Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 24 Chapter 117
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4418 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 007 : BYLAWS

(Cite as: 24 V.S.A. § 4418)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 19 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2005–2022 · leading case: In re Appeal of Carroll, 925 A.2d 990 (Vt. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In re Appeal of Carroll, 925 A.2d 990 (Vt. 2007). “Thus, 24 V.S.A. § 4418 provides: Subdivision bylaws.”
David Demarest v. Town of Underhill, 2021 VT 14 (Vt. 2021). “, 24 V.S.A. § 4418 (giving municipalities authority to establish 14 subdivision bylaws).”
In Re Appeal of Van Nostrand, 2008 VT 77 (Vt. 2008). “2 This section has since been repealed and replaced by 24 V.S.A. § 4418(1)(B), which contains similar standards and requirements.”
LaFogg Subdivision final Plat (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). · cites it 3× “We 3 Appellant also contends that the Regulations do not contain any of the subdivision standards found in 24 V.SA. § 4418 entitled ”Subdivision bylaws.”
Capitol Plaza 2-Lot Subdivision/Capitol Plaza Major Site Plan - Decision on Motions (Vt. Super. Ct. 2020). “§ 4410 (municipalities “may regulate land development”); 24 V.S.A. § 4418 (municipalities “may regulate [subdivision]”).”
Benson Road Site Plan & Condition Use - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2021). “Our decision in In re Carrigan did not address the constitutional validity of the challenged waiver provisions, although Applicant is correct that we found that the waiver provisions at issue there did satisfy the statutory requirements then contained at 24 VSA § 4418, making…”
Rock Pile Props., LLC CU Permit - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2022). “The Town had adopted a multi-stage procedure for major subdivision review, as authorized by 24 V.S.A. § 4418(2)(B). That procedure required the developer to submit a preliminary plat and the DRB to hold a public hearing on that plat.”
Waitasfield Water Supply (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). “Additionally, our Supreme Court has indicated that even where a municipality elects to have a multi-staged review process for proposed subdivisions, as is authorized by 24 V.S.A. § 4418, “subdivision review [should be considered as] one proceeding from application to preliminary…”
Bibby 5-Lot Final Plat subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). “We do not find anything in these provisions that would require the DRB to review and approve the construction of proposed improvements See also 24 V.S.A. § 4418(1)(8). Rather, we understand the`DRB's review of a final plat to require the review and approval of the designation of…”
Cummings Subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011). “383 (describing the various stages of subdivision approval); 24 V.S.A. § 4418(2)(B) (authorizing municipal ordinances to provide for preliminary stages of subdivision review).”
Kelsey Notice of Violation (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011). “§§ 130(B), 340(A); and see 24 V.S.A. § 4418. Assuming that Lot A did not merge with Appellant’s large parcel in 1996, see note 1, above, Appellant could have conveyed Lot A alone, without creating a subdivision .”
SP Land Co., LLC Golf Course PUD (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011). “” Although there is no explicit authorization in Title 24 for municipalities to incorporate a preliminary review process for PUDs, as there is for subdivision review under 24 V.S.A. § 4418(2)(B), the grant of authority evidenced by the language of § 4410 and § 4417 is broad…”
Show all 19 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4418(1) — 1 case
LaFogg Subdivision final Plat (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). “We 3 Appellant also contends that the Regulations do not contain any of the subdivision standards found in 24 V.SA. § 4418 entitled ”Subdivision bylaws.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4418(1)(8) — 1 case
Bibby 5-Lot Final Plat subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). “We do not find anything in these provisions that would require the DRB to review and approve the construction of proposed improvements See also 24 V.S.A. § 4418(1)(8). Rather, we understand the`DRB's review of a final plat to require the review and approval of the designation of…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4418(1)(B) — 2 cases
In Re Appeal of Van Nostrand, 2008 VT 77 (Vt. 2008). “2 This section has since been repealed and replaced by 24 V.S.A. § 4418(1)(B), which contains similar standards and requirements.”
Appeal of McLaughlin (Vt. Super. Ct. 2006).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4418(1)(C) — 1 case
Highland Dev. Co., LLC & JAM Golf, LLC Master Plan (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4418(2)(A) — 1 case
White Major Subdivision Application (Vt. Super. Ct. 2009).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4418(2)(B) — 3 cases
Rock Pile Props., LLC CU Permit - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2022). “The Town had adopted a multi-stage procedure for major subdivision review, as authorized by 24 V.S.A. § 4418(2)(B). That procedure required the developer to submit a preliminary plat and the DRB to hold a public hearing on that plat.”
Cummings Subdivision (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011). “383 (describing the various stages of subdivision approval); 24 V.S.A. § 4418(2)(B) (authorizing municipal ordinances to provide for preliminary stages of subdivision review).”
SP Land Co., LLC Golf Course PUD (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011). “” Although there is no explicit authorization in Title 24 for municipalities to incorporate a preliminary review process for PUDs, as there is for subdivision review under 24 V.S.A. § 4418(2)(B), the grant of authority evidenced by the language of § 4410 and § 4417 is broad…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 24, § 4418(8) — 1 case
Carrigan Waiver & Variance Applications (Vt. Super. Ct. 2011).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.