Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Colorado opinions name it 1 courts 1979–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Haydengreen1 sentence2001The possession must be "actual, adverse, hostile, under claim of right, exclusive and uninterrupted for the statutory period." Smith v. Hayden, 772 P2d 47, 52 (Colo.1989). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Maesgreen1 sentence1980See People v. Maes, Colo.App., 607 P.2d 1028 (1979). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Denver West Metropolitan District v. Geudner
green
1 sentence2017Under these circumstances, we must carefully scrutinize the District's decision to take Parcel C to ensure that it was not tainted by "bad faith." Id. at 436 . ¶ 43 In our view, the evidence demonstrates that it was: • From January 24, 2014, when it was executed, until March 16, 2015, a few days before the possession hearing, the Agreement required the Developer to acquire Parcel C, as part of a condition of "consolidated ownership" of Parcels A, B, and C. • The Developer knew that it could not obtain approval for its final plat without acquiring Parcel C. • When Woodcrest balked at the Develo | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Adcock v. Lieber
green
2 sentences1998Since equitable defenses may be interposed in FED actions, see McCrimmon v. Raymond, 77 Colo. 81 , 234 P. 1058 (1925); Adcock v. Lieber, 51 Colo. 373 , 117 P. 993 (1911), and since the trial court acted within its discretion in ruling that evidence offered by tenant was relevant to her equitable defenses, we disagree with landlord’s first contention. 1998Since equitable defenses may be interposed in FED actions, see McCrimmon v. Raymond, 77 Colo. 81 , 234 P. 1058 (1925); Adcock v. Lieber, 51 Colo. 373 , 117 P. 993 (1911), and since the trial court acted within its discretion in ruling that evidence offered by tenant was relevant to her equitable defenses, we disagree with landlord’s first contention. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
McCrimmon v. Raymond
neutral
2 sentences1998Since equitable defenses may be interposed in FED actions, see McCrimmon v. Raymond, 77 Colo. 81 , 234 P. 1058 (1925); Adcock v. Lieber, 51 Colo. 373 , 117 P. 993 (1911), and since the trial court acted within its discretion in ruling that evidence offered by tenant was relevant to her equitable defenses, we disagree with landlord’s first contention. 1998Since equitable defenses may be interposed in FED actions, see McCrimmon v. Raymond, 77 Colo. 81 , 234 P. 1058 (1925); Adcock v. Lieber, 51 Colo. 373 , 117 P. 993 (1911), and since the trial court acted within its discretion in ruling that evidence offered by tenant was relevant to her equitable defenses, we disagree with landlord’s first contention. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
BD. OF CTY. COM'RS OF GARFIELD CTY. v. Delaney
green
2 sentences1983In support of her argument, she relies almost exclusively upon our decision of Board of County Commissioners v. Delaney, 41 Colo.App. 548 , 592 P.2d 1338 (1978). 1983In support of her argument, she relies almost exclusively upon our decision of Board of County Commissioners v. Delaney, 41 Colo.App. 548 , 592 P.2d 1338 (1978). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
People v. McClendon
green
2 sentences1979In recognition of this, the court in Wells expressly approved the inference of guilt which may be drawn, and refused to disturb the holding of People v. McClendon, 188 Colo. 140 , 533 P.2d 923 (1975), a burglary case, that the protective ambit of due process was not violated by a recent possession instruction. 1979In recognition of this, the court in Wells expressly approved the inference of guilt which may be drawn, and refused to disturb the holding of People v. McClendon, 188 Colo. 140 , 533 P.2d 923 (1975), a burglary case, that the protective ambit of due process was not violated by a recent possession instruction. | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.