must consider factors (Iowa) · Go Syfert
← Iowa issues

must consider factors in Iowa

5 Iowa opinions name it 1 courts 2018–2024 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
In Re the Marriage of Schrinergreen
iowa · 2005 · cited in 2 Iowa opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
2 sentences

2018The 5 trial court has considerable latitude in making this determination, and we only reverse if “there has been a failure to do equity.” See In re Marriage of Schriner, 695 N.W.2d 493, 496 (Iowa 2005).

2018The trial court has considerable latitude in making this determination, and we only reverse if “there has been a failure to do equity.” See In re Marriage of Schriner, 695 N.W.2d 493, 496 (Iowa 2005).

22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (3)

CaseCitedYears
Ron Fortune v. State of Iowa green
iowa · 2021
1 sentence

2024Id.

12024–2024
In Re P.L. green
iowa · 2010
1 sentence

2020Second, a court must consider the factors presented in section 232.116(2), giving “primary consideration to the child’s safety, to the best placement for furthering the long-term nurturing and growth of the child, and to the physical, mental, and 6 emotional condition and needs of the child.” Iowa Code § 232.116 (2); P.L., 778 N.W.2d at 40 .

12020–2020
In Re the Marriage of Melissa Jo Mihm and Scott Anthony Mihm, Upon the Petition of Melissa Jo Mihm N/K/A Melissa Jo Weber green
iowa · 2014
1 sentence

2020To determine whether a substantial change in circumstances has occurred over the child-support obligation, the court must consider factors, including “changes in a party’s employment or income.” Mihm, 842 N.W.2d at 381 .

12020–2020

Where else courts name it

NY 71 (1991–2026) OH 67 (1990–2025) IL 50 (1983–2026) CT 49 (1990–2018) AL 45 (1992–2025) CA 28 (1970–2025) TN 22 (1997–2026) TX 20 (1981–2025) PA 18 (2005–2023) CO 17 (1962–2025) NJ 16 (1985–2026) VA 14 (1998–2025) KS 13 (1992–2024) OR 12 (2005–2025) MO 9 (1992–2003) LA 8 (1972–2021) WA 8 (2010–2023) FL 8 (1995–2011) ME 7 (1994–2019) ND 6 (1982–2024) MN 6 (1984–1987) IA 5 (2018–2024) VT 5 (1998–2026) MD 5 (1995–2025) DE 5 (1995–2026) WI 5 (1987–2025) MI 5 (1951–2022) ID 5 (2001–2024) MT 4 (2005–2024) GA 4 (2019–2020) NC 4 (1980–2025) AZ 4 (2009–2024) MA 4 (1997–2020) UT 3 (1995–2023) IN 3 (1992–2020) WV 3 (2010–2016) NM 3 (2023–2025) NV 2 (1999–2015) HI 2 (2019–2024) DC 2 (2009–2009) SD 2 (1980–1989)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check