5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. Smithred2 sentences2013See 494 U.S. at 878 (“[I]f prohibiting the exercise of religion is not tire object of. . . but merely the incidental effect of a generally applicable and otherwise valid provision, the First Amendment has not been offended.”); 494 U.S. at 886 n.3 (no compelling governmental interest required to support law); GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. Georgia, 687 F.3d 1244 , 1255 n.21 (11th Cir. 2012) (rational basis sufficient to deflect Free Exercise challenge to neutral, generally applicable law); Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. Hooker, 680 F.3d 194, 210-12 (2d Cir. 2012) (recognizing and applyin 2013See 494 U.S. at 878 (“[I]f prohibiting the exercise of religion is not tire object of. . . but merely the incidental effect of a generally applicable and otherwise valid provision, the First Amendment has not been offended.”); 494 U.S. at 886 n.3 (no compelling governmental interest required to support law); GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. Georgia, 687 F.3d 1244 , 1255 n.21 (11th Cir. 2012) (rational basis sufficient to deflect Free Exercise challenge to neutral, generally applicable law); Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. Hooker, 680 F.3d 194, 210-12 (2d Cir. 2012) (recognizing and applyin | 1 | 2 |
Brown v. City of Pittsburghgreen1 sentence2013See 494 U.S. at 878 (“[I]f prohibiting the exercise of religion is not tire object of. . . but merely the incidental effect of a generally applicable and otherwise valid provision, the First Amendment has not been offended.”); 494 U.S. at 886 n.3 (no compelling governmental interest required to support law); GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. Georgia, 687 F.3d 1244 , 1255 n.21 (11th Cir. 2012) (rational basis sufficient to deflect Free Exercise challenge to neutral, generally applicable law); Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. Hooker, 680 F.3d 194, 210-12 (2d Cir. 2012) (recognizing and applyin | 1 | 1 |
Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. Hookergreen1 sentence2013See 494 U.S. at 878 (“[I]f prohibiting the exercise of religion is not tire object of. . . but merely the incidental effect of a generally applicable and otherwise valid provision, the First Amendment has not been offended.”); 494 U.S. at 886 n.3 (no compelling governmental interest required to support law); GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. Georgia, 687 F.3d 1244 , 1255 n.21 (11th Cir. 2012) (rational basis sufficient to deflect Free Exercise challenge to neutral, generally applicable law); Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. Hooker, 680 F.3d 194, 210-12 (2d Cir. 2012) (recognizing and applyin | 1 | 1 |
Grace United Methodist Church v. City Of Cheyennegreen2 sentences2011The Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals disagreed, describing the church’s argument as “asking us to adopt a per se rule requiring that any land use regulation which permits any secular exception satisfy a strict scrutiny test to survive a free exercise challenge.” 451 F.3d at 651. 2011In declining to do so, the Tenth Circuit focused on the fact that the record did not show any evidence that the zoning regulations were enacted for the purpose of restricting free exercise of religion. 451 F.3d at 653. | 1 | 1 |
Frank Africa v. The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Leroy S. Zimmerman (Attorney General) Bureau of Corrections Ronald Marks (Commissioner of b.o.c.)green1 sentence2008Africa, 662 F.2d 1025, 1033-34 (C.A. | 1 | 1 |
Faith Builders Church, Inc. v. Department of Revenuegreen1 sentence2008See Faith Builders Church, Inc. v. Department of Revenue, 378 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Turner v. Safley
green
2 sentences2020Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89 , 107 S. Ct. 2254 , 96 L. 2020Turner v. Safley, 482 U.S. 78, 89 , 107 S. Ct. 2254 , 96 L. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of Hialeah
green
1 sentence2013A law is not considered neutral “if [its] object is to infringe upon or restrict practices because of their religious motivation.” Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, 508 U.S. at 533 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Minersville School District v. Gobitis
red
2 sentences2013The Smith decision pointed to longstanding Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence recognizing: “ 'Conscientious scruples have not, in the course of the long struggle for religious toleration, relieved the individual from obedience to a general, law not aimed at the promotion or restriction of religious beliefs.’ ” Smith, 494 U.S. at 879 (quoting Minersville District v. Gobitis, 310 U.S. 586, 594 , 60 S. Ct. 1010 , 84 L. 2013The Smith decision pointed to longstanding Free Exercise Clause jurisprudence recognizing: “ 'Conscientious scruples have not, in the course of the long struggle for religious toleration, relieved the individual from obedience to a general, law not aimed at the promotion or restriction of religious beliefs.’ ” Smith, 494 U.S. at 879 (quoting Minersville District v. Gobitis, 310 U.S. 586, 594 , 60 S. Ct. 1010 , 84 L. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. The State of Georgia
green
1 sentence2013See 494 U.S. at 878 (“[I]f prohibiting the exercise of religion is not tire object of. . . but merely the incidental effect of a generally applicable and otherwise valid provision, the First Amendment has not been offended.”); 494 U.S. at 886 n.3 (no compelling governmental interest required to support law); GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. Georgia, 687 F.3d 1244 , 1255 n.21 (11th Cir. 2012) (rational basis sufficient to deflect Free Exercise challenge to neutral, generally applicable law); Commack Self-Service Kosher Meats, Inc. v. Hooker, 680 F.3d 194, 210-12 (2d Cir. 2012) (recognizing and applyin | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Murdock v. Pennsylvania
green
2 sentences1980In support of their argument that the modest fee fixed by statute for an annual license constitutes a per se violation of the free exercise clause, appellants rely upon Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 , 87 L.Ed. 1292 , 63 S.Ct. 870 (1943). 1980In support of their argument that the modest fee fixed by statute for an annual license constitutes a per se violation of the free exercise clause, appellants rely upon Murdock v. Pennsylvania, 319 U.S. 105 , 87 L.Ed. 1292 , 63 S.Ct. 870 (1943). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Wisconsin v. Yoder
green
2 sentences1980Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 219-220 , 32 L.Ed.2d 15 , 92 S.Ct. 1526 (1972). 1980Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205, 219-220 , 32 L.Ed.2d 15 , 92 S.Ct. 1526 (1972). | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.