Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 1200 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 013 : DRUNKEN DRIVING

(Cite as: 23 V.S.A. § 1200)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1991–2021 · leading case: Sandra Baird & Jared Carter, 2016 VT 6 (Vt. 2016).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Sandra Baird & Jared Carter, 2016 VT 6 (Vt. 2016). “2 The trespass ordinance references 23 V.S.A. § 1200(4) to define “intoxicating liquor” but does not expressly cross-reference Burlington Ordinance § 21-38.”
State v. Hanks, 772 A.2d 1087 (Vt. 2001). · cites it 2× “” See 23 V.S.A. § 1200(1)(A)-(B). Thus, the Legislature has effectively accepted a standard partition ratio of 2100:1 and permitted BrAC samples to stand independently.”
State v. Brooks, 643 A.2d 226 (Vt. 1993). “DataMaster’s trustworthiness as an “evidentiary test” under 23 V.S.A. § 1200(3) is still an open question, but, because the same issue may be determined under V.”
State v. Camolli, 591 A.2d 53 (Vt. 1991). “3 23 V.S.A. § 1200(3) provides as follows: As used in this subchapter, *213 (3) “Evidentiary test” means a breath or blood test which indicates the weight of alcohol in a person’s blood, as shown by analysis of the person’s breath or blood and which is intended to be introduced…”
State v. Charland, 2011 VT 107 (Vt. 2011). “See 23 V.S.A. § 1200(7) (defining “highway” to exclude driyeway serving single- or two-family residence of operator unless operator causes bodily injury or property damage).”
Ritchie v. State of Vermont (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021). “See 23 V.S.A. § 1200(2)(a) (defining “drug” to include regulated drugs listed at 18 V.”
Abrell v. Dep't of Motor Vehs. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). “23 V.S.A. § 1200(2) (defining “drug” to include regulated drugs under 18 V.”
State v. King, 624 A.2d 1144 (Vt. 1993). “” 23 V.S.A. § 1200(3) (emphasis added). *613 The fact that several sections of Title 23 specifically refer to infrared devices leaves no doubt that the Datamaster test was meant to measure blood-alcohol concentration and was intended to provide samples to be introduced in…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 1200(1)(A) — 1 case
State v. Hanks, 772 A.2d 1087 (Vt. 2001). “” See 23 V.S.A. § 1200(1)(A)-(B). Thus, the Legislature has effectively accepted a standard partition ratio of 2100:1 and permitted BrAC samples to stand independently.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 1200(2) — 1 case
Abrell v. Dep't of Motor Vehs. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2015). “23 V.S.A. § 1200(2) (defining “drug” to include regulated drugs under 18 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 1200(2)(a) — 1 case
Ritchie v. State of Vermont (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021). “See 23 V.S.A. § 1200(2)(a) (defining “drug” to include regulated drugs listed at 18 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 1200(3) — 4 cases
State v. Brooks, 643 A.2d 226 (Vt. 1993). “DataMaster’s trustworthiness as an “evidentiary test” under 23 V.S.A. § 1200(3) is still an open question, but, because the same issue may be determined under V.”
State v. Hanks, 772 A.2d 1087 (Vt. 2001). “” See 23 V.S.A. § 1200(1)(A)-(B). Thus, the Legislature has effectively accepted a standard partition ratio of 2100:1 and permitted BrAC samples to stand independently.”
State v. Camolli, 591 A.2d 53 (Vt. 1991). “3 23 V.S.A. § 1200(3) provides as follows: As used in this subchapter, *213 (3) “Evidentiary test” means a breath or blood test which indicates the weight of alcohol in a person’s blood, as shown by analysis of the person’s breath or blood and which is intended to be introduced…”
State v. King, 624 A.2d 1144 (Vt. 1993). “” 23 V.S.A. § 1200(3) (emphasis added). *613 The fact that several sections of Title 23 specifically refer to infrared devices leaves no doubt that the Datamaster test was meant to measure blood-alcohol concentration and was intended to provide samples to be introduced in…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 1200(4) — 1 case
Sandra Baird & Jared Carter, 2016 VT 6 (Vt. 2016). “2 The trespass ordinance references 23 V.S.A. § 1200(4) to define “intoxicating liquor” but does not expressly cross-reference Burlington Ordinance § 21-38.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 1200(7) — 1 case
State v. Charland, 2011 VT 107 (Vt. 2011). “See 23 V.S.A. § 1200(7) (defining “highway” to exclude driyeway serving single- or two-family residence of operator unless operator causes bodily injury or property damage).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.