Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1991–2026 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. Allenred2 sentences1995External factors include "showing that the factual or legal basis for a claim was not reasonably available to counsel, see Reed v Ross, 468 US [1, 16; 104 S Ct 2901 ; 82 L Ed 2d 1 (1984)], or that 'some interference by officials,’ Brown v Allen, 344 US 443, 486 [ 73 S Ct 397 ; 97 L Ed 469 ] (1953), made compliance impracticable . . . 1995External factors include "showing that the factual or legal basis for a claim was not reasonably available to counsel, see Reed v Ross, 468 US [1, 16; 104 S Ct 2901 ; 82 L Ed 2d 1 (1984)], or that 'some interference by officials,’ Brown v Allen, 344 US 443, 486 [ 73 S Ct 397 ; 97 L Ed 469 ] (1953), made compliance impracticable . . . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
People v. Reed
green
2 sentences2026External factors include “ ‘showing that the factual or legal basis for a claim was not reasonably available to counsel . . . .’ ” Id. at 385 n 8, quoting Murray v Carrier, 477 US 478, 488 ; 106 S Ct 2639 ; 91 L Ed 2d 397 (1986). 2026External factors include “ ‘showing that the factual or legal basis for a claim was not reasonably available to counsel . . . .’ ” Id. at 385 n 8, quoting Murray v Carrier, 477 US 478, 488 ; 106 S Ct 2639 ; 91 L Ed 2d 397 (1986). | 4 | 2019–2026 |
Murray v. Carrier
green
2 sentences2026External factors include “ ‘showing that the factual or legal basis for a claim was not reasonably available to counsel . . . .’ ” Id. at 385 n 8, quoting Murray v Carrier, 477 US 478, 488 ; 106 S Ct 2639 ; 91 L Ed 2d 397 (1986). 2026External factors include “ ‘showing that the factual or legal basis for a claim was not reasonably available to counsel . . . .’ ” Id. at 385 n 8, quoting Murray v Carrier, 477 US 478, 488 ; 106 S Ct 2639 ; 91 L Ed 2d 397 (1986). | 3 | 1995–2026 |
Reed v. Ross
green
2 sentences1995External factors include "showing that the factual or legal basis for a claim was not reasonably available to counsel, see Reed v Ross, 468 US [1, 16; 104 S Ct 2901 ; 82 L Ed 2d 1 (1984)], or that 'some interference by officials,’ Brown v Allen, 344 US 443, 486 [ 73 S Ct 397 ; 97 L Ed 469 ] (1953), made compliance impracticable . . . 1995External factors include "showing that the factual or legal basis for a claim was not reasonably available to counsel, see Reed v Ross, 468 US [1, 16; 104 S Ct 2901 ; 82 L Ed 2d 1 (1984)], or that 'some interference by officials,’ Brown v Allen, 344 US 443, 486 [ 73 S Ct 397 ; 97 L Ed 469 ] (1953), made compliance impracticable . . . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Miranda v. Arizona
green
2 sentences1995The uncertain dimensions of any exception for "inadvertence" or "ignorance" furnish an additional reason for rejecting it. [ Murray, supra at 487-488 .] [7] Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 ; 86 S Ct 1602 ; 16 L Ed 2d 694 (1966). [8] External factors include "showing that the factual or legal basis for a claim was not reasonably available to counsel, see Reed v Ross , 468 US [1, 16; 104 S Ct 2901 ; 82 L Ed 2d 1 (1984)], or that `some interference by officials,' Brown v Allen, 344 US 443, 486 [ 73 S Ct 397 ; 97 L Ed 469 ] (1953), made compliance impracticable...." Murray, supra at 488 . [9] If rea 1995The uncertain dimensions of any exception for "inadvertence" or "ignorance" furnish an additional reason for rejecting it. [ Murray, supra at 487-488 .] [7] Miranda v Arizona, 384 US 436 ; 86 S Ct 1602 ; 16 L Ed 2d 694 (1966). [8] External factors include "showing that the factual or legal basis for a claim was not reasonably available to counsel, see Reed v Ross , 468 US [1, 16; 104 S Ct 2901 ; 82 L Ed 2d 1 (1984)], or that `some interference by officials,' Brown v Allen, 344 US 443, 486 [ 73 S Ct 397 ; 97 L Ed 469 ] (1953), made compliance impracticable...." Murray, supra at 488 . [9] If rea | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Browne & Co. v. John P. Sharkey Co.
neutral
2 sentences1991Thus, even in employment contracts where courts have been much more reluctant to cure indefiniteness in duration, if the amount of work to be done is definite, a term that it must be done within a reasonable time will be supplied and enforced, Browne & Co v Sharkey Co, 58 Or 480 ; 115 P 156 (1911), as would a reference to a measurable time period such as, " 'as long as’ John Engler is Governor, or Michael F. Cavanagh is Chief Justice,” Levin, J., post, p 700, which clearly refers to an external standard of durational measure. 1991Thus, even in employment contracts where courts have been much more reluctant to cure indefiniteness in duration, if the amount of work to be done is definite, a term that it must be done within a reasonable time will be supplied and enforced, Browne & Co v Sharkey Co, 58 Or 480 ; 115 P 156 (1911), as would a reference to a measurable time period such as, " 'as long as’ John Engler is Governor, or Michael F. Cavanagh is Chief Justice,” Levin, J., post, p 700, which clearly refers to an external standard of durational measure. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.