Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
6 Oklahoma opinions name it 2 courts 1909–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oklahoma courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.yellow2 sentences2020See United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n , 322 U.S. 533 , 64 S.Ct. 1162 , 88 L.Ed. 1440 (1944). 2020See United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Ass'n , 322 U.S. 533 , 64 S.Ct. 1162 , 88 L.Ed. 1440 (1944). | 1 | 1 |
Gastineau v. Stategreen1 sentence1912See Roy Gastineau v. State, 7 Okla. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oklahoma. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Summit Health, Ltd. v. Pinhas
green
2 sentences2006For the reasons set out below, we are not persuaded by the other cases relied upon by the nursing home. 132 Summit Health Ltd. addressed the question as to "whether the interstate commerce requirement of antitrust jurisdiction is satisfied by allegations that petitioners conspired to exelude respondent, a duly licensed and practicing physician and surgeon, from the market for ophthalmological services in Los Angeles because he refused to follow an unnecessarily costly surgical procedure." 500 U.S. at 324 , 111 S.Ct. at 1844 . 2006For the reasons set out below, we are not persuaded by the other cases relied upon by the nursing home. 132 Summit Health Ltd. addressed the question as to "whether the interstate commerce requirement of antitrust jurisdiction is satisfied by allegations that petitioners conspired to exelude respondent, a duly licensed and practicing physician and surgeon, from the market for ophthalmological services in Los Angeles because he refused to follow an unnecessarily costly surgical procedure." 500 U.S. at 324 , 111 S.Ct. at 1844 . | 1 | 2006–2006 |
Foster-Fountain Packing Co. v. Haydel
green
2 sentences1977Nothing contained herein shall prohibit sale and shipment of minnows raised in a regularly licensed commercial minnow hatchery.” The defendant argues that § 4-115B prohibits the export out of Oklahoma of minnows and that such state action is condemned by the United States Supreme Court in Foster-Fountain Packing Co. v. Haydel, 278 U.S. 1 , 49 S.Ct. 1 , 73 L.Ed. 147 (1928), as a violation of the interstate commerce clause. 1977Nothing contained herein shall prohibit sale and shipment of minnows raised in a regularly licensed commercial minnow hatchery.” The defendant argues that § 4-115B prohibits the export out of Oklahoma of minnows and that such state action is condemned by the United States Supreme Court in Foster-Fountain Packing Co. v. Haydel, 278 U.S. 1 , 49 S.Ct. 1 , 73 L.Ed. 147 (1928), as a violation of the interstate commerce clause. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Commissioner v. Fisher
neutral
1 sentence1953The principles stated in the two Davis cases, supra, would govern intrastate commerce as distinguished from interstate. 2 The case of Nippert v. City of Richmond, 327 U.S. 416 , 66 S. Ct. 686 , 90 L. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
Nippert v. City of Richmond
green
2 sentences1953The principles stated in the two Davis cases, supra, would govern intrastate commerce as distinguished from interstate. 2 The case of Nippert v. City of Richmond, 327 U.S. 416 , 66 S. Ct. 686 , 90 L. 1953The principles stated in the two Davis cases, supra, would govern intrastate commerce as distinguished from interstate. 2 The case of Nippert v. City of Richmond, 327 U.S. 416 , 66 S. Ct. 686 , 90 L. | 1 | 1953–1953 |
High v. State
neutral
1 sentence1909This view is sustained by this court in an opinion written by Associate Judge Doyle, in „the case of Webb High, Curley Bradley, Harry Whittemore, and George Broughton v. State of Oklahoma (decided at this term of court,) ante, p. 161, 101 Pac. 115 , which decision is referred to and approved. | 1 | 1909–1909 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.