Wisconsin Statutes
Wis. Stat. § 948.085 (2026)
Sexual assault of a child placed in substitute care
✓ current as of July 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WI-LEGdocs.legis.wisconsin.gov
JustiaChapter on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
948.085948.085 Sexual assault of a child placed in substitute care. Whoever does any of the following is guilty of a Class C felony:
948.085(1)(1) Has sexual contact or sexual intercourse with a child for whom the actor is a foster parent.
948.085(2)(2) Has sexual contact or sexual intercourse with a child who is placed in any of the following facilities if the actor works or volunteers at the facility or is directly or indirectly responsible for managing it:
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2007–2023 · leading case: John Doe 1 v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee, 2007 WI 95, 734 N.W.2d 827.
John Doe 1 v. Archdiocese of Milwaukee, 2007 WI 95, 734 N.W.2d 827. “06 refers to "[i]ncest with a child"; Wis. Stat. § 948.085 refers to "[s]exual assault of a child placed in substitute care"; Wis.”
State v. Michael L. Cox, 2018 WI 67, 913 N.W.2d 780. “025 (2011-12) ); and (4) sexual assault of a child placed in substitute care ( Wis. Stat. § 948.085 (2011-12) ). 9 We interpret statutes "reasonably, to avoid absurd or unreasonable results.”
Femala Fleming v. Amateur Athletic Union of the United States, Inc., 2023 WI 40, 990 N.W.2d 244. “06 ), sexual assault of a child placed in substitute care ( Wis. Stat. § 948.085 ), and sexual assault of a child by a school staff person or a person who works or volunteers with children ( Wis.”
Femala Fleming v. Amateur Athletic Union of the United States, Inc., 2022 WI App 46, 979 N.W.2d 614. “06), sexual assault of a child placed in substitute care (§ 948.085), and sexual assault of a child by a school staff person or a person who works or volunteers with children (§ 948.”
State v. Michael L. Cox (Wis. 2018). “02 (1) and (2) (2011-12), respectively); (3) repeated sexual assault of the same child ( Wis.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.