possession claim in Oregon

2011Under ORS 105.620(2)(a), a claimant “maintains ‘hostile possession’ of property if the possession is under claim of right or with color of title.” A “claim of right” may be established through proof of “an honest but mistaken belief of ownership, resulting, for example, from a mistake as to the correct location of a boundary.” Stiles, 233 Or App at 127 ; Hoffman v. Freeman Land and Timber, LLC., 329 Or 554 , 561 n 4, 994 P2d 106 (1999).

2011Under ORS 105.620(2)(a), a claimant “maintains ‘hostile possession’ of property if the possession is under claim of right or with color of title.” A “claim of right” may be established through proof of “an honest but mistaken belief of ownership, resulting, for example, from a mistake as to the correct location of a boundary.” Stiles, 233 Or App at 127 ; Hoffman v. Freeman Land and Timber, LLC., 329 Or 554 , 561 n 4, 994 P2d 106 (1999).

2025“A person maintains ‘hostile possession’ of prop- erty if the possession is under claim of right or with color of title.” ORS 105.620(2)(a). o “Claim of right” requires either “hostility in fact” or a “pure mistake.” Sholl v. Anderson, 182 Or App 659, 665 , 50 P3d 1248 (2002).

2025“A person maintains ‘hostile possession’ of prop- erty if the possession is under claim of right or with color of title.” ORS 105.620(2)(a). o “Claim of right” requires either “hostility in fact” or a “pure mistake.” Sholl v. Anderson, 182 Or App 659, 665 , 50 P3d 1248 (2002).

2020“Color of title” means that a person “claims under a written conveyance of the property or by operation of law from one claiming under a written conveyance.” Id.

2011Under ORS 105.620(2)(a), a claimant “maintains ‘hostile possession’ of property if the possession is under claim of right or with color of title.” A “claim of right” may be established through proof of “an honest but mistaken belief of ownership, resulting, for example, from a mistake as to the correct location of a boundary.” Stiles, 233 Or App at 127 ; Hoffman v. Freeman Land and Timber, LLC., 329 Or 554 , 561 n 4, 994 P2d 106 (1999).

2009ORS 105.620(2)(a) defines “hostility” as follows: “A person maintains ‘hostile possession’ of property if the possession is under claim of right or with color of title. ‘Color of title’ means the adverse possessor claims under a written conveyance of the property or by operation of law from one claiming under a written conveyance.” In enacting ORS 105.620(2)(a), “the legislature intended the element of hostility to retain its common-law meaning.” Clark v. Ranchero Acres Water Co., 198 Or App 73, 80 , 108 P3d 31 (2005).

2009ORS 105.620(2)(a) defines “hostility” as follows: “A person maintains ‘hostile possession’ of property if the possession is under claim of right or with color of title. ‘Color of title’ means the adverse possessor claims under a written conveyance of the property or by operation of law from one claiming under a written conveyance.” In enacting ORS 105.620(2)(a), “the legislature intended the element of hostility to retain its common-law meaning.” Clark v. Ranchero Acres Water Co., 198 Or App 73, 80 , 108 P3d 31 (2005).

1918Law 463 ( 33 Atl. 940, 942 ), the plaintiff was injured by being run over in the public street by a wagon drawn by two horses and there was evidence to show that the United States Express Company was the owner.

1912Hanson v. Ingwaldson, 77 Minn. 533 ( 80 N. W. 702 : 77 Am.

1912Hanson v. Ingwaldson, 77 Minn. 533 ( 80 N. W. 702 : 77 Am.

1899Laws, § 13; Richards v. Griffith, 1 Kan.