Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1871–1994 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Schippers v. State
green
2 sentences1994While the reservation clause would remove the barrier imposed by Thompson v. State (1993), Ind.App., 617 N.E.2d 576 , trans. denied and Schippers v. State (1993), Ind.App., 622 N.E.2d 993 , the trial court must still be convinced a sentence reduction would be in the best interest of justice. 1994While the reservation clause would remove the barrier imposed by Thompson v. State (1993), Ind. App., 617 N.E.2d 576 , trans. denied and Schippers v. State (1993), Ind. App., 622 N.E.2d 993 , the trial court must still be convinced a sentence reduction would be in the best interest of justice. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Thompson v. State
green
2 sentences1994While the reservation clause would remove the barrier imposed by Thompson v. State (1993), Ind.App., 617 N.E.2d 576 , trans. denied and Schippers v. State (1993), Ind.App., 622 N.E.2d 993 , the trial court must still be convinced a sentence reduction would be in the best interest of justice. 1994While the reservation clause would remove the barrier imposed by Thompson v. State (1993), Ind. App., 617 N.E.2d 576 , trans. denied and Schippers v. State (1993), Ind. App., 622 N.E.2d 993 , the trial court must still be convinced a sentence reduction would be in the best interest of justice. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Maclary v. Morgan
neutral
2 sentences1925In Maclary v. Morgan (1918), 230 Mass. 80 , 119 N. E. 189 , Bowditch, the owner of two tracts of land caused a plat to be made dividing them into lots, after which he sold and conveyed the same to the defendant and Leroy Morgan. 1925In Maclary v. Morgan (1918), 230 Mass. 80 , 119 N. E. 189 , Bowditch, the owner of two tracts of land caused a plat to be made dividing them into lots, after which he sold and conveyed the same to the defendant and Leroy Morgan. | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Edward P. Fourniquet and Wife, and Martin W. Ewing and Wife v. John Perkins
green
2 sentences1921However, as is stated in Ryon, Rec., v. Thomas, supra, 62 , “interlocutory orders, when within the jurisdiction of the court, are, as to all matters properly embraced within them, of binding authority so long as they remain in force, but they are within the control of the court making them until the proceeding or cause in which, they are made is finally disposed of.” See also: Fourniquct v. Perkins (1853), 57 U. S. (16 How.) 82 , 85, 14 L. 1921However, as is stated in Ryon, Rec., v. Thomas, supra, 62 , “interlocutory orders, when within the jurisdiction of the court, are, as to all matters properly embraced within them, of binding authority so long as they remain in force, but they are within the control of the court making them until the proceeding or cause in which, they are made is finally disposed of.” See also: Fourniquct v. Perkins (1853), 57 U. S. (16 How.) 82 , 85, 14 L. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Ryon v. Thomas
green
2 sentences1921As such, it might properly have been set aside on appellant’s motion, if found to be erroneous (Ryon, Rec., v. Thomas [1885], 104 Ind. 59, 63 , 3 N. E. 653 ; Johnson v. Moore [1887], 112 Ind. 91, 92 , 13 N. E. 106 ), and the reservation of an exception to the. original order was not a prerequisite to the motion to vacate, although it was essential to the review of such interlocutory ruling on appeal. 1921As such, it might properly have been set aside on appellant’s motion, if found to be erroneous (Ryon, Rec., v. Thomas [1885], 104 Ind. 59, 63 , 3 N. E. 653 ; Johnson v. Moore [1887], 112 Ind. 91, 92 , 13 N. E. 106 ), and the reservation of an exception to the. original order was not a prerequisite to the motion to vacate, although it was essential to the review of such interlocutory ruling on appeal. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Johnson v. Moore
neutral
1 sentence1921As such, it might properly have been set aside on appellant’s motion, if found to be erroneous (Ryon, Rec., v. Thomas [1885], 104 Ind. 59, 63 , 3 N. E. 653 ; Johnson v. Moore [1887], 112 Ind. 91, 92 , 13 N. E. 106 ), and the reservation of an exception to the. original order was not a prerequisite to the motion to vacate, although it was essential to the review of such interlocutory ruling on appeal. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Davidson v. Hutchins
neutral
1 sentence1921As such, it might properly have been set aside on appellant’s motion, if found to be erroneous (Ryon, Rec., v. Thomas [1885], 104 Ind. 59, 63 , 3 N. E. 653 ; Johnson v. Moore [1887], 112 Ind. 91, 92 , 13 N. E. 106 ), and the reservation of an exception to the. original order was not a prerequisite to the motion to vacate, although it was essential to the review of such interlocutory ruling on appeal. | 1 | 1921–1921 |
Blizzard v. Blizzard
neutral
1 sentence1884Blizzard v. Blizzard, supra; Beeber v. Bevan, 80 Ind. 31 ; Coulter v. Coulter, 81 Ind. 542 . | 1 | 1884–1884 |
Beeber v. Bevan
neutral
1 sentence1884Blizzard v. Blizzard, supra; Beeber v. Bevan, 80 Ind. 31 ; Coulter v. Coulter, 81 Ind. 542 . | 1 | 1884–1884 |
Coulter v. Coulter
neutral
1 sentence1884Blizzard v. Blizzard, supra; Beeber v. Bevan, 80 Ind. 31 ; Coulter v. Coulter, 81 Ind. 542 . | 1 | 1884–1884 |
Cross v. Pearson
neutral
1 sentence1871The above case is in direct and irreconcilable conflict with the case of Cross v. Pearson, supra. In the one it was held that the instruction must be authenticated by the signature of the judge, while in the other it was held that if it was signed by the judge instead of the party or the attorney, it was not a proper reservation of the exception. | 1 | 1871–1871 |
Newby v. Warren
neutral
1 sentence1871The ruling in the case of Newby v. Warren, 24 Ind. 161 , was followed in the case of Medler v. The State, 26 Ind. 171 . | 1 | 1871–1871 |
Medler v. State ex rel. Dunn
neutral
1 sentence1871The ruling in the case of Newby v. Warren, 24 Ind. 161 , was followed in the case of Medler v. The State, 26 Ind. 171 . | 1 | 1871–1871 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.