Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
5 Oregon opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Spathas v. City of Portlandgreen2 sentences2009See, e.g., Spathas v. City of Portland, 133 Or App 275, 278 , 891 P2d 664 (1995) (the phrase “would have allowed when established” in a local government land use code operated to impose a temporal requirement). 2009See, e.g., Spathas v. City of Portland, 133 Or App 275, 278 , 891 P2d 664 (1995) (the phrase “would have allowed when established” in a local government land use code operated to impose a temporal requirement). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. R. L. M.
green
2 sentences2025L. M., 309 Or App 545, 550 , 482 P3d 201 (2021) (emphasis in original). 2025L. M., 309 Or App 545, 550 , 482 P3d 201 (2021) (emphasis in original). | 2 | 2025–2025 |
Comcast Corp. III v. Dept. of Rev. (TC 4909)
red
1 sentence2016Specifically, con- sidering the actual provisions in Oregon statutes, “ ‘new property or new improvements’ ” are those that “come into being between January 1 of the preceding assessment year * * * and January 1 of the current assessment year * * *.” Id. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Jaqua v. City of Springfield
green
2 sentences2009As we observed in Jaqua v. City of Springfield, 193 Or App 573, 593 , 91 P3d 817 (2004), “OAR 660-012-0060 serves to prevent local governments from engaging in land use decision-making without considering whether transportation systems can accommodate the proposed use.” 4 (Emphasis in original.) Thus, based on the plain text of the rule, the local government was required to make a determination regarding whether the zone change would significantly affect transportation facilities before approving the amendment. *37 Nonetheless, Goodpasture contends that a local government may “defer the [trans 2009As we observed in Jaqua v. City of Springfield, 193 Or App 573, 593 , 91 P3d 817 (2004), “OAR 660-012-0060 serves to prevent local governments from engaging in land use decision-making without considering whether transportation systems can accommodate the proposed use.” 4 (Emphasis in original.) Thus, based on the plain text of the rule, the local government was required to make a determination regarding whether the zone change would significantly affect transportation facilities before approving the amendment. *37 Nonetheless, Goodpasture contends that a local government may “defer the [trans | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Gould v. Deschutes County
green
2 sentences2009As we observed in Jaqua v. City of Springfield, 193 Or App 573, 593 , 91 P3d 817 (2004), “OAR 660-012-0060 serves to prevent local governments from engaging in land use decision-making without considering whether transportation systems can accommodate the proposed use.” 4 (Emphasis in original.) Thus, based on the plain text of the rule, the local government was required to make a determination regarding whether the zone change would significantly affect transportation facilities before approving the amendment. *37 Nonetheless, Goodpasture contends that a local government may “defer the [trans 2009As we observed in Jaqua v. City of Springfield, 193 Or App 573, 593 , 91 P3d 817 (2004), “OAR 660-012-0060 serves to prevent local governments from engaging in land use decision-making without considering whether transportation systems can accommodate the proposed use.” 4 (Emphasis in original.) Thus, based on the plain text of the rule, the local government was required to make a determination regarding whether the zone change would significantly affect transportation facilities before approving the amendment. *37 Nonetheless, Goodpasture contends that a local government may “defer the [trans | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Hamel v. Johnson
green
1 sentence2001The “statute does not impose a temporal requirement that the emotional disturbance exist at or near the time of the scheduled release date[.]” Id. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.