Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1969–2008 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Fiber Industries, Inc. v. Coronet Industries, Inc.green1 sentence1984See also Fiber Industries *742 v. Coronet Industries, 59 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
Chittick v. Chittickgreen2 sentences1969See also Chittick v. Chittick, 332 Mass. 554 , 126 N.E. 2d 495 . 1969See also Chittick v. Chittick, 332 Mass. 554 , 126 N.E. 2d 495 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Highway Equipment Company v. Caterpillar Inc.
green
1 sentence2008For example, in Highway Equipment Co. v. Caterpillar, Inc., 908 F.2d 60 (6th Cir. 1990), an Ohio plaintiff sued an Illinois defendant for breach of contract and violation of the Illinois Franchise Disclosure Act (IFDA). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Schilb v. Kuebel
green
2 sentences2004Schilb v. Kuebel, 404 U.S. at 370-71 , 30 L. 2004Schilb v. Kuebel, 404 U.S. at 370-71 , 30 L. | 1 | 2004–2004 |
People v. Baxtrom
green
1 sentence1979App. 3d 546 , 378 N.E. 2d 182 (1978) (Illinois’ rule that prejudice will be presumed where record shows defense counsel involved in actual or potential conflict of interest because of duty to former client). | 1 | 1979–1979 |
Ralph A. Varone v. Alice E. Varone
green
2 sentences1969Neither want of jurisdiction, defect of procedure, or any other ground of invalidity can be availed of collaterally, by the party who is responsible for the existence of the judgment.” In the case of Varone v. Varone, 359 F. 2d 769 (7th Cir. 1966) the court in quoting the Illinois rule said: “ ‘The rule may now be taken as established that the constitutional requirement of full faith and credit bars either party to a divorce from collaterally attacking the decree on jurisdictional grounds in the courts of a sister state, where the defendant participated in the divorce proceedings and was accor 1969Neither want of jurisdiction, defect of procedure, or any other ground of invalidity can be availed of collaterally, by the party who is responsible for the existence of the judgment.” In the case of Varone v. Varone, 359 F. 2d 769 (7th Cir. 1966) the court in quoting the Illinois rule said: “ ‘The rule may now be taken as established that the constitutional requirement of full faith and credit bars either party to a divorce from collaterally attacking the decree on jurisdictional grounds in the courts of a sister state, where the defendant participated in the divorce proceedings and was accor | 1 | 1969–1969 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.