to ensure continued compliance with the statutory criteria, the Commission is entitled to grant conditional approval by imposing reasonable conditions on a project.”
In Re DJK, LLC WW & WS Permit (Ralph Crowley & Joanne Crowley, Appellants), 2024 VT 34 (Vt. 2024). · cites it 3× “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(a). Questions about easements could fall outside of this jurisdiction, as they did in Britting, where the plaintiff requested what amounted to an advisory opinion about the legal duty to obtain an easement.”
In re Mathez Act 250 LU Permit (Sung-Hee Chung, Appellant), 192 A.3d 400 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 3× “On September 2, 2016, applicants appealed the second notice to the Environmental Division under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(a), which authorizes direct appeals of District Commission decisions to the Environmental Division.”
In re Carrigan Conditional Use & Certificate of Compliance, Certificate of Occupancy, Certificate of Compliance, 2014 VT 125 (Vt. 2014). · cites it 3× “R 5(d)(2) (stating that appellant claiming party status under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1), which applies to zoning appeals, is “automatically accorded that status” when notice of appeal is filed, unless court dismisses party based on motion).”
In re Waterfront Park Act 250 Amendment (Alison Lockwood, Appellant), 2016 VT 39 (Vt. 2016). · cites it 2× “Neighbor appealed the amended land use permit to the Environmental Division pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8504. On appeal before the Environmental Division, the City and neighbor filed cross-motions for summary judgment on the threshold question of whether the City was entitled to…”
In re Route 103 Quarry, 2007 VT 66 (Vt. 2007). · cites it 3× “We need not parse the language of that rule regarding automatic stays because we conclude that 10 V.S.A. § 8504(f) controls and establishes discretionary stays in appeals not only to, but also from, the Environmental Court.”
In Re Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee Discharge Permit 3-1199, 2009 VT 124 (Vt. 2009). · cites it 2× “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(h). The rules promulgated for the Environmental Court also lay out the appropriate standard of review: In an appeal by trial de novo, all questions of law or fact as to which review is available shall be tried to the court, which shall apply the substantive…”
Show all 421 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(11) — 1 case
JLD Prop. St. Albans Wal Mart (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(2)(A) — 1 case
Lake Bomoseen Ass'n & LBPT Denial - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(B)(1) — 1 case
PCH, Inc. PCG, Inc Bldg. Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(B)(i) — 1 case
Lemelson WW Permit - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(B)(ii) — 1 case
Lemelson WW Permit - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(a) — 63 cases
In re Snowstone Stormwater Discharge Authorization (Michael Harrington, Appellants), 2021 VT 36 (Vt. 2021). “Snowstone moved to dismiss neighbors’ appeal and statement of questions, arguing that neighbors lacked standing under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(a) to raise the legal issues presented in questions 1-18, 22, 26, and 28 (all dealing with the ANR Authorization to proceed under a MSGP).”
In re Treetop Dev. Co. Act 250 Dev. (Treetop at Stratton Condo. Assn., Inc., Appellant), 2016 VT 20 (Vt. 2016). “10 V.S.A. § 8504(a). ¶ 12. In order to ensure continued compliance with the statutory criteria, the Commission is entitled to grant conditional approval by imposing reasonable conditions on a project.”
In re Mathez Act 250 LU Permit (Sung-Hee Chung, Appellant), 192 A.3d 400 (Vt. 2018). “On September 2, 2016, applicants appealed the second notice to the Environmental Division under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(a), which authorizes direct appeals of District Commission decisions to the Environmental Division.”
In Re DJK, LLC WW & WS Permit (Ralph Crowley & Joanne Crowley, Appellants), 2024 VT 34 (Vt. 2024). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(a). Questions about easements could fall outside of this jurisdiction, as they did in Britting, where the plaintiff requested what amounted to an advisory opinion about the legal duty to obtain an easement.”
In Re Lake Bomoseen Ass'n & Lake Bomoseen Pres. Trust Denial (Lindsey C. Waterhouse, Appellant), 2025 VT 59 (Vt. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(b) — 18 cases
In Re Guillemette ZA Determination Appeal (Anne Guillemette & Mark Guillemette, Appellants), 2025 VT 25 (Vt. 2025).
109-111 Shelburne St/97 Locust St CU - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019).
Goddard Coll. CU (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Highridge Plaza, LLC Amendment - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
Devonwood Investors, LLC 75 Cherry Street (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(b)(1) — 54 cases
In Re Verizon Wireless Barton Permit, 2010 VT 62 (Vt. 2010). “The court explained that neighbors could not claim party status under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1) because they did not participate in the proceedings before the municipal panel within the relevant time frame.”
In re Carrigan Conditional Use & Certificate of Compliance, Certificate of Occupancy, Certificate of Compliance, 2014 VT 125 (Vt. 2014). “R 5(d)(2) (stating that appellant claiming party status under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1), which applies to zoning appeals, is “automatically accorded that status” when notice of appeal is filed, unless court dismisses party based on motion).”
In re Mahar Conditional Use Permit (Mary Lahiff, Carolyn Hallock, Susan Harritt & William Butler, Appellants), 183 A.3d 1136 (Vt. 2018). “10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1) ("Within 30 days of the date of the act or decision, an interested person, as defined in 24 V.”
Jennifer Weinstein v. Jeanmarie Leonard & Carol Sayour v. Lloyd J. Weinstein & The Weinstein Grp., P.C., 2015 VT 75 (Vt. 2015).
In re Vermont Permanency Initiative, Inc. Denial (Concerned4Newbury, Inc., & Town of Newbury, Cross-Appellant), 2023 VT 65 (Vt. 2023).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(b)(2) — 17 cases
In Re Verizon Wireless Barton Permit, 2010 VT 62 (Vt. 2010). “The court explained that neighbors could not claim party status under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1) because they did not participate in the proceedings before the municipal panel within the relevant time frame.”
In re Mahar Conditional Use Permit (Mary Lahiff, Carolyn Hallock, Susan Harritt & William Butler, Appellants), 183 A.3d 1136 (Vt. 2018). “10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1) ("Within 30 days of the date of the act or decision, an interested person, as defined in 24 V.”
In re Appeal of MDY Taxes, Inc. & Vill. Car Wash, Inc., 2015 VT 65 (Vt. 2015). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1). Thus, participation in the municipal regulatory proceeding below is ordinarily required in order to have standing to appeal.”
In Re Guillemette ZA Determination Appeal (Anne Guillemette & Mark Guillemette, Appellants), 2025 VT 25 (Vt. 2025).
Mahar CU (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(b)(2)(A) — 10 cases
In Re Verizon Wireless Barton Permit, 2010 VT 62 (Vt. 2010). “The court explained that neighbors could not claim party status under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1) because they did not participate in the proceedings before the municipal panel within the relevant time frame.”
In re Appeal of MDY Taxes, Inc. & Vill. Car Wash, Inc., 2015 VT 65 (Vt. 2015). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1). Thus, participation in the municipal regulatory proceeding below is ordinarily required in order to have standing to appeal.”
982 Holiday Point Road Setback Waiver - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
Yummy Woodstock, LLC DRB Change of Use Appeal - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
Cummings Subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(b)(2)(B) — 2 cases
RACDC Retention Pond (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Cummings Subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(b)(2)(C) — 20 cases
In re Appeal of MDY Taxes, Inc. & Vill. Car Wash, Inc., 2015 VT 65 (Vt. 2015). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(b)(1). Thus, participation in the municipal regulatory proceeding below is ordinarily required in order to have standing to appeal.”
In Re Guillemette ZA Determination Appeal (Anne Guillemette & Mark Guillemette, Appellants), 2025 VT 25 (Vt. 2025).
982 Holiday Point Road Setback Waiver - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
Mad River Barn CU (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017).
Jolley Assoc Car Wash Middlebury (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(c) — 1 case
G.R. Enter., Inc. Sign Application (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(c)(1) — 5 cases
Three Church Street Act 250 Land Use Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007).
Bergmann Act 250 Subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008).
Sports Venue Found., Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007).
Hovey Act 250 Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014).
Sports Venue Found., Inc. Act 250 LU Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(c)(3) — 1 case
In Re Guillemette ZA Determination Appeal (Anne Guillemette & Mark Guillemette, Appellants), 2025 VT 25 (Vt. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d) — 10 cases
Tyler Bridge Road Permit Amendment Application - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
Scott Farm Act 250 - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018).
Ne. Materials Broup LLC Amended Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
Bennington Walmart (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Chaves Londonderry Gravel Pit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(1) — 21 cases
In re SP Land Co., LLC, Act 250 LUP Amendment, 2011 VT 104 (Vt. 2011). “They contend that Mountainside was granted party status only on the question of whether it should be joined as a co-applicant and point to the language of 10 V.S.A. § 8504(d)(1), which states that a person appealing an act or decision made by a district commission “may only…”
Verizon Wireless Act 250 Permit Barton (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
Bennington Walmart (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Tyler Bridge Road Permit Amendment Application - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
Orlandi Act 250 Kennel Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(1)(B) — 2 cases
Snyder Grp., Inc. Act 250 - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019).
Tyler Bridge Road Permit Amendment Application - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(2) — 13 cases
In Re Lake Bomoseen Ass'n & Lake Bomoseen Pres. Trust Denial (Lindsey C. Waterhouse, Appellant), 2025 VT 59 (Vt. 2025).
Union Bank Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Bennington Walmart (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Waitsfield Pub. Water Sys. Act 250 Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
Verizon Wireless Act 250 Permit Barton (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(2)(A) — 9 cases
Champlain Parkway SW Discharge Permit - Decision on Motion (Dismiss) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019).
Bellows Falls Hydroelectric Water Quality Cert. Appeal - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
Hydroelectric Proj. Water Quality Cert Appeal Cases - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
BlackRock Constr. LLC Act 250 - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019).
Tyler Bridge Road Permit Amendment Application - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(2)(A)(i) — 3 cases
Champlain Parkway SW Discharge Permit - Decision on Motion (Dismiss) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019).
Bellows Falls Hydroelectric Water Quality Cert. Appeal - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
Hydroelectric Proj. Water Quality Cert Appeal Cases - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(2)(A)(ii) — 2 cases
Bellows Falls Hydroelectric Water Quality Cert. Appeal - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
Hydroelectric Proj. Water Quality Cert Appeal Cases - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(2)(A)(iii) — 3 cases
Champlain Parkway SW Discharge Permit - Decision on Motion (Dismiss) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019).
Bellows Falls Hydroelectric Water Quality Cert. Appeal - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
Hydroelectric Proj. Water Quality Cert Appeal Cases - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(2)(B) — 16 cases
Ne. Materials Broup LLC Amended Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
Bennington Walmart (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Bennington Wal Mart (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Champlain Parkway Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Union Bank Act 250 Application (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(2)(B)(iv) — 1 case
Bellows Falls Hydroelectric Water Quality Cert. Appeal - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(2)(C) — 4 cases
Union Bank Act 250 Application (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
Granville Mfg Co., Inc. Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Laberge Shooting Range JO (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016).
Bergmann Act 250 Subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(d)(l) — 1 case
Granville Mfg Co., Inc. Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(f) — 15 cases
In re Route 103 Quarry, 2007 VT 66 (Vt. 2007). “We need not parse the language of that rule regarding automatic stays because we conclude that 10 V.S.A. § 8504(f) controls and establishes discretionary stays in appeals not only to, but also from, the Environmental Court.”
Devonwood Investors, LLC 75 Cherry Street (Motion to Stay) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017).
623 Roosevelt High. - Entry Regarding Motion to Enjoin (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018).
Lathrop Ltd. P'ship I (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014).
Beam Lot Line Adjustment Appeal - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2023).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(f)(1) — 6 cases
Waitasfield Water Supply (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012).
Sheffield Wind Proj. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
N. Comm. Inv. Corp. CU (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007).
Punderson 2-Lot Subdivision - Decision on Motion (Stay) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019).
Moretown Landfill Recertification (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(f)(1)(B) — 2 cases
Punderson 2-Lot Subdivision - Decision on Motion (Stay) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019).
RACDC Retention Pond (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(f)(2) — 8 cases
In re Route 103 Quarry, 2007 VT 66 (Vt. 2007). “We need not parse the language of that rule regarding automatic stays because we conclude that 10 V.S.A. § 8504(f) controls and establishes discretionary stays in appeals not only to, but also from, the Environmental Court.”
Moretown Landfill Recertification (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
Lathrop Ltd. P'ship I (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014).
Mahar CU (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016).
Hinesburg Hannaford SP Application - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(g) — 3 cases
R.L. Vallee, Inc. et a MS4 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017).
Duval CU Denial - Decision on Motion (Reopen) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2020).
Lathrop Ltr P'ship I (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(h) — 180 cases
Rhoades Salvage/ABC Metals v. Town of Milton Selectboard, 2010 VT 82 (Vt. 2010).
In Re DJK, LLC WW & WS Permit (Ralph Crowley & Joanne Crowley, Appellants), 2024 VT 34 (Vt. 2024). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(a). Questions about easements could fall outside of this jurisdiction, as they did in Britting, where the plaintiff requested what amounted to an advisory opinion about the legal duty to obtain an easement.”
In Re Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee Discharge Permit 3-1199, 2009 VT 124 (Vt. 2009). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(h). The rules promulgated for the Environmental Court also lay out the appropriate standard of review: In an appeal by trial de novo, all questions of law or fact as to which review is available shall be tried to the court, which shall apply the substantive…”
In Re Dousevicz, Inc. CU & Site Plan Approval (Kathleen Culpo, Appellants), 2025 VT 22 (Vt. 2025).
In Re Cote/Maquam Shore Mkt. (Janet Cote, Appellant), 2025 VT 42 (Vt. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(h)(1) — 2 cases
D&D Props. LLC CU (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016).
Tasha Tudor & Fam., Inc. CU Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(h)(3) — 1 case
In re Waterfront Park Act 250 Amendment (Alison Lockwood, Appellant), 2016 VT 39 (Vt. 2016). “Neighbor appealed the amended land use permit to the Environmental Division pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 8504. On appeal before the Environmental Division, the City and neighbor filed cross-motions for summary judgment on the threshold question of whether the City was entitled to…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(i) — 8 cases
In Re Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee Discharge Permit 3-1199, 2009 VT 124 (Vt. 2009). “” 10 V.S.A. § 8504(h). The rules promulgated for the Environmental Court also lay out the appropriate standard of review: In an appeal by trial de novo, all questions of law or fact as to which review is available shall be tried to the court, which shall apply the substantive…”
Harvey & West 65 Unit Campground Act 250 Application (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Unified Buddhist Chuch, Inc. Act 250 Permit Application (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008).
Woodstock Comm. Trust & Vermont Hous. PUD (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
CLF Stormwater Discharge (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(j) — 1 case
Ridgewood Est. HOA & Indian Creek HOA Ass'n (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(k)(3) — 1 case
Snyder Grp., Inc. Act 250 - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(l) — 1 case
Hinesburg Hannaford Act 250 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(m) — 54 cases
In re Application of Lathrop Ltd. P'ship I, II & III, 2015 VT 49 (Vt. 2015).
In re Route 103 Quarry, 2007 VT 66 (Vt. 2007). “We need not parse the language of that rule regarding automatic stays because we conclude that 10 V.S.A. § 8504(f) controls and establishes discretionary stays in appeals not only to, but also from, the Environmental Court.”
In Re Burchard Road Petition to Abandon Land Use Permit Denial (Myrna Nathin, Appellant), 2024 VT 51 (Vt. 2024).
In re Lathrop Ltd. P'ship I, 199 Vt. 19 (Vt. 2015).
Suburban Propane, LP A250 Denial - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(n) — 19 cases
In re Zaremba Grp. Act 250 Permit, 127 A.3d 93 (Vt. 2015).
Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit/Diverging Diamond Interchange A250/R.L. Vallee, Inc.et Al MS4 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017).
Lawrence Site Plan Approval (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Lawrence Site Plan Approval (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
53 North Pleasant Street Denial - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(n)(1) — 6 cases
Appeal of Rivers Dev., LLC (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007).
Ranney Dairy Farm, LLC Major Subdivision Appeal - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
Poultney Props. LLC Change of Use & SP App. - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021).
Devonwood Investors, LLC 75 Cherry Street (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017).
100 Terra Lane Zoning Permit Appeal - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(n)(2) — 9 cases
In re Snowstone Stormwater Discharge Authorization (Michael Harrington, Appellants), 2021 VT 36 (Vt. 2021). “Snowstone moved to dismiss neighbors’ appeal and statement of questions, arguing that neighbors lacked standing under 10 V.S.A. § 8504(a) to raise the legal issues presented in questions 1-18, 22, 26, and 28 (all dealing with the ANR Authorization to proceed under a MSGP).”
Zlotoff Found. Inc. NOV (2) - Decision on Motion (Intervene) (Vt. Super. Ct. 2020).
Champlain Oil Co McDuff 19-2-16 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016).
53 North Pleasant Street Denial - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
Snowstone LLC SW Discharge & Snowstone, LLC JO 2-308 - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2020).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(n)(3) — 6 cases
In Re Katzenbach A250 Permit 7R1374-1 (Christian Katzenbach & Clark Katzenbach, Appellants), 2022 VT 42 (Vt. 2022).
Diverging Diamond Interchange A250 - Decision on the Merits (Vt. Super. Ct. 2020).
Diverging Diamond Interchange A250 - Amended Decision on the Merits (Vt. Super. Ct. 2020).
Katzenbach A250 Permit 7R1374-1 - Decision on Merits (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021).
Entergy Nuclear/Vermont Yankee Thermal Discharge Permit Amendment (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(n)(4) — 5 cases
Lake Bomoseen Ass'n & LBPT Denial - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
Unified Buddhist Church, Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007).
Omya Solid Waste Facility Interim Certification (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Morgan Meadows/Black Dog Realty Subdivision Act 250 Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2008).
Unified Buddhist church, Inc. Indirect Discharge Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(n)(5) — 13 cases
Poultney Props. LLC Change of Use & SP App. - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021).
McCullough Crushing, Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2013).
Zaremba CU - Jericho (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014).
Lawrence Site Plan Approval (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Lawrence Site Plan Approval (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 8504(n)(6) — 9 cases
Poultney Props. LLC Change of Use & SP App. - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021).
Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit/Diverging Diamond Interchange A250/R.L. Vallee, Inc.et Al MS4 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2017).
DeSimone & Moisis Fam. Trust CU Application (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
Poultney Props. LLC Change of Use & SP App. - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021).
Cummings Subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.