5 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1914–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Keel
green
1 sentence2020Keel, 302 Kan. 560 , Syl. ¶ 2. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
State v. Reid
green
1 sentence2011State v. Reid, 190 Or. | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Chasteen v. Childers
green
2 sentences1985However, the court in Chasteen v. Childers, 218 Kan. 519, 525 , 546 P.2d 935 (1976), relied in part on the plaintiff s lack of possession of certain horses in holding that the plaintiff was not entitled to a lien under 58-207. 1985However, the court in Chasteen v. Childers, 218 Kan. 519, 525 , 546 P.2d 935 (1976), relied in part on the plaintiff s lack of possession of certain horses in holding that the plaintiff was not entitled to a lien under 58-207. | 1 | 1985–1985 |
State v. Phinis
green
2 sentences1978Spencer, J.: Defendant was convicted of the unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of K.S.A. 21-4204(l)(b), which provides: “(1) Unlawful possession of a firearm is: “(b) Possession of a firearm with a barrel less than twelve (12) inches long by a person who, within five (5) years preceding such violation has been convicted of a felony under the laws of Kansas or any other jurisdiction or has been released from imprisonment for a felony.” The possession requirement of this state has been discussed in State v. Phinis, 199 Kan. 472 , 430 P.2d 251 (1967); State v. Runnels, 203 Kan. 513 , 4 1978Spencer, J.: Defendant was convicted of the unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of K.S.A. 21-4204(l)(b), which provides: “(1) Unlawful possession of a firearm is: “(b) Possession of a firearm with a barrel less than twelve (12) inches long by a person who, within five (5) years preceding such violation has been convicted of a felony under the laws of Kansas or any other jurisdiction or has been released from imprisonment for a felony.” The possession requirement of this state has been discussed in State v. Phinis, 199 Kan. 472 , 430 P.2d 251 (1967); State v. Runnels, 203 Kan. 513 , 4 | 1 | 1978–1978 |
State v. Knowles
green
2 sentences1978Spencer, J.: Defendant was convicted of the unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of K.S.A. 21-4204(l)(b), which provides: “(1) Unlawful possession of a firearm is: “(b) Possession of a firearm with a barrel less than twelve (12) inches long by a person who, within five (5) years preceding such violation has been convicted of a felony under the laws of Kansas or any other jurisdiction or has been released from imprisonment for a felony.” The possession requirement of this state has been discussed in State v. Phinis, 199 Kan. 472 , 430 P.2d 251 (1967); State v. Runnels, 203 Kan. 513 , 4 1978Spencer, J.: Defendant was convicted of the unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of K.S.A. 21-4204(l)(b), which provides: “(1) Unlawful possession of a firearm is: “(b) Possession of a firearm with a barrel less than twelve (12) inches long by a person who, within five (5) years preceding such violation has been convicted of a felony under the laws of Kansas or any other jurisdiction or has been released from imprisonment for a felony.” The possession requirement of this state has been discussed in State v. Phinis, 199 Kan. 472 , 430 P.2d 251 (1967); State v. Runnels, 203 Kan. 513 , 4 | 1 | 1978–1978 |
State v. Neal
green
2 sentences1978Spencer, J.: Defendant was convicted of the unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of K.S.A. 21-4204(l)(b), which provides: “(1) Unlawful possession of a firearm is: “(b) Possession of a firearm with a barrel less than twelve (12) inches long by a person who, within five (5) years preceding such violation has been convicted of a felony under the laws of Kansas or any other jurisdiction or has been released from imprisonment for a felony.” The possession requirement of this state has been discussed in State v. Phinis, 199 Kan. 472 , 430 P.2d 251 (1967); State v. Runnels, 203 Kan. 513 , 4 1978Spencer, J.: Defendant was convicted of the unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of K.S.A. 21-4204(l)(b), which provides: “(1) Unlawful possession of a firearm is: “(b) Possession of a firearm with a barrel less than twelve (12) inches long by a person who, within five (5) years preceding such violation has been convicted of a felony under the laws of Kansas or any other jurisdiction or has been released from imprisonment for a felony.” The possession requirement of this state has been discussed in State v. Phinis, 199 Kan. 472 , 430 P.2d 251 (1967); State v. Runnels, 203 Kan. 513 , 4 | 1 | 1978–1978 |
State v. Runnels
green
2 sentences1978Spencer, J.: Defendant was convicted of the unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of K.S.A. 21-4204(l)(b), which provides: “(1) Unlawful possession of a firearm is: “(b) Possession of a firearm with a barrel less than twelve (12) inches long by a person who, within five (5) years preceding such violation has been convicted of a felony under the laws of Kansas or any other jurisdiction or has been released from imprisonment for a felony.” The possession requirement of this state has been discussed in State v. Phinis, 199 Kan. 472 , 430 P.2d 251 (1967); State v. Runnels, 203 Kan. 513 , 4 1978Spencer, J.: Defendant was convicted of the unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of K.S.A. 21-4204(l)(b), which provides: “(1) Unlawful possession of a firearm is: “(b) Possession of a firearm with a barrel less than twelve (12) inches long by a person who, within five (5) years preceding such violation has been convicted of a felony under the laws of Kansas or any other jurisdiction or has been released from imprisonment for a felony.” The possession requirement of this state has been discussed in State v. Phinis, 199 Kan. 472 , 430 P.2d 251 (1967); State v. Runnels, 203 Kan. 513 , 4 | 1 | 1978–1978 |
State v. Ames
green
2 sentences1978Spencer, J.: Defendant was convicted of the unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of K.S.A. 21-4204(l)(b), which provides: “(1) Unlawful possession of a firearm is: “(b) Possession of a firearm with a barrel less than twelve (12) inches long by a person who, within five (5) years preceding such violation has been convicted of a felony under the laws of Kansas or any other jurisdiction or has been released from imprisonment for a felony.” The possession requirement of this state has been discussed in State v. Phinis, 199 Kan. 472 , 430 P.2d 251 (1967); State v. Runnels, 203 Kan. 513 , 4 1978Spencer, J.: Defendant was convicted of the unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of K.S.A. 21-4204(l)(b), which provides: “(1) Unlawful possession of a firearm is: “(b) Possession of a firearm with a barrel less than twelve (12) inches long by a person who, within five (5) years preceding such violation has been convicted of a felony under the laws of Kansas or any other jurisdiction or has been released from imprisonment for a felony.” The possession requirement of this state has been discussed in State v. Phinis, 199 Kan. 472 , 430 P.2d 251 (1967); State v. Runnels, 203 Kan. 513 , 4 | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Goodman v. Nichols
green
1 sentence1914It is settled that possession to be adverse need not be under color of title (Goodwin v. Nichols, 44 Kan. 22 , 23 Pac. 957 ; Anderson v. Burnham, 52 Kan. 454 , 34 Pac. 1056 ; Guinn v. Spillman, 52 Kan. 496 , 35 Pac. 13 ; Pratt v. Ard, 63 Kan. 182 , 65 Pac. 255 ), but the defendant argues that it is essential that the possession be under claim of right. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Anderson v. Burnham
neutral
1 sentence1914It is settled that possession to be adverse need not be under color of title (Goodwin v. Nichols, 44 Kan. 22 , 23 Pac. 957 ; Anderson v. Burnham, 52 Kan. 454 , 34 Pac. 1056 ; Guinn v. Spillman, 52 Kan. 496 , 35 Pac. 13 ; Pratt v. Ard, 63 Kan. 182 , 65 Pac. 255 ), but the defendant argues that it is essential that the possession be under claim of right. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Guinn v. Spillman
neutral
1 sentence1914It is settled that possession to be adverse need not be under color of title (Goodwin v. Nichols, 44 Kan. 22 , 23 Pac. 957 ; Anderson v. Burnham, 52 Kan. 454 , 34 Pac. 1056 ; Guinn v. Spillman, 52 Kan. 496 , 35 Pac. 13 ; Pratt v. Ard, 63 Kan. 182 , 65 Pac. 255 ), but the defendant argues that it is essential that the possession be under claim of right. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Pratt v. Ard
green
2 sentences1914It is settled that possession to be adverse need not be under color of title (Goodwin v. Nichols, 44 Kan. 22 , 23 Pac. 957 ; Anderson v. Burnham, 52 Kan. 454 , 34 Pac. 1056 ; Guinn v. Spillman, 52 Kan. 496 , 35 Pac. 13 ; Pratt v. Ard, 63 Kan. 182 , 65 Pac. 255 ), but the defendant argues that it is essential that the possession be under claim of right. 1914It is settled that possession to be adverse need not be under color of title (Goodwin v. Nichols, 44 Kan. 22 , 23 Pac. 957 ; Anderson v. Burnham, 52 Kan. 454 , 34 Pac. 1056 ; Guinn v. Spillman, 52 Kan. 496 , 35 Pac. 13 ; Pratt v. Ard, 63 Kan. 182 , 65 Pac. 255 ), but the defendant argues that it is essential that the possession be under claim of right. | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.