30 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1968–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Liggettgreen2 sentences1996See People v. Liggett, 378 Mich. 706, 716, 717 [ 148 N.W.2d 784 ] (1967); Chapman v. California, supra ." *900 [ Robinson, 386 Mich. at 562-563 , 194 N.W.2d 709 .] This Court later unanimously applied the Robinson standard in a case with strong similarities to the instant case. 1996See People v. Liggett, 378 Mich. 706, 716, 717 [ 148 N.W.2d 784 ] (1967); Chapman v. California, supra ." *900 [ Robinson, 386 Mich. at 562-563 , 194 N.W.2d 709 .] This Court later unanimously applied the Robinson standard in a case with strong similarities to the instant case. | 9 | 9 |
People v. Robinsongreen2 sentences1982First, is the error so offensive to the maintenance of a sound judicial process that it never can be regarded as harmless? * * * Second, if not so basic, can we declare a belief that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?” Robinson , p 563. 1982"First is the error so offensive to the maintenance of a sound judicial process that it never can be regarded as harmless? * * * Second, if not so basic, can we declare a belief that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?” People v Robinson, 386 Mich 551, 563 ; 194 NW2d 709 (1972). | 6 | 16 |
People v. Wichmangreen2 sentences1978First, is the error so offensive to maintenance of a sound judicial process that it never can be regarded as harmless? * * * Second, if not so basic, can we declare a belief that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?’ "People v Mobley, 390 Mich 57, 65 ; 210 NW2d 327, 332 (1973), People v Robinson, 386 Mich 551, 563 ; 194 NW2d 709, 713 (1972), People v Wichman, 15 Mich App 110, 116 ; 166 NW2d 298, 302 (1968).” A review of the record discloses that this error was truly harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. 1978First, is the error so offensive to maintenance of a sound judicial process that it never can be regarded as harmless? * * * Second, if not so basic, can we declare a belief that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?’ "People v Mobley, 390 Mich 57, 65 ; 210 NW2d 327, 332 (1973), People v Robinson, 386 Mich 551, 563 ; 194 NW2d 709, 713 (1972), People v Wichman, 15 Mich App 110, 116 ; 166 NW2d 298, 302 (1968).” A review of the record discloses that this error was truly harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. | 3 | 4 |
People v. Mobleygreen2 sentences1978First, is the error so offensive to maintenance of a sound judicial process that it never can be regarded as harmless? * * * Second, if not so basic, can we declare a belief that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?’ "People v Mobley, 390 Mich 57, 65 ; 210 NW2d 327, 332 (1973), People v Robinson, 386 Mich 551, 563 ; 194 NW2d 709, 713 (1972), People v Wichman, 15 Mich App 110, 116 ; 166 NW2d 298, 302 (1968).” A review of the record discloses that this error was truly harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. 1978First, is the error so offensive to maintenance of a sound judicial process that it never can be regarded as harmless? * * * Second, if not so basic, can we declare a belief that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt?’ "People v Mobley, 390 Mich 57, 65 ; 210 NW2d 327, 332 (1973), People v Robinson, 386 Mich 551, 563 ; 194 NW2d 709, 713 (1972), People v Wichman, 15 Mich App 110, 116 ; 166 NW2d 298, 302 (1968).” A review of the record discloses that this error was truly harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. | 2 | 3 |
People v. Swangreen2 sentences1987See People v Liggett, 378 Mich 706, 716, 717 [ 148 NW2d 784 (1967)]; Chapman v California, supra. As noted in People v Swan, 56 Mich App 22, 32 ; 223 NW2d 346 (1974), "[a]n error may be intolerably offensive ... if it deprives the defendant of a fundamental element of the adversary process . . . .” See People v Mobley, 390 Mich 57 ; 210 NW2d 327 (1973). 1987See People v Liggett, 378 Mich 706, 716, 717 [ 148 NW2d 784 (1967)]; Chapman v California, supra. As noted in People v Swan, 56 Mich App 22, 32 ; 223 NW2d 346 (1974), "[a]n error may be intolerably offensive ... if it deprives the defendant of a fundamental element of the adversary process . . . .” See People v Mobley, 390 Mich 57 ; 210 NW2d 327 (1973). | 1 | 3 |
Saunders v. Peoplegreen2 sentences1991We have refused to punish a criminal defendant because "it would seem to be the duty of [an officer of the law] to take such steps as would be likely to prevent the commission of the offense, and tend to the elevation and improvement of the would-be criminal, rather than to his farther debasement.” Saunders v People, 38 Mich 218, 222 (1878) (Marston, J., concurring). 1991We have refused to punish a criminal defendant because "it would seem to be the duty of [an officer of the law] to take such steps as would be likely to prevent the commission of the offense, and tend to the elevation and improvement of the would-be criminal, rather than to his farther debasement." Saunders v People, 38 Mich 218, 222 (1878) (MARSTON, J., concurring). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Caffraygreen2 sentences1977People v Caffray 62 Mich App 486, 493 ; 233 NW2d 625, 628 (1975). 1977People v Caffray 62 Mich App 486, 493 ; 233 NW2d 625, 628 (1975). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Chapman v. California
red
2 sentences1987See People v Liggett, 378 Mich 706, 716, 717 [ 148 NW2d 784 (1967)]; Chapman v California, supra. As noted in People v Swan, 56 Mich App 22, 32 ; 223 NW2d 346 (1974), "[a]n error may be intolerably offensive ... if it deprives the defendant of a fundamental element of the adversary process . . . .” See People v Mobley, 390 Mich 57 ; 210 NW2d 327 (1973). 1982See People v Liggett, 378 Mich 706, 716-717 ; 148 NW2d 784 (1967); Chapman v California, supra. ’ ” In this case it is beyond question that there was no miscarriage of justice. | 2 | 1982–1987 |
In Re Contempt of Henry
green
2 sentences2015Chrysler contends the circuit court expressed a belief at the hearing that the air pollution control tax-exemption certificates could not be separated from the water pollution control tax-exemption certificates. “[A] court speaks through its written orders and judgments, not through its oral pronouncements.” In re Contempt of Henry, 282 Mich App 656, 678 ; 765 NW2d 44 (2009). 2015Chrysler contends the circuit court expressed a belief at the hearing that the air pollution control tax-exemption certificates could not be separated from the water pollution control tax-exemption certificates. “[A] court speaks through its written orders and judgments, not through its oral pronouncements.” In re Contempt of Henry, 282 Mich App 656, 678 ; 765 NW2d 44 (2009). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
People v. Nixten
green
2 sentences1989People v Robinson, 386 Mich 551, 563 ; 194 NW2d 709 (1972); People v Nixten, 160 Mich App 203, 211 ; 408 NW2d 77 (1987). 1989People v Robinson, 386 Mich 551, 563 ; 194 NW2d 709 (1972); People v Nixten, 160 Mich App 203, 211 ; 408 NW2d 77 (1987). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
People v. Stubl
green
2 sentences1988People v Stubl, 149 Mich App 42, 46-47 ; 385 NW2d 719 (1986), lv den 425 Mich 864 (1986). 1988People v Stubl, 149 Mich App 42, 46-47 ; 385 NW2d 719 (1986), lv den 425 Mich 864 (1986). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
People v. Keen
green
2 sentences1978People v Keen, 396 Mich 573 ; 242 NW2d 405 (1976). 4 The question becomes whether the error was so offensive to the" maintenance of a sound judicial process that it never can be regarded harmless; and, if not so basic, whether we can declare a belief that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. 1978People v Keen, 396 Mich 573 ; 242 NW2d 405 (1976). 4 The question becomes whether the error was so offensive to the" maintenance of a sound judicial process that it never can be regarded harmless; and, if not so basic, whether we can declare a belief that the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
People v. Christensen
green
2 sentences1978People v Christensen, 64 Mich App 23, 33 ; 235 NW2d 50 (1975). 1978People v Christensen, 64 Mich App 23, 33 ; 235 NW2d 50 (1975). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
People v. Lundberg
green
2 sentences1975See People v Liggett, 378 Mich 706, 716, 717 (1967); Chapman v California, supra. ’ ” People v Lundberg, 364 Mich 596 ; 111 NW2d 809 (1961), indicates the standard of review may vary for a nonjury trial. 1975See People v Liggett, 378 Mich 706, 716, 717 (1967); Chapman v California, supra. ’ ” People v Lundberg, 364 Mich 596 ; 111 NW2d 809 (1961), indicates the standard of review may vary for a nonjury trial. | 1 | 1975–1975 |
People v. Shirk
green
2 sentences1973See People v. Liggett *66 (1967), 378 Mich 706, 716, 717 [ 148 NW2d 784 ]; Chapman v. California, supra.”’ For other analyses see People v Shirk, 383 Mich 180 ; 174 NW2d 772 (1970) and People v Rodgers, 388 Mich 513 ; 201 NW2d 621 (1972). 1973See People v. Liggett *66 (1967), 378 Mich 706, 716, 717 [ 148 NW2d 784 ]; Chapman v. California, supra.”’ For other analyses see People v Shirk, 383 Mich 180 ; 174 NW2d 772 (1970) and People v Rodgers, 388 Mich 513 ; 201 NW2d 621 (1972). | 1 | 1973–1973 |
People v. Rodgers
green
2 sentences1973See People v. Liggett *66 (1967), 378 Mich 706, 716, 717 [ 148 NW2d 784 ]; Chapman v. California, supra.”’ For other analyses see People v Shirk, 383 Mich 180 ; 174 NW2d 772 (1970) and People v Rodgers, 388 Mich 513 ; 201 NW2d 621 (1972). 1973See People v. Liggett *66 (1967), 378 Mich 706, 716, 717 [ 148 NW2d 784 ]; Chapman v. California, supra.”’ For other analyses see People v Shirk, 383 Mich 180 ; 174 NW2d 772 (1970) and People v Rodgers, 388 Mich 513 ; 201 NW2d 621 (1972). | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.