Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 North Dakota opinions name it 1 courts 1983–2013 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Dakota courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Douglass v. Douglassgreen2 sentences2004Co. , supra , 404 N.W.2d at 507 [quoting Douglass v. Douglass , 199 Okl. 519 , 188 P.2d 221, 224 (1947)]. [¶19] The doctrine of equitable estoppel is codified in N.D.C.C. § 31-11-06, which provides that “[w]hen a party, by that party’s own declaration, act, or omission, intentionally and deliberately has led another to believe a particular thing true and to act upon such belief, that party shall not be permitted to falsify it in any litigation arising out of such declaration, act, or omission.” To successfully implement equitable estoppel under N.D.C.C. § 31-11-06, the plaintiff carries the bu 2004Co. , supra , 404 N.W.2d at 507 [quoting Douglass v. Douglass , 199 Okl. 519 , 188 P.2d 221, 224 (1947)]. [¶19] The doctrine of equitable estoppel is codified in N.D.C.C. § 31-11-06, which provides that “[w]hen a party, by that party’s own declaration, act, or omission, intentionally and deliberately has led another to believe a particular thing true and to act upon such belief, that party shall not be permitted to falsify it in any litigation arising out of such declaration, act, or omission.” To successfully implement equitable estoppel under N.D.C.C. § 31-11-06, the plaintiff carries the bu | 3 | 3 |
State v. Smithgreen2 sentences2013See Smith, 1999 ND 109, ¶ 22 , 595 N.W.2d 565 . 2013See Smith, 1999 ND 109, ¶ 22 , 595 N.W.2d 565 . | 2 | 2 |
Clark v. Stategreen2 sentences2005See, e.g., Clark v. State, 2001 ND 9, ¶ 15 , 621 N.W.2d 576 ; State v. Syvertson, 1999 ND 134, ¶ 38 , 597 N.W.2d 652 ; City of Mandan v. Baer, 1998 ND 101, ¶ 10 , 578 N.W.2d 559 ; State v. Chihanski, 540 N.W.2d 621, 623 (N.D.1995); see also State v. Klose, 2003 ND 39, ¶ 32 , 657 N.W.2d 276 ("a constitutional error may be found harmless beyond a reasonable doubt"). 2005See, e.g., Clark v. State, 2001 ND 9, ¶ 15 , 621 N.W.2d 576 ; State v. Syvertson, 1999 ND 134, ¶ 38 , 597 N.W.2d 652 ; City of Mandan v. Baer, 1998 ND 101, ¶ 10 , 578 N.W.2d 559 ; State v. Chihanski, 540 N.W.2d 621, 623 (N.D.1995); see also State v. Klose, 2003 ND 39, ¶ 32 , 657 N.W.2d 276 (“a constitutional error may be found harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Klosegreen2 sentences2005See, e.g., Clark v. State, 2001 ND 9, ¶ 15 , 621 N.W.2d 576 ; State v. Syvertson, 1999 ND 134, ¶ 38 , 597 N.W.2d 652 ; City of Mandan v. Baer, 1998 ND 101, ¶ 10 , 578 N.W.2d 559 ; State v. Chihanski, 540 N.W.2d 621, 623 (N.D.1995); see also State v. Klose, 2003 ND 39, ¶ 32 , 657 N.W.2d 276 (“a constitutional error may be found harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”). 2005See, e.g., Clark v. State, 2001 ND 9, ¶ 15 , 621 N.W.2d 576 ; State v. Syvertson, 1999 ND 134, ¶ 38 , 597 N.W.2d 652 ; City of Mandan v. Baer, 1998 ND 101, ¶ 10 , 578 N.W.2d 559 ; State v. Chihanski, 540 N.W.2d 621, 623 (N.D.1995); see also State v. Klose, 2003 ND 39, ¶ 32 , 657 N.W.2d 276 (“a constitutional error may be found harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”). | 1 | 1 |
Clark v. Stategreen2 sentences2005See, e.g., Clark v. State, 2001 ND 9, ¶ 15 , 621 N.W.2d 576 ; State v. Syvertson, 1999 ND 134, ¶ 38 , 597 N.W.2d 652 ; City of Mandan v. Baer, 1998 ND 101, ¶ 10 , 578 N.W.2d 559 ; State v. Chihanski, 540 N.W.2d 621, 623 (N.D.1995); see also State v. Klose, 2003 ND 39, ¶ 32 , 657 N.W.2d 276 ("a constitutional error may be found harmless beyond a reasonable doubt"). 2005See, e.g., Clark v. State, 2001 ND 9, ¶ 15 , 621 N.W.2d 576 ; State v. Syvertson, 1999 ND 134, ¶ 38 , 597 N.W.2d 652 ; City of Mandan v. Baer, 1998 ND 101, ¶ 10 , 578 N.W.2d 559 ; State v. Chihanski, 540 N.W.2d 621, 623 (N.D.1995); see also State v. Klose, 2003 ND 39, ¶ 32 , 657 N.W.2d 276 (“a constitutional error may be found harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Chihanskigreen2 sentences2005See, e.g., Clark v. State, 2001 ND 9, ¶ 15 , 621 N.W.2d 576 ; State v. Syvertson, 1999 ND 134, ¶ 38 , 597 N.W.2d 652 ; City of Mandan v. Baer, 1998 ND 101, ¶ 10 , 578 N.W.2d 559 ; State v. Chihanski, 540 N.W.2d 621, 623 (N.D.1995); see also State v. Klose, 2003 ND 39, ¶ 32 , 657 N.W.2d 276 ("a constitutional error may be found harmless beyond a reasonable doubt"). 2005See, e.g., Clark v. State, 2001 ND 9, ¶ 15 , 621 N.W.2d 576 ; State v. Syvertson, 1999 ND 134, ¶ 38 , 597 N.W.2d 652 ; City of Mandan v. Baer, 1998 ND 101, ¶ 10 , 578 N.W.2d 559 ; State v. Chihanski, 540 N.W.2d 621, 623 (N.D.1995); see also State v. Klose, 2003 ND 39, ¶ 32 , 657 N.W.2d 276 (“a constitutional error may be found harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Dakota. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Szarkowski v. Reliance Insurance Co.
green
2 sentences2004Co. , supra , 404 N.W.2d at 507 [quoting Douglass v. Douglass , 199 Okl. 519 , 188 P.2d 221, 224 (1947)]. [¶19] The doctrine of equitable estoppel is codified in N.D.C.C. § 31-11-06, which provides that “[w]hen a party, by that party’s own declaration, act, or omission, intentionally and deliberately has led another to believe a particular thing true and to act upon such belief, that party shall not be permitted to falsify it in any litigation arising out of such declaration, act, or omission.” To successfully implement equitable estoppel under N.D.C.C. § 31-11-06, the plaintiff carries the bu 2004Co., supra, 404 N.W.2d at 507 [quoting Douglass v. Douglass, 199 Okl. 519 , 188 P.2d 221, 224 (1947) ]. [¶ 19] The doctrine of equitable estoppel is codified in N.D.C.C. § 31 — 11— 06, which provides that “[w]hen a party, by that party’s own declaration, act, or omission, intentionally and deliberately has led another to believe a particular thing true and to act upon such belief, that party shall not be permitted to falsify it in any litigation arising out of such declaration, act, or omission.” To successfully implement equitable estoppel under N.D.C.C. § 31-11-06, the plaintiff carries the | 3 | 1990–2004 |
City of Mandan v. Baer
green
2 sentences2005See, e.g., Clark v. State, 2001 ND 9, ¶ 15 , 621 N.W.2d 576 ; State v. Syvertson, 1999 ND 134, ¶ 38 , 597 N.W.2d 652 ; City of Mandan v. Baer, 1998 ND 101, ¶ 10 , 578 N.W.2d 559 ; State v. Chihanski, 540 N.W.2d 621, 623 (N.D.1995); see also State v. Klose, 2003 ND 39, ¶ 32 , 657 N.W.2d 276 (“a constitutional error may be found harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”). 2005See, e.g., Clark v. State, 2001 ND 9, ¶ 15 , 621 N.W.2d 576 ; State v. Syvertson, 1999 ND 134, ¶ 38 , 597 N.W.2d 652 ; City of Mandan v. Baer, 1998 ND 101, ¶ 10 , 578 N.W.2d 559 ; State v. Chihanski, 540 N.W.2d 621, 623 (N.D.1995); see also State v. Klose, 2003 ND 39, ¶ 32 , 657 N.W.2d 276 (“a constitutional error may be found harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Syvertson
green
2 sentences2005See, e.g., Clark v. State, 2001 ND 9, ¶ 15 , 621 N.W.2d 576 ; State v. Syvertson, 1999 ND 134, ¶ 38 , 597 N.W.2d 652 ; City of Mandan v. Baer, 1998 ND 101, ¶ 10 , 578 N.W.2d 559 ; State v. Chihanski, 540 N.W.2d 621, 623 (N.D.1995); see also State v. Klose, 2003 ND 39, ¶ 32 , 657 N.W.2d 276 (“a constitutional error may be found harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”). 2005See, e.g., Clark v. State, 2001 ND 9, ¶ 15 , 621 N.W.2d 576 ; State v. Syvertson, 1999 ND 134, ¶ 38 , 597 N.W.2d 652 ; City of Mandan v. Baer, 1998 ND 101, ¶ 10 , 578 N.W.2d 559 ; State v. Chihanski, 540 N.W.2d 621, 623 (N.D.1995); see also State v. Klose, 2003 ND 39, ¶ 32 , 657 N.W.2d 276 (“a constitutional error may be found harmless beyond a reasonable doubt”). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Reynolds v. United States
green
2 sentences1983Principles defined by the United States Supreme Court in Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 , 25 L.Ed. 244 (1878), as to a conflict between law and a belief in the doctrine of polygamy, support this conclusion. 1983Principles defined by the United States Supreme Court in Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 , 25 L.Ed. 244 (1878), as to a conflict between law and a belief in the doctrine of polygamy, support this conclusion. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.