Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 2016–2022 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Smith v. Doegreen2 sentences2021EXCESSIVENESS The final Mendoza-Martinez factor to be assessed is “whether the regulatory means chosen are reasonable in light of the nonpunitive objective.” Smith, 538 US at 105 (opinion of the Court). 2021EXCESSIVENESS The final Mendoza-Martinez factor to be assessed is “whether the regulatory means chosen are reasonable in light of the nonpunitive objective.” Smith, 538 US at 105 (opinion of the Court). | 2 | 2 |
Weymers v. Kheragreen1 sentence2016See Weymers v Khera, 454 Mich 639, 654 (1997); MCR 2.111(B)(1) (stating a pleading must contain “the specific allegations necessary reasonably to inform the adverse party of the nature of the claims the adverse party is called on to defend”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Watkins; People v. Pullen
green
1 sentence2022As a result, “the fact that the 10 Although these concerns also apply to evidence of the 2002 conviction, the unfair prejudice in that circumstance is lessened because the defendant is no longer presumed innocent of that crime. 11 While a limiting instruction is a tool in the trial court’s arsenal to prevent the jury from misusing other-acts evidence, see Watkins, 491 Mich at 490 , we believe that the risk of unfair prejudice from admission of this acquitted conduct is too great for any instruction to mitigate its effect. -10- defendant is forced to relitigate his participation in a prior crim | 1 | 2022–2022 |
People v. Tennille; People v. Rutledge
green
2 sentences2020Tennille, 315 Mich App at 63 . -6- protests. 2020Id. | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.