logic principle (Kentucky) · Go Syfert
← Kentucky issues

logic principle in Kentucky

6 Kentucky opinions name it 3 courts 1970–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kentucky courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (2)

CaseFollowedCited
Futrell v. Shadoangreen
ky · 1992 · cited in 2 Kentucky opinions naming this issue, 1999–1999
2 sentences

1999As “[t]he privilege of the [attorney-client] relationship is an obstacle to the fact finding process and is to be strictly confined within the narrowest possible limits consistent with the logic of its principle^]” see Futrell v. Shadoan, Ky., 828 S.W.2d 649, 651 (1992), we conclude that the trial court erred in denying Shirley the right to depose the attorneys for Standard.

1999As "[t]he privilege of the [attorney-client] relationship is an obstacle to the fact finding process and is to be strictly confined within the narrowest possible limits consistent with the logic of its principle[,]" see Futrell v. Shadoan, Ky., 828 S.W.2d 649, 651 (1992), we conclude that the trial court *361 erred in denying Shirley the right to depose the attorneys for Standard.

22
Neidlinger v. Neidlingergreen
ky · 2001 · cited in 1 Kentucky opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
1 sentence

2016The logic of this principle applies as well to fees awarded only to the client under KRS 403.220.” 52 S.W.3d at 519 (emphasis added).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kentucky. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (8)

CaseCitedYears
United States v. Harvey M. Renville green
ca8 · 1985
2 sentences

2010Edwards and Renville Edwards, id. at 844, was premised on United States v. Renville, 779 F.2d 430 (8th Cir.1985), wherein the logic of the rule as applied to young children was explained, to wit: Statements by a child abuse victim to a physician during an examination that the abuser is a member of the victim's immediate household are reasonably pertinent to treatment.

2010Edwards and Renville Edwards, id. at 844, was premised on United States v. Renville, 779 F.2d 430 (8th Cir.1985), wherein the logic of the rule as applied to young children was explained, to wit: Statements by a child abuse victim to a physician during an examination that the abuser is a member of the victim’s immediate household are reasonably pertinent to treatment.

12010–2010
Wilhelm v. Wilhelm green
kyctapphigh · 1973
2 sentences

2001To the extent that Wilhelm v. Wilhelm, supra , holds otherwise, it is overruled.

2001To the extent that Wilhelm v. Wilhelm, supra, holds otherwise, it is overruled.

12001–2001
United States v. Pape green
ca2 · 1944
1 sentence

1970United States v. Pape (C.A.2 1944), 144 F.2d 778 , *541 782, cert. den 323 U.S. 752 , 65 S.Ct. 86 , 89 L.Ed. 602 (1944); Behrens v. Hironimus (C.A.4 1948), 170 F.2d 627, 628 ; Colton v. United States (C.A.2 1962), 306 F.2d 633, 637 ; NLRB v. Harvey (C.A.4 1965), 349 F.2d 900 , 16 A.L.R.3d 1035 .

11970–1970
Behrens v. Hironimus green
ca4 · 1948
1 sentence

1970United States v. Pape (C.A.2 1944), 144 F.2d 778 , *541 782, cert. den 323 U.S. 752 , 65 S.Ct. 86 , 89 L.Ed. 602 (1944); Behrens v. Hironimus (C.A.4 1948), 170 F.2d 627, 628 ; Colton v. United States (C.A.2 1962), 306 F.2d 633, 637 ; NLRB v. Harvey (C.A.4 1965), 349 F.2d 900 , 16 A.L.R.3d 1035 .

11970–1970
Edward E. Colton and Lillian Kaltman v. United States of America, United States of America v. Edward E. Colton green
ca2 · 1962
1 sentence

1970United States v. Pape (C.A.2 1944), 144 F.2d 778 , *541 782, cert. den 323 U.S. 752 , 65 S.Ct. 86 , 89 L.Ed. 602 (1944); Behrens v. Hironimus (C.A.4 1948), 170 F.2d 627, 628 ; Colton v. United States (C.A.2 1962), 306 F.2d 633, 637 ; NLRB v. Harvey (C.A.4 1965), 349 F.2d 900 , 16 A.L.R.3d 1035 .

11970–1970
National Labor Relations Board v. E. Bruce Harvey green
ca4 · 1965
1 sentence

1970United States v. Pape (C.A.2 1944), 144 F.2d 778 , *541 782, cert. den 323 U.S. 752 , 65 S.Ct. 86 , 89 L.Ed. 602 (1944); Behrens v. Hironimus (C.A.4 1948), 170 F.2d 627, 628 ; Colton v. United States (C.A.2 1962), 306 F.2d 633, 637 ; NLRB v. Harvey (C.A.4 1965), 349 F.2d 900 , 16 A.L.R.3d 1035 .

11970–1970
Loftin v. Deal green
scotus · 1944
1 sentence

1970United States v. Pape (C.A.2 1944), 144 F.2d 778 , *541 782, cert. den 323 U.S. 752 , 65 S.Ct. 86 , 89 L.Ed. 602 (1944); Behrens v. Hironimus (C.A.4 1948), 170 F.2d 627, 628 ; Colton v. United States (C.A.2 1962), 306 F.2d 633, 637 ; NLRB v. Harvey (C.A.4 1965), 349 F.2d 900 , 16 A.L.R.3d 1035 .

11970–1970
Personal Finance Co. v. Hadden green
scotus · 1944
1 sentence

1970United States v. Pape (C.A.2 1944), 144 F.2d 778 , *541 782, cert. den 323 U.S. 752 , 65 S.Ct. 86 , 89 L.Ed. 602 (1944); Behrens v. Hironimus (C.A.4 1948), 170 F.2d 627, 628 ; Colton v. United States (C.A.2 1962), 306 F.2d 633, 637 ; NLRB v. Harvey (C.A.4 1965), 349 F.2d 900 , 16 A.L.R.3d 1035 .

11970–1970

Where else courts name it

CA 28 (1918–2025) NY 18 (1921–2023) IL 18 (1948–2025) NC 17 (1972–2022) MI 15 (1916–2018) WA 12 (1947–2020) WI 11 (1888–2025) TX 11 (1985–2026) PA 10 (1947–2025) MO 8 (1884–1986) MA 8 (1998–2024) FL 8 (1964–2018) DC 7 (1977–2025) KY 6 (1970–2016) AL 6 (1973–2012) MS 5 (1999–2003) IN 5 (1894–1992) GA 5 (1940–2013) CT 5 (1990–2017) NJ 5 (1954–2005) ND 4 (1985–2011) UT 4 (1990–2015) OH 3 (2002–2017) TN 3 (1943–2017) LA 3 (1986–1992) MD 3 (1974–1978) DE 3 (1990–2017) SC 3 (2000–2013) KS 2 (1972–2000) ID 2 (1984–2006) VA 2 (1974–2001) MT 2 (1987–2023) VT 2 (1960–1998) ME 2 (1979–2015) IA 2 (1937–2026) OR 2 (1987–1993)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check