Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Washington opinions name it 1 courts 1973–2002 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Reynolds v. Simsgreen1 sentence1983In Dunn v. Blumstein, supra, the Court found that the denial of the franchise, "a fundamental political right," Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 562 (1964), was a penalty requiring application of the compelling-state-interest test. | 1 | 1 |
Vaughan v. Bowergreen1 sentence1973See also Vaughan v. Bower, 313 F. Supp. 37 (D. | 1 | 1 |
Williams v. Rhodesgreen2 sentences1973See, e.g., Williams v. Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23 , 21 L. 1973See, e.g., Williams v. Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23 , 21 L. | 1 | 1 |
Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.green2 sentences1973Ed. 2d 583 , 93 S. Ct. 1764 (1973) as follows: 4 Moreover, since sex, like race and national origin, is an immutable characteristic determined solely by the accident of birth, the imposition of special disabilities upon the members of a particular sex because of their sex would seem to violate “the basic concept of our system that legal burdens should bear some relationship to individual responsibility . . . .” Weber v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 406 U. S. 164, 175 (1972). 1973Perhaps the clearest pronouncement of the fundamental criterion of the compelling state interest test was that recently stated in Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677, 686 , 36 L.Ed.2d 583 , 93 S.Ct. 1764 (1973) as follows: [4] Moreover, since sex, like race and national origin, is an immutable characteristic determined solely by the accident of birth, the imposition of special disabilities upon the members of a particular sex because of their sex would seem to violate "the basic concept of our system that legal burdens should bear some relationship to individual responsibility ...." Weber v. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hudlow
green
2 sentences2002In so doing, we limit the compelling-state-interest test from State v. Hudlow to the circumstances for which it was crafted: prevention of the introduction of prejudicial evidence at trial. 99 Wn.2d 1 , 659 P.2d 514 (1983). 2002In so doing, we limit the compelling-state-interest test from State v. Hudlow to the circumstances for which it was crafted: prevention of the introduction of prejudicial evidence at trial. 99 Wn.2d 1 , 659 P.2d 514 (1983). | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Dunn v. Blumstein
green
1 sentence1983In Dunn v. Blumstein, supra, the Court found that the denial of the franchise, "a fundamental political right," Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U. S. 533, 562 (1964), was a penalty requiring application of the compelling-state-interest test. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Levy v. Louisiana Ex Rel. Charity Hospital
green
2 sentences1973See, e.g., Williams v. *521 Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23 , 21 L.Ed.2d 24 , 89 S.Ct. 5 (1968); Levy v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 68 , 20 L.Ed.2d 436 , 88 S.Ct. 1509 (1968). 1973See, e.g., Williams v. *521 Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23 , 21 L.Ed.2d 24 , 89 S.Ct. 5 (1968); Levy v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 68 , 20 L.Ed.2d 436 , 88 S.Ct. 1509 (1968). | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections
green
2 sentences1973Ed. 2d 169 , 86 S. Ct. 1079 (1966) has constituted one of the primary bases for application of the compelling state interest test. 1973It is further demonstrated by examination of numerous opinions of the court which inextricably connect "close scrutiny" by the judiciary only with the requirement that necessary and compelling state interests be shown, rather than merely "legitimate state objectives". [2] Additionally, Harper v. Virginia Bd. of Elections, 383 U.S. 663 , 16 L.Ed.2d 169 , 86 S.Ct. 1079 (1966) has constituted one of the primary bases for application of the compelling state interest test. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Bullock v. Carter
green
2 sentences1973As a result of confusion generated by inadequate analysis, Bullock v. Carter, 405 U.S 134, 31 L. 1973The majority also attempts to distinguish Bullock v. Carter, 405 U.S. 134 , 31 L. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Frontiero v. Richardson
green
2 sentences1973Perhaps the clearest pronouncement of the fundamental criterion of the compelling state interest test was that recently stated in Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677, 686 , 36 L. 1973Perhaps the clearest pronouncement of the fundamental criterion of the compelling state interest test was that recently stated in Frontiero v. Richardson, 411 U.S. 677, 686 , 36 L. | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.