State v. Faison, 967 A.2d 507 (Conn. 2009). · Go Syfert
Search
State v. Faison, 967 A.2d 507 (Conn. 2009). Cases Citing This Book View Copy Cite
56 citation events (56 in the last 25 years) across 2 distinct courts.
Strongest positive: State v. Jarmon (connappct, 2020-01-14)
Treatment trajectory · 2009 → 2026 · click a year to view as-of
2009 2017 2026
Top citers, strongest first. 5 distinct citers. How cited ↗
discussed Cited "see" State v. Jarmon (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Faison, 112 Conn. App. 373, 380 , 962 A.2d 860 (trial counsel’s ‘‘general exhortation[s]’’ were inadequate to preserve claims presented on appeal), cert. denied, 291 Conn. 903 , 967 A.2d 507 (2009). 12 Under Golding, ‘‘a defendant can prevail on a claim of constitutional error not preserved at trial only if all of the following conditions are met: (1) the record is adequate to review the alleged claim of error; (2) the claim is of constitutional magnitude alleging the violation of a fundamental right; (3) the alleged constitutional violation . . . exists and . . . de…
discussed Cited "see" State v. Jarmon (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2020 · signal: see · confidence high
See State v. Faison, 112 Conn. App. 373, 380 , 962 A.2d 860 (trial counsel’s ‘‘general exhortation[s]’’ were inadequate to preserve claims presented on appeal), cert. denied, 291 Conn. 903 , 967 A.2d 507 (2009). 12 Under Golding, ‘‘a defendant can prevail on a claim of constitutional error not preserved at trial only if all of the following conditions are met: (1) the record is adequate to review the alleged claim of error; (2) the claim is of constitutional magnitude alleging the violation of a fundamental right; (3) the alleged constitutional violation . . . exists and . . . de…
discussed Cited "see" Doe v. Hartford Roman Catholic Diocesan Corp.
Conn. · 2015 · signal: see · confidence high
First, the deposition was taken under oath, which is ‘‘a critical component of the trustworthiness and reliability calcu- lus.’’ State v. Faison, 112 Conn. App. 373, 384 , 962 A.2d 860 , cert. denied, 291 Conn. 903 , 967 A.2d 507 (2009); see id.
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. Lahai (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2011 · signal: see also · confidence low
Practice Book § 60-5; see also State v. Faison, 112 Conn. App. 373, 379-80 , 962 A.2d 860 , cert. denied, 291 Conn. 903 , 967 A.2d 507 (2009).
discussed Cited "see, e.g." State v. FAVOCCIA (2×)
Conn. App. Ct. · 2010 · signal: see also · confidence low
Practice Book § 60-5; see also State v. Faison, 112 Conn. App. 373, 379-80 , 962 A.2d 860 , cert. denied, 291 Conn. 903 , 967 A.2d 507 (2009).
Retrieving the full opinion text from the archive…
State of Connecticut
v.
Jason Faison
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Mar 17, 2009.
967 A.2d 507
Charles F. Willson, special public defender, in support of the petition., RobinS. Schwartz, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.
McLachlan.
Cited by 24 opinions  |  Published

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 112 Conn. App. 373 (AC 28476), is denied.

MCLACHLAN, J.,

did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

[*904] Decided March 17, 2009 RobinS. Schwartz, assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.