Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086 (2026)

Issuance of permit; conditions and criteria.

✓ laws through the 2026 session (checked Sept. 2026)
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 004 : PERMITS

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 6086)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 292 cases (18 in the last 5 years), 1973–2026 · leading case: In re Korrow Real Est., LLC Act 250 Permit Amendment Application (State of Vermont, Appellant), 2018 VT 39, 187 A.3d 1125.
In re Korrow Real Est., LLC Act 250 Permit Amendment Application (State of Vermont, Appellant), 2018 VT 39, 187 A.3d 1125. · cites it 14× “On appeal, we address two issues: (1) whether the Korrow project complies with Act 250 Criterion 1(D), pertaining to the project's impact on the "floodway" and the "floodway fringe"; and (2) whether the project complies with Criterion 1(F), pertaining to development on a…”
In re Vill. Assocs. Act 250 Land Use Permit, 998 A.2d 712 (Vt. 2010). · cites it 12× “In 2006, the Legislature also amended 10 V.S.A. § 6086 to allow development when it "will not result in any reduction in the agricultural potential of the primary agricultural soils," compared to the previous wording of § 6086 which disallowed development if the agricultural…”
In re Wildlife Wonderland, Inc., 346 A.2d 645 (Vt. 1975). · cites it 30× “The applicant Wildlife, owner of six hundred and twenty-seven acres in the towns of Mount Holly and Weston, sought and was granted a permit by the District Environmental Commission, which found in its favor upon criteria (1) through (10) of 10 V.S.A. § 6086, as amended. The…”
In re Eastview at Middlebury, Inc., 2009 VT 98, 992 A.2d 1014. · cites it 8× “Criterion 8 mandates that, before the court may sanction the grant of an Act 250 permit, it must conclude that the development “[w]ill not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic or natural beauty of the area, aesthetics, historic sites or rare and irreplaceable natural areas.”
In re SP Land Co., LLC, Act 250 LUP Amendment, 2011 VT 104, 35 A.3d 1007. · cites it 8× “Even Act 250 Rule 21, which sets forth the procedure for review of projects under specified criteria or subcriteria, distinguishes between partial findings of fact and conclusions of law and “permit.” Pursuant to this rule, a district commission may issue partial findings of…”
In re Appeal of Times & Seasons, LLC, 2008 VT 7, 950 A.2d 1189. · cites it 7× “” 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(10). The Board found that the project did not comply with the following provision in the town plan: “Where feasible, commercial development shall be located within or close to South Royalton Village or Royalton Village, re-using existing sites where…”
In re Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit, Diverging Diamond Interchange A250 (R.L. Vallee, Inc. & Timberlake Assocs., LLP, Appellants), 2019 VT 57, 218 A.3d 564. · cites it 7× “” 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(1). Criterion 1 also has seven subcriteria.”
In re Costco Stormwater Dishcharge Permit, Costco Final Plat & Site Plan, Costco Act 250 Land Use Permit, Wetlands, Reclassification (R.L. Vallee, Inc. & Timberlake Assocs. LLP, Appellants), 2016 VT 86, 151 A.3d 320. · cites it 5× “See 10 V.S.A. §§ 6086(a)(1) (requiring that development “[w]ill not result *581 in undue water .”
In re Agency of Admin., Etc., 444 A.2d 1349 (Vt. 1982). · cites it 7× “10 V.S.A. § 6086. It seems a matter of elementary logic that in order for this extensive permit process to have any meaning whatsoever, the “plan” which triggers it must be sufficiently firm and detailed to give the notice it contemplates and which is constitutionally required,…”
In re B&M Realty, LLC, 2016 VT 114, 158 A.3d 754. · cites it 5× “” 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(10). Regional planning commissions must assist district environmental commissions in assessing whether a project complies with a regional plan.”
In re Pyramid Co. of Burlington, 449 A.2d 915 (Vt. 1982). · cites it 7× “See 10 V.S.A. § 6086. Even if this Court answered each of the certified questions in the appellant’s favor, a complex trial involving numerous issues would still be necessary to resolve this case.”
In re Hawk Mountain Corp., 542 A.2d 261 (Vt. 1988). · cites it 12× “The Board found that the proposed development did not meet Water Resources Department regulations, and thus criterion one of 10 V.S.A. § 6086 had not been met. Appellants’ proposed complex of leach fields was found by the Board to discharge domestic wastes containing pathogenic…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(1): 4 cases
N.E. Materials Gp., No. 35-3-13 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 18, 2016).
Hinesburg Hannaford Act 250, No. 113-8-14 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 12, 2016).
N.E. Materials Grp Act 250, No. 35-3-13 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 11, 2016).
NE Materials Grp, LLC A250 - Decision on the Merits, No. 75-6-17 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. June 20, 2018).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(1)(E): 1 case
Killington Resort Parking Proj. A250 Amendment, No. 173-12-13 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 7, 2016).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(3)(9)(13): 1 case
JLD Prop. St. Albans Wal Mart, No. 116-6-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 20, 2010).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(8): 1 case
Margaret Pratt Assisted Living, No. 111-8-14 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. June 21, 2016).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(8)(A): 1 case
In re Killington, Ltd., 616 A.2d 241 (Vt. 1992).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(9)(E): 1 case
Sprague Farms, LLC, No. 107-6-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 13, 2009).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(A)(10): 1 case
Eastview at Middlebury, Inc. Act 250 Permit 9A0314, No. 256-11-06 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Feb. 15, 2008).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a): 73 cases
In re SP Land Co., LLC, Act 250 LUP Amendment, 2011 VT 104, 35 A.3d 1007. “Even Act 250 Rule 21, which sets forth the procedure for review of projects under specified criteria or subcriteria, distinguishes between partial findings of fact and conclusions of law and “permit.” Pursuant to this rule, a district commission may issue partial findings of…”
In re Wildlife Wonderland, Inc., 346 A.2d 645 (Vt. 1975). “The applicant Wildlife, owner of six hundred and twenty-seven acres in the towns of Mount Holly and Weston, sought and was granted a permit by the District Environmental Commission, which found in its favor upon criteria (1) through (10) of 10 V.S.A. § 6086, as amended. The…”
In re Pyramid Co. of Burlington, 449 A.2d 915 (Vt. 1982). “See 10 V.S.A. § 6086. Even if this Court answered each of the certified questions in the appellant’s favor, a complex trial involving numerous issues would still be necessary to resolve this case.”
Gade v. Chittenden Solid Waste Dist., 2009 VT 107, 989 A.2d 491.
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(1): 67 cases
In re Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit, Diverging Diamond Interchange A250 (R.L. Vallee, Inc. & Timberlake Assocs., LLP, Appellants), 2019 VT 57, 218 A.3d 564. “” 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(1). Criterion 1 also has seven subcriteria.”
In re Hawk Mountain Corp., 542 A.2d 261 (Vt. 1988). “The Board found that the proposed development did not meet Water Resources Department regulations, and thus criterion one of 10 V.S.A. § 6086 had not been met. Appellants’ proposed complex of leach fields was found by the Board to discharge domestic wastes containing pathogenic…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(1)(4): 1 case
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(1)(A): 2 cases
Katzenbach Act 250 Permit - Entry Regarding Motion for Party Status, No. 124-9-17 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 14, 2018).
Costco SW Discharge Permit, No. 75-6-12 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 27, 2015).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(1)(A)(B): 1 case
Unified Buddhist Chuch, Inc. Act 250 Permit Application, No. 191-09-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 2, 2008).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(1)(B): 22 cases
In re Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit, Diverging Diamond Interchange A250 (R.L. Vallee, Inc. & Timberlake Assocs., LLP, Appellants), 2019 VT 57, 218 A.3d 564. “” 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(1). Criterion 1 also has seven subcriteria.”
In re Route 103 Quarry, 2008 VT 88, 958 A.2d 694.
In re Hawk Mountain Corp., 542 A.2d 261 (Vt. 1988). “The Board found that the proposed development did not meet Water Resources Department regulations, and thus criterion one of 10 V.S.A. § 6086 had not been met. Appellants’ proposed complex of leach fields was found by the Board to discharge domestic wastes containing pathogenic…”
In re Chittenden Recycling Servs., 643 A.2d 1204 (Vt. 1994).
In re Zoning Permit Application of Clyde, 437 A.2d 121 (Vt. 1981).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(1)(D): 9 cases
In re Korrow Real Est., LLC Act 250 Permit Amendment Application (State of Vermont, Appellant), 2018 VT 39, 187 A.3d 1125. “On appeal, we address two issues: (1) whether the Korrow project complies with Act 250 Criterion 1(D), pertaining to the project's impact on the "floodway" and the "floodway fringe"; and (2) whether the project complies with Criterion 1(F), pertaining to development on a…”
In re Woodford Packers, Inc., 2003 VT 60, 830 A.2d 100.
In re Petition of VTel Wireless Inc., 2015 VT 135, 134 A.3d 1227.
Korrow Real Est. LLC Act 250, No. 29-3-16 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 23, 2017).
Union Bank Act 250 Application, No. 7-1-12 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 1, 2013).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(1)(D)(i): 3 cases
In re Korrow Real Est., LLC Act 250 Permit Amendment Application (State of Vermont, Appellant), 2018 VT 39, 187 A.3d 1125. “On appeal, we address two issues: (1) whether the Korrow project complies with Act 250 Criterion 1(D), pertaining to the project's impact on the "floodway" and the "floodway fringe"; and (2) whether the project complies with Criterion 1(F), pertaining to development on a…”
Korrow Real Est. LLC Act 250, No. 29-3-16 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 23, 2017).
Katzenbach A250 Permit 7R1374-1 - Decision on Merits, No. 79-7-19 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 16, 2021).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(1)(D)(ii): 1 case
In re Zaremba Grp. Act 250 Permit, 199 Vt. 538 (2015).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(1)(E): 12 cases
Killington Resort Parking Proj. A250 Amendment, No. 173-12-13 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 7, 2016).
Katzenbach A250 Permit 7R1374-1 - Decision on Merits, No. 79-7-19 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 16, 2021).
Killington Vill. Master Plan Act 250, No. 147-10-13 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. June 21, 2016).
Woodstock Comm. Trust & Vermont Hous. PUD, No. 203-10-09 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 14, 2011).
Hinesburg Hannaford Act 250, No. 113-8-14 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 12, 2016).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(1)(F): 7 cases
In re Korrow Real Est., LLC Act 250 Permit Amendment Application (State of Vermont, Appellant), 2018 VT 39, 187 A.3d 1125. “On appeal, we address two issues: (1) whether the Korrow project complies with Act 250 Criterion 1(D), pertaining to the project's impact on the "floodway" and the "floodway fringe"; and (2) whether the project complies with Criterion 1(F), pertaining to development on a…”
In re Woodford Packers, Inc., 2003 VT 60, 830 A.2d 100.
In re McShinsky, 572 A.2d 916 (Vt. 1990).
Putney Rowing Club, Inc. Land Use Permit Application - Merits Decision, No. 25-ENV-00073 (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 21, 2025).
Korrow Real Est. LLC Act 250, No. 29-3-16 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 23, 2017).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(1)(F)(i): 1 case
In re Korrow Real Est., LLC Act 250 Permit Amendment Application (State of Vermont, Appellant), 2018 VT 39, 187 A.3d 1125. “On appeal, we address two issues: (1) whether the Korrow project complies with Act 250 Criterion 1(D), pertaining to the project's impact on the "floodway" and the "floodway fringe"; and (2) whether the project complies with Criterion 1(F), pertaining to development on a…”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(1)(G): 4 cases
Woodstock Comm. Trust & Vermont Hous. PUD, No. 203-10-09 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 14, 2011).
Killington Vill. Master Plan Act 250, No. 147-10-13 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. June 21, 2016).
Rivers Dev., LLC Conditional Use, No. 7-1-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 25, 2010).
Route 103 Quarry, No. 205-10-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 22, 2006).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(10): 57 cases
In re B&M Realty, LLC, 2016 VT 114, 158 A.3d 754. “” 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(10). Regional planning commissions must assist district environmental commissions in assessing whether a project complies with a regional plan.”
In re John A. Russell Corp., 2003 VT 93, 838 A.2d 906.
In re Appeal of Times & Seasons, LLC, 2008 VT 7, 950 A.2d 1189. “” 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(10). The Board found that the project did not comply with the following provision in the town plan: “Where feasible, commercial development shall be located within or close to South Royalton Village or Royalton Village, re-using existing sites where…”
In re Molgano, 653 A.2d 772 (Vt. 1994).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(2): 4 cases
Killington Vill. Master Plan Act 250, No. 147-10-13 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. June 21, 2016).
Barefoot & Zweig Act 250, No. 46-4-12 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 14, 2013).
Rivers Dev., LLC Conditional Use, No. 7-1-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 25, 2010).
Route 103 Quarry, No. 205-10-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 22, 2006).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(3): 9 cases
Waitsfield Act 250 Water Supply, No. 33-2-10 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. July 11, 2012).
Harvey & West 65 Unit Campground Act 250 Application, No. 110-7-10 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 9, 2011).
Kevin L. Rogers, Inc., No. 88-5-09 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 4, 2009).
Killington Vill. Master Plan Act 250, No. 147-10-13 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. June 21, 2016).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(4): 16 cases
In re Agency of Admin., Etc., 444 A.2d 1349 (Vt. 1982). “10 V.S.A. § 6086. It seems a matter of elementary logic that in order for this extensive permit process to have any meaning whatsoever, the “plan” which triggers it must be sufficiently firm and detailed to give the notice it contemplates and which is constitutionally required,…”
In re Woodford Packers, Inc., 2003 VT 60, 830 A.2d 100.
In re Wildlife Wonderland, Inc., 346 A.2d 645 (Vt. 1975). “The applicant Wildlife, owner of six hundred and twenty-seven acres in the towns of Mount Holly and Weston, sought and was granted a permit by the District Environmental Commission, which found in its favor upon criteria (1) through (10) of 10 V.S.A. § 6086, as amended. The…”
In re Hamm Mine Act 250 Jurisdiction, 2009 VT 88, 980 A.2d 286.
Katzenbach A250 Permit 7R1374-1 - Decision on Merits, No. 79-7-19 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 16, 2021).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(5): 47 cases
In re Pilgrim P'ship, 572 A.2d 909 (Vt. 1990).
In re Chaves A250 Permit Reconsider, 2014 VT 5, 93 A.3d 69.
In re Pyramid Co. of Burlington, 449 A.2d 915 (Vt. 1982). “See 10 V.S.A. § 6086. Even if this Court answered each of the certified questions in the appellant’s favor, a complex trial involving numerous issues would still be necessary to resolve this case.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(5)(A): 7 cases
In re Costco Stormwater Dishcharge Permit, Costco Final Plat & Site Plan, Costco Act 250 Land Use Permit, Wetlands, Reclassification (R.L. Vallee, Inc. & Timberlake Assocs. LLP, Appellants), 2016 VT 86, 151 A.3d 320. “See 10 V.S.A. §§ 6086(a)(1) (requiring that development “[w]ill not result *581 in undue water .”
Katzenbach A250 Permit 7R1374-1 - Decision on Merits, No. 79-7-19 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 16, 2021).
Shires Hous. PUD Amendment/Shires Hous. Inc. Act 250, No. 171-12-14 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 14, 2017).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(5)(B): 2 cases
In re Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit, Diverging Diamond Interchange A250 (R.L. Vallee, Inc. & Timberlake Assocs., LLP, Appellants), 2019 VT 57, 218 A.3d 564. “” 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(1). Criterion 1 also has seven subcriteria.”
Katzenbach A250 Permit 7R1374-1 - Decision on Merits, No. 79-7-19 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 16, 2021).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(6): 5 cases
Shires Hous. PUD Amendment/Shires Hous. Inc. Act 250, No. 171-12-14 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 14, 2017).
Rivers Dev., LLC Conditional Use, No. 7-1-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 25, 2010).
Rivers Dev., LLC., No. 7-01-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 8, 2008).
In re Wal Mart Stores, Inc., 702 A.2d 397 (Vt. 1997).
JLD Prop. St. Albans Wal Mart, No. 116-6-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 20, 2010).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(7): 7 cases
In re Pyramid Co. of Burlington, 449 A.2d 915 (Vt. 1982). “See 10 V.S.A. § 6086. Even if this Court answered each of the certified questions in the appellant’s favor, a complex trial involving numerous issues would still be necessary to resolve this case.”
Killington Vill. Master Plan Act 250, No. 147-10-13 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. June 21, 2016).
Hinesburg Hannaford Act 250, No. 113-8-14 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 12, 2016).
Agri Mark, Inc. Act 250, No. 122-8-14 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. May 20, 2015).
Union Bank Act 250 Application, No. 7-1-12 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 1, 2013).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(8): 81 cases
In re Denio, 608 A.2d 1166 (Vt. 1992).
In re White, 779 A.2d 1264 (Vt. 2001).
In re Rinkers, Inc., 2011 VT 78, 27 A.3d 334.
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(8)(A): 14 cases
In re Killington, Ltd., 616 A.2d 241 (Vt. 1992).
Southview Assocs., Ltd. v. Bongartz, 980 F.2d 84 (2d Cir. 1992).
R-GOSHEN LLC v. Vill. of Goshen, 289 F. Supp. 2d 441 (S.D.N.Y. 2003).
In re Southview Assocs., 569 A.2d 501 (Vt. 1989).
Killington, Ltd. v. State, 668 A.2d 1278 (Vt. 1995).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(8)(A)(i): 3 cases
In re Killington, Ltd., 616 A.2d 241 (Vt. 1992).
Southview Assocs., Ltd. v. Bongartz, 980 F.2d 84 (2d Cir. 1992).
Rivers Dev., LLC Conditional Use, No. 7-1-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 25, 2010).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(8)(A)(iii): 3 cases
Verizon Wireless Barton Act 250 Permit, No. 6-1-09 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 29, 2010).
Fontaine Act 250 Application, No. 12-1-10 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Dec. 20, 2011).
Rinker's, Inc. dba Rinkers Commc'ns & Shepard Act 250 LU Permit, No. 302-12-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. May 17, 2010).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(9): 3 cases
In re Wildlife Wonderland, Inc., 346 A.2d 645 (Vt. 1975). “The applicant Wildlife, owner of six hundred and twenty-seven acres in the towns of Mount Holly and Weston, sought and was granted a permit by the District Environmental Commission, which found in its favor upon criteria (1) through (10) of 10 V.S.A. § 6086, as amended. The…”
In re Ross, 557 A.2d 490 (Vt. 1989).
Granville Mfg Co., Inc. Act 250, No. 2-1-11 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. July 1, 2011).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(9)(A): 6 cases
In re JLD Props. of St. Albans, LLC, 2011 VT 87, 30 A.3d 641.
In re Wal Mart Stores, Inc., 702 A.2d 397 (Vt. 1997).
Shires Hous. PUD Amendment/Shires Hous. Inc. Act 250, No. 171-12-14 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 14, 2017).
Champlain Parkway Act 250, No. 68-5-12 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 14, 2012).
JLD Prop. St. Albans Wal Mart, No. 116-6-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 20, 2010).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(9)(B): 23 cases
In re Vill. Assocs. Act 250 Land Use Permit, 998 A.2d 712 (Vt. 2010). “In 2006, the Legislature also amended 10 V.S.A. § 6086 to allow development when it "will not result in any reduction in the agricultural potential of the primary agricultural soils," compared to the previous wording of § 6086 which disallowed development if the agricultural…”
In re Appeal of Times & Seasons, LLC, 2008 VT 7, 950 A.2d 1189. “” 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(10). The Board found that the project did not comply with the following provision in the town plan: “Where feasible, commercial development shall be located within or close to South Royalton Village or Royalton Village, re-using existing sites where…”
In re Eastview at Middlebury, Inc., 2009 VT 98, 992 A.2d 1014. “Criterion 8 mandates that, before the court may sanction the grant of an Act 250 permit, it must conclude that the development “[w]ill not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic or natural beauty of the area, aesthetics, historic sites or rare and irreplaceable natural areas.”
In re Times & Seasons, LLC, 2011 VT 76, 27 A.3d 323.
Agency of Nat. Resources v. Weston, 2003 VT 58, 830 A.2d 92.
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(9)(B)(i): 8 cases
In re Appeal of Times & Seasons, LLC, 2008 VT 7, 950 A.2d 1189. “” 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(10). The Board found that the project did not comply with the following provision in the town plan: “Where feasible, commercial development shall be located within or close to South Royalton Village or Royalton Village, re-using existing sites where…”
In re Eastview at Middlebury, Inc., 2009 VT 98, 992 A.2d 1014. “Criterion 8 mandates that, before the court may sanction the grant of an Act 250 permit, it must conclude that the development “[w]ill not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic or natural beauty of the area, aesthetics, historic sites or rare and irreplaceable natural areas.”
In re Times & Seasons, LLC, 2011 VT 76, 27 A.3d 323.
In re Eastview at Middlebury, Inc., No. 2008-166 (Vt. Oct. 1, 2009).
Katzenbach Act 250 Permit - Entry Regarding Motion for Party Status, No. 124-9-17 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 14, 2018).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(9)(B)(iii): 4 cases
In re Eastview at Middlebury, Inc., 2009 VT 98, 992 A.2d 1014. “Criterion 8 mandates that, before the court may sanction the grant of an Act 250 permit, it must conclude that the development “[w]ill not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic or natural beauty of the area, aesthetics, historic sites or rare and irreplaceable natural areas.”
In re Eastview at Middlebury, Inc., No. 2008-166 (Vt. Oct. 1, 2009).
Brousseau/Wedgewood Act 250 PRD, No. 260-11-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. June 9, 2009).
Eastview at Middlebury, Inc., No. 256-11-06 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 23, 2008).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(9)(B)(iv): 6 cases
In re Vill. Assocs. Act 250 Land Use Permit, 998 A.2d 712 (Vt. 2010). “In 2006, the Legislature also amended 10 V.S.A. § 6086 to allow development when it "will not result in any reduction in the agricultural potential of the primary agricultural soils," compared to the previous wording of § 6086 which disallowed development if the agricultural…”
In re Eastview at Middlebury, Inc., 2009 VT 98, 992 A.2d 1014. “Criterion 8 mandates that, before the court may sanction the grant of an Act 250 permit, it must conclude that the development “[w]ill not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic or natural beauty of the area, aesthetics, historic sites or rare and irreplaceable natural areas.”
JLD Prop. St. Albans Wal Mart, No. 116-6-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 20, 2010).
In re Eastview at Middlebury, Inc., No. 2008-166 (Vt. Oct. 1, 2009).
Vill. Assocs. Act 250 LU Permit, No. 6-1-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 6, 2011).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(9)(D): 2 cases
Killington Vill. Master Plan Act 250, No. 147-10-13 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. June 21, 2016).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(9)(E): 8 cases
In re Route 103 Quarry, 2008 VT 88, 958 A.2d 694.
In re Munson Earth Moving Corp., 737 A.2d 906 (Vt. 1999).
Chaves Londonderry Gravel Pit LLC JO, No. 267-11-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 17, 2013).
Lathrop Ltd P'ship, No. 122-7-04 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 17, 2014).
McCullough Crusing, Inc. Act 250, No. 3-1-10 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. June 24, 2016).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(9)(E)(i): 4 cases
Route 103 Quarry, No. 205-10-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 22, 2006).
Rivers Dev., LLC Conditional Use Appeal, No. 7-1-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 17, 2010).
Pion Sand & Gravel Pit, No. 245-12-09 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. July 2, 2010).
Rivers Dev., LLC Conditional Use, No. 7-1-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 25, 2010).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(9)(E)(ii): 6 cases
In re Huntley, 2004 VT 115, 865 A.2d 1123.
Julian Materials, LLC JO - Decision on Motions, No. 23-ENV-00043 (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 21, 2024).
Rivers Dev., LLC Conditional Use, No. 7-1-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 25, 2010).
McCullough Crusing, Inc. Act 250, No. 3-1-10 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. June 24, 2016).
Pion Sand & Gravel Pit, No. 245-12-09 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. July 2, 2010).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(9)(G): 1 case
Big Spruce Road Act 250 Subdivision, No. 95-5-09 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 21, 2010).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(9)(H): 3 cases
Bennington Walmart, No. 158-10-11 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Apr. 24, 2012).
Rivers Dev., LLC Conditional Use, No. 7-1-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 25, 2010).
JLD Prop. St. Albans Wal Mart, No. 116-6-08 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Jan. 20, 2010).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(9)(J): 1 case
Rivers Dev., LLC Conditional Use, No. 7-1-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Mar. 25, 2010).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(9)(K): 24 cases
In re Hinesburg Hannaford Act 250 Permit, 179 A.3d 727 (Vt. 2017).
In re Munson Earth Moving Corp., 737 A.2d 906 (Vt. 1999).
In re Wildlife Wonderland, Inc., 346 A.2d 645 (Vt. 1975). “The applicant Wildlife, owner of six hundred and twenty-seven acres in the towns of Mount Holly and Weston, sought and was granted a permit by the District Environmental Commission, which found in its favor upon criteria (1) through (10) of 10 V.S.A. § 6086, as amended. The…”
Killington Resort Parking Proj. A250, No. 173-12-13 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Aug. 5, 2014).
Lathrop Ltr P'ship I, No. 122-7-04 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. Oct. 18, 2013).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(9)(L): 1 case
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(9)(L)(i): 2 cases
SM Farms Shop, LLC Permit Appeal - Decision on Motions, No. 23-ENV-00117 (Vt. Super. Ct. July 9, 2024).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(9)(L)(ii): 1 case
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(l): 5 cases
In re Eastview at Middlebury, Inc., 2009 VT 98, 992 A.2d 1014. “Criterion 8 mandates that, before the court may sanction the grant of an Act 250 permit, it must conclude that the development “[w]ill not have an undue adverse effect on the scenic or natural beauty of the area, aesthetics, historic sites or rare and irreplaceable natural areas.”
Jipac, NV v. Silas, 800 A.2d 1092 (Vt. 2002).
Sec'y v. Earth Constr., Inc., 676 A.2d 769 (Vt. 1996).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(l)(D)(ii): 1 case
In re Zaremba Grp. Act 250 Permit, 2015 VT 88, 127 A.3d 93.
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(a)(l0): 1 case
Rivers Dev., LLC, No. 7-01-05 Vtec (Vt. Super. Ct. July 1, 2008).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(b): 8 cases
In re Ross, 557 A.2d 490 (Vt. 1989).
In re Spencer, 566 A.2d 959 (Vt. 1989).
In re Wildlife Wonderland, Inc., 346 A.2d 645 (Vt. 1975). “The applicant Wildlife, owner of six hundred and twenty-seven acres in the towns of Mount Holly and Weston, sought and was granted a permit by the District Environmental Commission, which found in its favor upon criteria (1) through (10) of 10 V.S.A. § 6086, as amended. The…”
In re Sherman Hollow, Inc., 641 A.2d 753 (Vt. 1993).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(c): 25 cases
In re Quechee Lakes Corp., 580 A.2d 957 (Vt. 1990).
In re Stokes Commc'ns Corp., 664 A.2d 712 (Vt. 1995).
In re Chaves A250 Permit Reconsider, 2014 VT 5, 93 A.3d 69.
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(d): 20 cases
In re Costco Stormwater Dishcharge Permit, Costco Final Plat & Site Plan, Costco Act 250 Land Use Permit, Wetlands, Reclassification (R.L. Vallee, Inc. & Timberlake Assocs. LLP, Appellants), 2016 VT 86, 151 A.3d 320. “See 10 V.S.A. §§ 6086(a)(1) (requiring that development “[w]ill not result *581 in undue water .”
In re Hawk Mountain Corp., 542 A.2d 261 (Vt. 1988). “The Board found that the proposed development did not meet Water Resources Department regulations, and thus criterion one of 10 V.S.A. § 6086 had not been met. Appellants’ proposed complex of leach fields was found by the Board to discharge domestic wastes containing pathogenic…”
In re Diverging Diamond Interchange SW Permit, Diverging Diamond Interchange A250 (R.L. Vallee, Inc. & Timberlake Assocs., LLP, Appellants), 2019 VT 57, 218 A.3d 564. “” 10 V.S.A. § 6086(a)(1). Criterion 1 also has seven subcriteria.”
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(e): 1 case
In re Wildcat Constr. Co., 648 A.2d 827 (Vt. 1993).
Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6086(f): 1 case
In re Route 103 Quarry, 2007 VT 66, 933 A.2d 189.
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.