gross error (Nebraska) · Go Syfert
← Nebraska issues

gross error in Nebraska

5 Nebraska opinions name it 2 courts 1903–2016 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

CaseFollowedCited
Holmes v. Crossroads Joint Venturegreen
neb · 2001 · cited in 1 Nebraska opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002
2 sentences

2002See, Holmes v. Crossroads Joint Venture, 262 Neb. 98 , 629 N.W.2d 511 (2001); Reiser v. Coburn, 255 Neb. 655 , 587 N.W.2d 336 (1998).

2002See, Holmes v. Crossroads Joint Venture, 262 Neb. 98 , 629 N.W.2d 511 (2001); Reiser v. Coburn, 255 Neb. 655 , 587 N.W.2d 336 (1998).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
Springer v. Bohling green
neb · 2002
1 sentence

2016Id.

12016–2016
Reiser v. Coburn green
neb · 1998
2 sentences

2002See, Holmes v. Crossroads Joint Venture, 262 Neb. 98 , 629 N.W.2d 511 (2001); Reiser v. Coburn, 255 Neb. 655 , 587 N.W.2d 336 (1998).

2002See, Holmes v. Crossroads Joint Venture, 262 Neb. 98 , 629 N.W.2d 511 (2001); Reiser v. Coburn, 255 Neb. 655 , 587 N.W.2d 336 (1998).

12002–2002
Blunt v. Little green
circtdma · 1822
2 sentences

2001See id., citing Blunt v. Little, 3 F. Cas. 760 (C.C.D.Mass.1822) (No. 1,578).

2001See id., citing Blunt v. Little, 3 F. Cas. 760 (C.C.D.

12001–2001
Frates v. Nichols green
fladistctapp · 1964
1 sentence

1995Schrempp and Salerno respond to Gross’ claim by relying upon Frates v. Nichols, 167 So. 2d 77 (Fla. App. 1964).

11995–1995
Smith v. Daub green
neb · 1985
2 sentences

1995In Smith v. Daub, 219 Neb. 698 , 365 N.W.2d 816 (1985), the law partnership of Daub, Stehlik & Smith dissolved.

1995In Smith v. Daub, 219 Neb. 698 , 365 N.W.2d 816 (1985), the law partnership of Daub, Stehlik & Smith dissolved.

11995–1995
Romberg v. Hughes neutral
neb · 1886
1 sentence

1903Spaulding v. State, 61 Neb. 289 ; Farley v. Peebles, 50 Neb. 723, 729 ; Nelson v. Becker, 32 Neb. 99 ; Romberg v. Hughes, 18 Neb. 579 .

11903–1903
Nelson v. Becker green
neb · 1891
1 sentence

1903Spaulding v. State, 61 Neb. 289 ; Farley v. Peebles, 50 Neb. 723, 729 ; Nelson v. Becker, 32 Neb. 99 ; Romberg v. Hughes, 18 Neb. 579 .

11903–1903
Farley v. Peebles neutral
neb · 1897
1 sentence

1903Spaulding v. State, 61 Neb. 289 ; Farley v. Peebles, 50 Neb. 723, 729 ; Nelson v. Becker, 32 Neb. 99 ; Romberg v. Hughes, 18 Neb. 579 .

11903–1903
Spaulding v. State neutral
neb · 1901
1 sentence

1903Spaulding v. State, 61 Neb. 289 ; Farley v. Peebles, 50 Neb. 723, 729 ; Nelson v. Becker, 32 Neb. 99 ; Romberg v. Hughes, 18 Neb. 579 .

11903–1903

Where else courts name it

CA 53 (1913–2026) IL 45 (1942–2025) NJ 32 (1937–2025) TX 22 (1867–2019) PA 19 (1923–2026) NY 17 (1874–2016) MI 14 (1863–2023) OH 14 (1908–2023) IN 14 (1874–2025) AK 11 (1978–2026) NC 11 (2006–2025) AL 10 (1923–2023) MD 8 (1908–2011) MT 5 (1896–2011) MN 5 (1897–1998) CO 5 (1896–2019) NE 5 (1903–2016) SD 4 (1980–2016) WI 4 (1938–2020) OR 4 (1974–2024) MO 3 (1879–2025) WY 3 (1988–2021) MA 3 (1960–2009) FL 3 (1939–2002) AZ 3 (1916–2013) TN 2 (1992–2020) ND 2 (1901–1983) DE 2 (1978–2005) LA 2 (1918–2023) AR 2 (1995–1997) GA 2 (1893–1905) WV 2 (1931–2009) VA 2 (1979–2019) ME 2 (1892–1970) VI 2 (1977–2026) CT 2 (1956–1997)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check