low bar in Washington

2021It represents a low bar, such that “[e]ven minimally relevant evidence is admissible.” State v. Darden, 145 Wn.2d 612, 621 , 41 20 No. 37153-1-III State v. Harper P.3d 1189 (2002).

2021Relevance, therefore, represents a low bar and “[e]ven minimally relevant evidence is admissible.” State v. Darden, 145 Wn.2d 612, 621 , 41 P.3d 1189 (2002).

2021Relevance, therefore, represents a low bar and “[e]ven minimally relevant evidence is admissible.” State v. Darden, 145 Wn.2d 612, 621 , 41 P.3d 1189 (2002).

2021It represents a low bar, such that “[e]ven minimally relevant evidence is admissible.” State v. Darden, 145 Wn.2d 612, 621 , 41 P.3d 1189 (2002).

2018Schierman cites State v. Ellis, 136 Wn.2d 498 , 963 P.2d 843 (1998), arguing that it established a low bar for the admission of"expert testimony on diminished capacity," at least in capital cases.

2018Schierman cites State v. Ellis , 136 Wash.2d 498 , 963 P.2d 843 (1998), arguing that it established a low bar for the admission of "expert testimony on diminished capacity," at least in capital cases.

2018Schierman cites State v. Ellis, 136 Wn.2d 498 , 963 P.2d 843 (1998), arguing that it established a low bar for the admission of"expert testimony on diminished capacity," at least in capital cases.

2018Schierman cites State v. Ellis , 136 Wash.2d 498 , 963 P.2d 843 (1998), arguing that it established a low bar for the admission of "expert testimony on diminished capacity," at least in capital cases.

2015Id.

2015Id.

2015Nothing more must be shown than that the health care provider was engaged in an "'exercise of professional judgment' in treatment or diagnosis." !d. at 14 (quoting Miller III, 91 Wn.2d at 160 ).

2015Nothing more must be shown than that the health care provider was engaged in an “ ‘exercise of professional judgment’ in treatment or diagnosis.” Id. at 808 (quoting Miller III, 91 Wn.2d at 160 ).

2015Id. 12 Fergen v. Sestero, No. 88819-1 Turning to some of the decisions by the appellate courts, we consistently see a low bar that must be satisfied for the court to hold that a physician made a choice between treatments or diagnoses.

2015Id. ¶23 Turning to some of the decisions by the appellate courts, we consistently see a low bar that must be satisfied for the court to hold that a physician made a choice between treatments or diagnoses.

2008In In re Interest of Jerrell C.J., 2005 WI 105 , 283 Wis. 2d 145 , 699 N.W.2d 110 , a 14-year-old, with a low standard range of intelligence and previous school records showing average to failing grades with a more recent 3.6 grade point average, was handcuffed to a wall and left alone for approximately two hours and then interrogated for five and one-half hours before signing a confession.

2008In In re Interest of Jerrell C.J., 2005 WI 105 , 283 Wis. 2d 145 , 699 N.W.2d 110 , a 14-year-old, with a low standard range of intelligence and previous school records showing average to failing grades with a more recent 3.6 grade point average, was handcuffed to a wall and left alone for approximately two hours and then interrogated for five and one-half hours before signing a confession.

2023The court also set a low bar for proving a road opened, holding that “[t]he public is not, under all circumstances, obliged to take physical possession of public highways whether they have been acquired by dedication or otherwise, in order to preserve its rights therein.” Id. at 326 .

2021Under ER 403, relevant evidence “may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.” In cases involving sexual crimes, factors that may be considered in balancing include “the need for the evidence, the secrecy surrounding sex abuse offenses,” the vulnerability and age of the victim, as well as the lack of physical proof and the “‘degree of public opprobrium associated with the accusation.’” State v. DeVincentis, 150 Wn.2d 11, 23 , 74 P.3d 119 (2003) (quoting Report of Proceedings at 130). 7 No. 53269-7-II We review the trial court's decision

2021Under ER 403, relevant evidence “may be excluded if its probative value is substantially outweighed by the danger of unfair prejudice.” In cases involving sexual crimes, factors that may be considered in balancing include “the need for the evidence, the secrecy surrounding sex abuse offenses,” the vulnerability and age of the victim, as well as the lack of physical proof and the “‘degree of public opprobrium associated with the accusation.’” State v. DeVincentis, 150 Wn.2d 11, 23 , 74 P.3d 119 (2003) (quoting Report of Proceedings at 130). 7 No. 53269-7-II We review the trial court's decision

2020RCW 5.60.020; State v. Brousseau, 172 Wn.2d 331, 347 , 259 P.3d 209 (2011).

2020RCW 5.60.020; State v. Brousseau, 172 Wn.2d 331, 347 , 259 P.3d 209 (2011).

2020There is a low bar for finding a reasonable inference of neighborly sufferance or acquiescence, such as “‘persons travel[ing] the private road of a neighbor in conjunction with such neighbor and other persons, nothi[n]g further appearing.’” Roediger, 26 Wn.2d at 711 (quoting 2 GEORGE W.

2018As the Court of Appeals noted, "Schley's DOSA was functionally revoked once he was found guilty of fighting by 'some evidence' at the infraction hearing." Schley, 197 Wash. App. at 868 , 392 P.3d 1099 .

2018As the Court of Appeals noted, "Schley's DOSA was functionally revoked once he was found guilty of fighting by 'some evidence' at the infraction hearing." Schley, 197 Wash. App. at 868 , 392 P.3d 1099 .