Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1951–1991 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Davis v. Gamblegreen1 sentence1991Cf. State v. Covington, 290 N.C. 313, 328-29 , 286 S.E.2d 629, 641 (1976); Zuniga, 320 N.C. at 257 , 357 S.E.2d at 914 . | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Perduegreen2 sentences1978“Ordinarily it is presumed that the jury followed such instruction and the admission [of evidence later struck from the record] is not held to be reversible error unless it is apparent from the entire record that the prejudicial effect of it was not removed from the minds of the jury by the court’s admonition.” Smith v. Perdue, 258 N.C. 686, 690 , 129 S.E. 2d 293, 297 (1963). 1978“Ordinarily it is presumed that the jury followed such instruction and the admission [of evidence later struck from the record] is not held to be reversible error unless it is apparent from the entire record that the prejudicial effect of it was not removed from the minds of the jury by the court’s admonition.” Smith v. Perdue, 258 N.C. 686, 690 , 129 S.E. 2d 293, 297 (1963). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Covington
green
1 sentence1991Cf. State v. Covington, 290 N.C. 313, 328-29 , 286 S.E.2d 629, 641 (1976); Zuniga, 320 N.C. at 257 , 357 S.E.2d at 914 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Zuniga
green
2 sentences1991Cf. State v. Covington, 290 N.C. 313, 328-29 , 286 S.E.2d 629, 641 (1976); Zuniga, 320 N.C. at 257 , 357 S.E.2d at 914 . 1991Cf. State v. Covington, 290 N.C. 313, 328-29 , 286 S.E.2d 629, 641 (1976); Zuniga, 320 N.C. at 257 , 357 S.E.2d at 914 . | 1 | 1991–1991 |
Apel v. Queen City Coach Company
green
2 sentences1974Apel v. Coach Co., 267 N.C. 25 , 147 S.E. 2d 566 (1966) ; 7 Strong’s North Carolina Index 2d, Trial § 16 (1968). 1974Apel v. Coach Co., 267 N.C. 25 , 147 S.E. 2d 566 (1966) ; 7 Strong’s North Carolina Index 2d, Trial § 16 (1968). | 1 | 1974–1974 |
State v. . Vicks
neutral
2 sentences1972State v. Vicks, 223 N.C. 384 , 26 S.E. 2d 873 (1943). 1972State v. Vicks, 223 N.C. 384 , 26 S.E. 2d 873 (1943). | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Ledford v. Valley River Lumber Co.
green
2 sentences1951J.), in Ledford v. Lumber Co., 183 N.C. 614 , 112 S.E. 421 . 1951J.), in Ledford v. Lumber Co., 183 N.C. 614 , 112 S.E. 421 . | 1 | 1951–1951 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.