two prong test in Indiana

30 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1980–2023 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

Case	Followed	Cited
Bieghler v. Stategreen ind · 1997 · cited in 5 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2013–2014 2 sentences 2014Bieghler v. State, 690 N.E.2d 188, 192 (Ind. 1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1021 (1998). 2013Bieghler v. State, 690 N.E.2d 188, 192 (Ind. 1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1021 (1998).	5	5
State v. Mooregreen ind · 1997 · cited in 5 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2000–2002 2 sentences 2002State v. Moore, 678 N.E.2d 1258, 1261 (Ind.1997). 2002State v. Moore, 678 N.E.2d 1258, 1261 (Ind.1997).	5	5
Strickland v. Washingtongreen scotus · 1984 · cited in 15 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2000–2023 2 sentences 2023Ineffective Assistance of Counsel A. Standard of Review [21] When reviewing claims of ineffective assistance of counsel, we apply the two- prong test established in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984). 2018We review claims of ineffective assistance of counsel under the two- prong test set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984).	2	15
Wages v. Stategreen indctapp · 2007 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019 2 sentences 2019Wages v. State, 863 N.E.2d 408, 410 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007), reh’g denied, trans. denied. 2019Wages v. State, 863 N.E.2d 408, 410 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007), reh’g denied, trans. denied.	2	2
Udarbe v. Stategreen indctapp · 2001 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019 2 sentences 2019Udarbe v. State, 749 N.E.2d 562, 564 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001). [13] In examining the admissibility of Rule 404(b) evidence, courts apply a two- prong analysis. 2019Udarbe v. State, 749 N.E.2d 562, 564 (Ind. Ct. App. 2001). [13] In examining the admissibility of Rule 404(b) evidence, courts apply a two- prong analysis.	2	2
Collins v. Daygreen ind · 1994 · cited in 2 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2001–2003 2 sentences 2003In determining whether a statute complies with or violates this provision, we use the two prong test set out in Collins v. Day, 644 N.E.2d 72, 80 (Ind.1994). 2003In determining whether a statute complies with or violates this provision, we use the two prong test set out in Collins v. Day, 644 N.E.2d 72, 80 (Ind.1994).	1	2
State ex rel. Iacovone v. Kaminskigreen ohio · 1998 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 2013–2013 1 sentence 2013Bieghler v. State, 690 N.E.2d 4 188, 192 (Ind. 1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1021 (1998).	1	1
Lowery v. Stategreen ind · 1994 · cited in 1 Indiana opinions naming this issue, 1998–1998 1 sentence 1998See Lowery, 640 N.E.2d at 1048 .	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (11)

Case	Cited	Years
Lockhart v. United States green scotus · 1998 2 sentences 2014Bieghler v. State, 690 N.E.2d 188, 192 (Ind. 1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1021 (1998). 2013Bieghler v. State, 690 N.E.2d 4 188, 192 (Ind. 1997), cert. denied, 525 U.S. 1021 (1998).	6	2013–2014
Fair v. State green ind · 1993 2 sentences 2012To demonstrate that the community caretaking function justified impoundment of Berry’s vehicle, the State must satisfy a two prong test under Fair: (1) that the officer’s belief that the vehicle posed a harm or a threat to the community was “consistent with standards of sound policing and (2) that the decision to combat that threat by impoundment was in keeping with established departmental routine or regulation.” Id. at 433 . 2012To demonstrate that the community caretak-ing function justified impoundment of Berry's vehicle, the State must satisfy a two prong test under Fair: (1) that the officer's belief that the vehicle posed a harm or a threat to the community was "consistent with standards of sound policing and (2) that the decision to combat that threat by impoundment was in keeping with established departmental routine or regulation." Id. at 483 .	2	2012–2012
New Jersey v. T. L. O. green scotus · 1985 2 sentences 2007The Court developed a two prong test for determining the reasonableness of a search: (1) whether the action was justified at its inception; and (2) whether the search "was reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place." Id. (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)). 2007The Court developed a two prong test for determining the reasonableness of a search: (1) whether the action was justified at its inception; and (2) whether the search “was reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place.” Id. (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)).	2	2007–2007
Terry v. Ohio green scotus · 1968 2 sentences 2007The Court developed a two prong test for determining the reasonableness of a search: (1) whether the action was justified at its inception; and (2) whether the search “was reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place.” Id. (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)). 2007The Court developed a two prong test for determining the reasonableness of a search: (1) whether the action was justified at its inception; and (2) whether the search “was reasonably related in scope to the circumstances which justified the interference in the first place.” Id. (quoting Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1, 20 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)).	2	2007–2007
United States v. Cronic green scotus · 1984 2 sentences 1999The case of United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 , 104 S.Ct. 2039 , 80 L.Ed.2d 657 (1984) provides a narrow exception to the traditional two prong analysis of Strickland generally used to determine whether assistance of counsel was effective. 1999The case of United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648 , 104 S.Ct. 2039 , 80 L.Ed.2d 657 (1984) provides a narrow exception to the traditional two prong analysis of Strickland generally used to determine whether assistance of counsel was effective.	2	1998–1999
Angelo Bobadilla v. State of Indiana green ind · 2019 1 sentence 2023Bobadilla v. State, 117 N.E.3d 1272, 1280 (Ind. 2019).	1	2023–2023
Katz v. United States green scotus · 1967 2 sentences 1985Id., 389 U.S. at 361 , 88 S.Ct. at 516 , 19 L.Ed.2d at 587 . 1985Id., 389 U.S. at 361 , 88 S.Ct. at 516 , 19 L.Ed.2d at 587 .	1	1985–1985
Richey v. State green ind · 1981 1 sentence 1985Hovis, supra; Miller, supra; Richey, supra. Al though both parties leap to a discussion of the second part of the test, we do not reach any consideration of the question of probative value, because the mug shots as introduced into evidence in this case are unduly prejudicial.	1	1985–1985
Hovis v. State green ind · 1983 1 sentence 1985Hovis, supra; Miller, supra; Richey, supra. Al though both parties leap to a discussion of the second part of the test, we do not reach any consideration of the question of probative value, because the mug shots as introduced into evidence in this case are unduly prejudicial.	1	1985–1985
Spinelli v. United States red scotus · 1969 2 sentences 1980We examine, therefore, the information contained in the tip to determine whether the two prong test established in Aguilar v. Texas, (1964) 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 , and Spinelli v. United States, (1969) 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S.Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 , is satisfied. 1980We examine, therefore, the information contained in the tip to determine whether the two prong test established in Aguilar v. Texas, (1964) 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 , and Spinelli v. United States, (1969) 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S.Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 , is satisfied.	1	1980–1980
Aguilar v. Texas red scotus · 1964 2 sentences 1980We examine, therefore, the information contained in the tip to determine whether the two prong test established in Aguilar v. Texas, (1964) 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 , and Spinelli v. United States, (1969) 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S.Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 , is satisfied. 1980We examine, therefore, the information contained in the tip to determine whether the two prong test established in Aguilar v. Texas, (1964) 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 , 12 L.Ed.2d 723 , and Spinelli v. United States, (1969) 393 U.S. 410 , 89 S.Ct. 584 , 21 L.Ed.2d 637 , is satisfied.	1	1980–1980

Statutes the citing opinions construe

IN § Ind. Code § 35-42-2-1 (4) IN § Ind. Code § 35-42-1-1 (3) IN § Ind. Code § 35-50-2-9 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

OH 305 (1990–2026) TX 171 (1970–2025) TN 108 (1994–2024) NJ 57 (1987–2026) LA 52 (1983–2025) CT 47 (1985–2024) IL 47 (1986–2026) IN 30 (1980–2023) FL 29 (1988–2025) PA 28 (1977–2019) WA 27 (1999–2024) MS 17 (1984–2006) CA 16 (1983–2025) MO 15 (1986–2021) GA 14 (1980–2021) KS 14 (2020–2026) NC 12 (1978–2025) SC 9 (1986–2013) DE 8 (1982–2024) OK 8 (1986–2018) NM 8 (1974–2025) WI 7 (1991–2026) AR 7 (2016–2026) ME 6 (1987–2021) SD 6 (1997–2024) MD 6 (1983–2020) MT 6 (1991–2017) ID 5 (1999–2023) HI 5 (2003–2020) KY 5 (1995–2026) WV 5 (1981–2021) MN 5 (1988–2024) NY 5 (2002–2016) RI 3 (1995–2011) DC 3 (1984–2000) MA 3 (2000–2026) NV 3 (2009–2016) VA 3 (1997–2007) AZ 2 (1984–1996) UT 2 (1991–2019) CO 2 (1996–2009)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check