Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 1901–2026 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Oregon v. Ice
green
2 sentences2026Courts are guided by the “twin considerations” of “historical practice and respect for state sovereignty.” Oregon v. Ice, 555 US 160, 161 , 129 S Ct 711 , 172 L Ed 2d 517 (2009). 2026Courts are guided by the “twin considerations” of “historical practice and respect for state sovereignty.” Oregon v. Ice, 555 US 160, 161 , 129 S Ct 711 , 172 L Ed 2d 517 (2009). | 2 | 2026–2026 |
State v. Carlson
green
1 sentence2012Id. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
State v. Sawyer
green
2 sentences2008State v. Sawyer, 221 Or App 350, 354-55 , 190 P3d 409 (2008) (citing State v. James, 339 Or 476, 488 , 123 P3d 251 (2005)). 2008State v. Sawyer, 221 Or App 350, 354-55 , 190 P3d 409 (2008) (citing State v. James, 339 Or 476, 488 , 123 P3d 251 (2005)). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. James
green
2 sentences2008State v. Sawyer, 221 Or App 350, 354-55 , 190 P3d 409 (2008) (citing State v. James, 339 Or 476, 488 , 123 P3d 251 (2005)). 2008State v. Sawyer, 221 Or App 350, 354-55 , 190 P3d 409 (2008) (citing State v. James, 339 Or 476, 488 , 123 P3d 251 (2005)). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
White v. Whiting
neutral
1 sentence1901Again, in White v. Whiting, 8 Daly, 23 , it was held that, where an account has been stated between, two persons, embracing all the items of a particular transaction, but the debtor refuses to1 pay unless the creditor executes a release embracing other transactions as to1 which there is some dispute, the account is so far conclusive against the' debtor in an action to recover the balance as to cast upon him the burden of showing error or mistake therein. | 1 | 1901–1901 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.