Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
31 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1990–2017 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Fowler v. Robertsgreen2 sentences2003Justice Watson also noted two principles: (1) that the discretionary function exception does not bar a negligence claim if the official had no room to exercise a policy judgment, and (2) that a government which acts negligently for reasons unrelated to public policy considerations is liable to those it injures. 556 So.2d at 15-16 . 1998In 1989, the Louisiana Supreme Court adopted the two prong test of Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531 , 108 S.Ct. 1954 , 100 L.Ed.2d 531 (1988), to determine "whether the discretionary function exception applies in specific fact situations." Fowler v. Roberts, 556 So.2d 1, 15 (La.1989). | 2 | 14 |
Arizona Maintenance Co. v. United Statesgreen2 sentences1993See Arizona Maintenance Co. v. United States, 864 F.2d 1497 (9th Cir.1989). 1990See Arizona Maintenance Co. v. United States, 864 F.2d 1497 (9th Cir.1989). | 2 | 2 |
Kniepp v. City of Shreveportgreen2 sentences2017Kniepp v. Shreveport, 609 So.2d 1163, 1166-1168 (La. 1995Fowler v. Roberts, 556 So.2d 1 (La.1989), Kniepp v. City of Shreveport, 609 So.2d 1163 (La.App.2d Cir.1992), writ denied, 613 So.2d 976 (La.1993). | 1 | 2 |
Rick v. STATE, DOTDgreen2 sentences1995See Rick v. State, DOTD, Nos. 93-1776 and 93-1784 (La. 1/14/94), 630 So.2d 1271, 1276 . [15] The trial court allocated 32% fault to Archon for his failure to see the train coming. 1995LSA-R.S. 9:2798.1; Rick v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, 93-1776 (La. 1/14/94), 630 So.2d 1271 ; Fowler v. Roberts, supra . | 1 | 2 |
Johnson v. Stategreen1 sentence1995See, e.g., Johnson v. State, 636 P.2d 47, 63 (Alaska 1981) (holding that "once the state made the decision to construct the road and crossing, the discretionary function immunity did not protect it from possible negligence liability in the operational carrying out of the basic policy-planning decision to build"); Harrison v. Escambia County School Board, 419 So.2d 640, 647 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982) (noting in dicta that where "additional signals were planned before, but installed after the accident, and the Department was charged with the responsibility for planning and maintaining the crossing," | 1 | 1 |
Harrison v. Escambia County School Bd.green1 sentence1995See, e.g., Johnson v. State, 636 P.2d 47, 63 (Alaska 1981) (holding that "once the state made the decision to construct the road and crossing, the discretionary function immunity did not protect it from possible negligence liability in the operational carrying out of the basic policy-planning decision to build"); Harrison v. Escambia County School Board, 419 So.2d 640, 647 (Fla.Dist.Ct.App.1982) (noting in dicta that where "additional signals were planned before, but installed after the accident, and the Department was charged with the responsibility for planning and maintaining the crossing," | 1 | 1 |
Insley v. Titan Ins. Co.green1 sentence1994See Insley v. Titan Insurance Company, 589 So.2d 10 (La.App. 1st Cir.1991); Chaney v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, 583 So.2d 926 (La.App. 1st Cir.1991); Verdun v. State Through the Department of Health and Human Resources, 559 So.2d 877 (La.App. 4th Cir.1990). *409 Generally, the jurisprudence construing LSA-R.S. 9:2798.1 applies the twostep analysis of Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531 , 108 S.Ct. 1954 , 100 L.Ed.2d 531 (1988), to determine whether the discretionary function exception applies in specific fact situations. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Berkovitz v. United States
green
2 sentences2017In Fowler, we applied the .two-step test enunciated in Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531 , 108 S.Ct. 1954 , 100 L.Ed.2d. 531 (1988) for determining whether the discretionary function exception applies in specific fact situations. 2017In Fowler, we applied the .two-step test enunciated in Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531 , 108 S.Ct. 1954 , 100 L.Ed.2d. 531 (1988) for determining whether the discretionary function exception applies in specific fact situations. | 16 | 1990–2017 |
Walter J. Mundy, Jr. v. United States
green
1 sentence2002Citing several federal appellate cases, it contends that the government's selection of a design or *12 approval of a design is a discretionary function to which immunity attaches. [13] As such, DOTD argues that it was entitled to share in the federal government's privilege of immunity established in 28 U.S.C. § 2680 . [14] Relying on Mundy v. United States, 983 F.2d 950 (9th Cir.Cal.1993), [15] DOTD asserts that the proper procedural vehicle to raise the government contract defense is to contest the trial court's subject matter jurisdiction to hear the case. [16] Jurisdiction is the legal powe | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Alpha Alpha, Inc. v. Southland Aviation
green
1 sentence1998Alpha Alpha, Inc. v. Southland Aviation, 96-928 (La.App. 3 Cir. 7/9/97) ; 697 So.2d 1364 , (citing, Archon v. Union Pac. | 1 | 1998–1998 |
Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp.
green
1 sentence1996The court in Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Cor., 92-1182 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/17/94) , 632 So.2d 375, 380 , writ granted, 94-0952 (La. 6/17/94), 638 So.2d 1075 , reversed on other grounds, 94-952 (La. 11/30/94), 646 So.2d 318 , stated: This discretionary function exception to governmental liability applies only when a policy judgment is made at the ministerial level, not at the operational level. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Corp.
green
1 sentence1996The court in Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Cor., 92-1182 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/17/94) , 632 So.2d 375, 380 , writ granted, 94-0952 (La. 6/17/94), 638 So.2d 1075 , reversed on other grounds, 94-952 (La. 11/30/94), 646 So.2d 318 , stated: This discretionary function exception to governmental liability applies only when a policy judgment is made at the ministerial level, not at the operational level. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. Peters
neutral
1 sentence1996The court in Mathieu v. Imperial Toy Cor., 92-1182 (La.App. 4 Cir. 3/17/94) , 632 So.2d 375, 380 , writ granted, 94-0952 (La. 6/17/94), 638 So.2d 1075 , reversed on other grounds, 94-952 (La. 11/30/94), 646 So.2d 318 , stated: This discretionary function exception to governmental liability applies only when a policy judgment is made at the ministerial level, not at the operational level. | 1 | 1996–1996 |
Kniepp v. City of Shreveport
neutral
1 sentence1995Fowler v. Roberts, 556 So.2d 1 (La.1989), Kniepp v. City of Shreveport, 609 So.2d 1163 (La.App.2d Cir.1992), writ denied, 613 So.2d 976 (La.1993). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Ayers v. Brazzell
green
1 sentence1995White v. State through the Dept. of Public Safety & Corrections, 93-2034 (La.App. 1st Cir. 10/7/94), 644 So.2d 684 ; Rick v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, supra ; Ayers v. Brazzell, 26,068 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/21/94), 648 So.2d 406 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
White v. STATE, DEPT. OF PUBLIC SAFETY & CORRECTIONS
neutral
1 sentence1995White v. State through the Dept. of Public Safety & Corrections, 93-2034 (La.App. 1st Cir. 10/7/94), 644 So.2d 684 ; Rick v. State, Department of Transportation and Development, supra ; Ayers v. Brazzell, 26,068 (La.App.2d Cir. 9/21/94), 648 So.2d 406 . | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Verdun v. STATE, DHHR
green
1 sentence1994See Insley v. Titan Insurance Company, 589 So.2d 10 (La.App. 1st Cir.1991); Chaney v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, 583 So.2d 926 (La.App. 1st Cir.1991); Verdun v. State Through the Department of Health and Human Resources, 559 So.2d 877 (La.App. 4th Cir.1990). *409 Generally, the jurisprudence construing LSA-R.S. 9:2798.1 applies the twostep analysis of Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531 , 108 S.Ct. 1954 , 100 L.Ed.2d 531 (1988), to determine whether the discretionary function exception applies in specific fact situations. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Chaney v. National RR Passenger Corp.
green
1 sentence1994See Insley v. Titan Insurance Company, 589 So.2d 10 (La.App. 1st Cir.1991); Chaney v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation, 583 So.2d 926 (La.App. 1st Cir.1991); Verdun v. State Through the Department of Health and Human Resources, 559 So.2d 877 (La.App. 4th Cir.1990). *409 Generally, the jurisprudence construing LSA-R.S. 9:2798.1 applies the twostep analysis of Berkovitz v. United States, 486 U.S. 531 , 108 S.Ct. 1954 , 100 L.Ed.2d 531 (1988), to determine whether the discretionary function exception applies in specific fact situations. | 1 | 1994–1994 |
cluster 517439
green
1 sentence1992Trevino v. General Dynamics Corporation, 865 F.2d 1474 (5th Cir.1989). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Indian Towing Co. v. United States
green
2 sentences1990Professor Davis discusses several important decisions from which he draws his conclusions as to the underlying theory of the discretionary function exception to governmental liability: Indian Towing Co. v. United States, 350 U.S. 61 , 76 S.Ct. 122 , 100 L.Ed. 48 (1955); Dalehite v. United States, 346 U.S. 15 , 73 S.Ct. 956 , 97 L.Ed. 1427 (1953); Beins v. United States, 695 F.2d 591 (D.C.Cir.1982); Payton v. United States, 679 F.2d 475 (5th Cir.1982); Blessing v. United States, 447 F.Supp. 1160 (E.D.Pa.1978). 1990Professor Davis discusses several important decisions from which he draws his conclusions as to the underlying theory of the discretionary function exception to governmental liability: Indian Towing Co. v. United States, 350 U.S. 61 , 76 S.Ct. 122 , 100 L.Ed. 48 (1955); Dalehite v. United States, 346 U.S. 15 , 73 S.Ct. 956 , 97 L.Ed. 1427 (1953); Beins v. United States, 695 F.2d 591 (D.C.Cir.1982); Payton v. United States, 679 F.2d 475 (5th Cir.1982); Blessing v. United States, 447 F.Supp. 1160 (E.D.Pa.1978). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Dalehite v. United States
green
2 sentences1990Professor Davis discusses several important decisions from which he draws his conclusions as to the underlying theory of the discretionary function exception to governmental liability: Indian Towing Co. v. United States, 350 U.S. 61 , 76 S.Ct. 122 , 100 L.Ed. 48 (1955); Dalehite v. United States, 346 U.S. 15 , 73 S.Ct. 956 , 97 L.Ed. 1427 (1953); Beins v. United States, 695 F.2d 591 (D.C.Cir.1982); Payton v. United States, 679 F.2d 475 (5th Cir.1982); Blessing v. United States, 447 F.Supp. 1160 (E.D.Pa.1978). 1990Professor Davis discusses several important decisions from which he draws his conclusions as to the underlying theory of the discretionary function exception to governmental liability: Indian Towing Co. v. United States, 350 U.S. 61 , 76 S.Ct. 122 , 100 L.Ed. 48 (1955); Dalehite v. United States, 346 U.S. 15 , 73 S.Ct. 956 , 97 L.Ed. 1427 (1953); Beins v. United States, 695 F.2d 591 (D.C.Cir.1982); Payton v. United States, 679 F.2d 475 (5th Cir.1982); Blessing v. United States, 447 F.Supp. 1160 (E.D.Pa.1978). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Douglas Glynn Payton, Administrator of the Estate of Sheryl Lynn Payton, Deceased v. The United States of America
green
1 sentence1990Professor Davis discusses several important decisions from which he draws his conclusions as to the underlying theory of the discretionary function exception to governmental liability: Indian Towing Co. v. United States, 350 U.S. 61 , 76 S.Ct. 122 , 100 L.Ed. 48 (1955); Dalehite v. United States, 346 U.S. 15 , 73 S.Ct. 956 , 97 L.Ed. 1427 (1953); Beins v. United States, 695 F.2d 591 (D.C.Cir.1982); Payton v. United States, 679 F.2d 475 (5th Cir.1982); Blessing v. United States, 447 F.Supp. 1160 (E.D.Pa.1978). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
D. Ross Beins v. United States
green
1 sentence1990Professor Davis discusses several important decisions from which he draws his conclusions as to the underlying theory of the discretionary function exception to governmental liability: Indian Towing Co. v. United States, 350 U.S. 61 , 76 S.Ct. 122 , 100 L.Ed. 48 (1955); Dalehite v. United States, 346 U.S. 15 , 73 S.Ct. 956 , 97 L.Ed. 1427 (1953); Beins v. United States, 695 F.2d 591 (D.C.Cir.1982); Payton v. United States, 679 F.2d 475 (5th Cir.1982); Blessing v. United States, 447 F.Supp. 1160 (E.D.Pa.1978). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
cluster 430903
green
1 sentence1990Id. at 1063-64 . * * * * * * The United States complains that the district court erred by applying the discretionary function analysis in a rigidly chronological fashion. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Isie D. Wysinger v. United States
green
1 sentence1990In Wysinger v. United States, 784 F.2d 1252 (5th Cir. 1986), we stated that discretionary function is to be broadly interpreted. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Blessing v. United States
green
1 sentence1990Professor Davis discusses several important decisions from which he draws his conclusions as to the underlying theory of the discretionary function exception to governmental liability: Indian Towing Co. v. United States, 350 U.S. 61 , 76 S.Ct. 122 , 100 L.Ed. 48 (1955); Dalehite v. United States, 346 U.S. 15 , 73 S.Ct. 956 , 97 L.Ed. 1427 (1953); Beins v. United States, 695 F.2d 591 (D.C.Cir.1982); Payton v. United States, 679 F.2d 475 (5th Cir.1982); Blessing v. United States, 447 F.Supp. 1160 (E.D.Pa.1978). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.