Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Mississippi opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2003 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Mississippi courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. Albert A. Goldfarbgreen2 sentences2003See also United States v. Goldfarb, 328 F.2d 280, 282 (6th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 976 , 84 S.Ct. 1883 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 (1964); Hogan v. Zletz, 43 F.R.D. 308 (N.D.Okl.1967); aff'd sub nom., Natta v. Hogan, 392 F.2d 686 (10th Cir.). 2003See also United States v. Goldfarb, 328 F.2d 280, 282 (6th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 976 , 84 S.Ct. 1883 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 (1964); Hogan v. Zletz, 43 F.R.D. 308 (N.D.Okl.1967); aff'd sub nom., Natta v. Hogan, 392 F.2d 686 (10th Cir.). | 3 | 3 |
In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Served Upon Simon Horowitzgreen2 sentences2003To the contrary, ... the privilege stands in degrogation of the public’s ‘right to every man’s evidence,’ 8 Wigmore (McNaughton rev. ed.1961) s 2192 at 70, and as ‘an obstacle to the investigation of the truth,’ Id., s 2291 at 554; thus, as Wigmore has said, ‘It ought to be strictly confined within the narrowest possible limits consistent with the logic of its principle.’ In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2nd Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973). 2003To the contrary, ... the privilege stands in degrogation of the public's `right to every man's evidence,' 8 Wigmore (McNaughton rev. ed.1961) s 2192 at 70, and as `an obstacle to the investigation of the truth,' Id., s 2291 at 554; thus, as Wigmore has said, `It ought to be strictly confined within the narrowest possible limits consistent with the logic of its principle.' In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2nd Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973). | 3 | 3 |
Dombrowski v. Pfistergreen2 sentences2003See also United States v. Goldfarb, 328 F.2d 280, 282 (6th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 976 , 84 S.Ct. 1883 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 (1964); Hogan v. Zletz, 43 F.R.D. 308 (N.D.Okl.1967); aff'd sub nom., Natta v. Hogan, 392 F.2d 686 (10th Cir.). 2003See also United States v. Goldfarb, 328 F.2d 280, 282 (6th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 976 , 84 S.Ct. 1883 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 (1964); Hogan v. Zletz, 43 F.R.D. 308 (N.D.Okl.1967); aff'd sub nom., Natta v. Hogan, 392 F.2d 686 (10th Cir.). | 3 | 3 |
City of Detroit v. General Motors Corp.green2 sentences2003See also United States v. Goldfarb, 328 F.2d 280, 282 (6th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 976 , 84 S.Ct. 1883 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 (1964); Hogan v. Zletz, 43 F.R.D. 308 (N.D.Okl.1967); aff'd sub nom., Natta v. Hogan, 392 F.2d 686 (10th Cir.). 2003See also United States v. Goldfarb, 328 F.2d 280, 282 (6th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 976 , 84 S.Ct. 1883 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 (1964); Hogan v. Zletz, 43 F.R.D. 308 (N.D.Okl.1967); aff'd sub nom., Natta v. Hogan, 392 F.2d 686 (10th Cir.). | 3 | 3 |
Edgar v. Stategreen2 sentences2001This Court has previously stated that the "exhibition [of a firearm] ... accompanied by an expression of vexed discontent was sufficient to support a charge of simple assault." Edgar v. State, 202 Miss. 505, 508 , 32 So.2d 441, 442 (1947). 2001This Court has previously stated that the "exhibition [of a firearm] ... accompanied by an expression of vexed discontent was sufficient to support a charge of simple assault." Edgar v. State, 202 Miss. 505, 508 , 32 So.2d 441, 442 (1947). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Mississippi. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Hogan v. Zletz
green
2 sentences2003See also United States v. Goldfarb, 328 F.2d 280, 282 (6th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 976 , 84 S.Ct. 1883 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 (1964); Hogan v. Zletz, 43 F.R.D. 308 (N.D.Okl.1967); aff'd sub nom., Natta v. Hogan, 392 F.2d 686 (10th Cir.). 2003See also United States v. Goldfarb, 328 F.2d 280, 282 (6th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 976 , 84 S.Ct. 1883 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 (1964); Hogan v. Zletz, 43 F.R.D. 308 (N.D.Okl.1967); aff'd sub nom., Natta v. Hogan, 392 F.2d 686 (10th Cir.). | 3 | 1999–2003 |
cluster 279633
green
2 sentences2003See also United States v. Goldfarb, 328 F.2d 280, 282 (6th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 976 , 84 S.Ct. 1883 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 (1964); Hogan v. Zletz, 43 F.R.D. 308 (N.D.Okl.1967); aff'd sub nom., Natta v. Hogan, 392 F.2d 686 (10th Cir.). 2003See also United States v. Goldfarb, 328 F.2d 280, 282 (6th Cir.1964), cert. denied, 377 U.S. 976 , 84 S.Ct. 1883 , 12 L.Ed.2d 746 (1964); Hogan v. Zletz, 43 F.R.D. 308 (N.D.Okl.1967); aff'd sub nom., Natta v. Hogan, 392 F.2d 686 (10th Cir.). | 3 | 1999–2003 |
United States v. Jesse Ray Pipkins
green
2 sentences2003To the contrary, ... the privilege stands in degrogation of the public’s ‘right to every man’s evidence,’ 8 Wigmore (McNaughton rev. ed.1961) s 2192 at 70, and as ‘an obstacle to the investigation of the truth,’ Id., s 2291 at 554; thus, as Wigmore has said, ‘It ought to be strictly confined within the narrowest possible limits consistent with the logic of its principle.’ In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2nd Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973). 2003To the contrary, ... the privilege stands in degrogation of the public's `right to every man's evidence,' 8 Wigmore (McNaughton rev. ed.1961) s 2192 at 70, and as `an obstacle to the investigation of the truth,' Id., s 2291 at 554; thus, as Wigmore has said, `It ought to be strictly confined within the narrowest possible limits consistent with the logic of its principle.' In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2nd Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973). | 3 | 1999–2003 |
Patterson v. Johnson
green
2 sentences2003To the contrary, ... the privilege stands in degrogation of the public’s ‘right to every man’s evidence,’ 8 Wigmore (McNaughton rev. ed.1961) s 2192 at 70, and as ‘an obstacle to the investigation of the truth,’ Id., s 2291 at 554; thus, as Wigmore has said, ‘It ought to be strictly confined within the narrowest possible limits consistent with the logic of its principle.’ In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2nd Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973). 2003To the contrary, ... the privilege stands in degrogation of the public's `right to every man's evidence,' 8 Wigmore (McNaughton rev. ed.1961) s 2192 at 70, and as `an obstacle to the investigation of the truth,' Id., s 2291 at 554; thus, as Wigmore has said, `It ought to be strictly confined within the narrowest possible limits consistent with the logic of its principle.' In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2nd Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973). | 3 | 1999–2003 |
International Wire v. Local 38, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers
green
2 sentences2003To the contrary, ... the privilege stands in degrogation of the public’s ‘right to every man’s evidence,’ 8 Wigmore (McNaughton rev. ed.1961) s 2192 at 70, and as ‘an obstacle to the investigation of the truth,’ Id., s 2291 at 554; thus, as Wigmore has said, ‘It ought to be strictly confined within the narrowest possible limits consistent with the logic of its principle.’ In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2nd Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973). 2003To the contrary, ... the privilege stands in degrogation of the public's `right to every man's evidence,' 8 Wigmore (McNaughton rev. ed.1961) s 2192 at 70, and as `an obstacle to the investigation of the truth,' Id., s 2291 at 554; thus, as Wigmore has said, `It ought to be strictly confined within the narrowest possible limits consistent with the logic of its principle.' In re Horowitz, 482 F.2d 72, 81 (2nd Cir.1973), cert. denied, 414 U.S. 867 , 94 S.Ct. 64 , 38 L.Ed.2d 86 (1973). | 3 | 1999–2003 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.