30 Pennsylvania opinions name it 5 courts 1889–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Commonwealth v. Peraltagreen2 sentences2020Peralta, 173 A.3d at 817 . 2019Commonwealth v. Peralta, 173 A.3d 813, 816 (Pa. Super. 2017). | 1 | 2 |
In Re ZPgreen1 sentence2025We reemphasize that J.M.T.R. would require several years to develop the ____________________________________________ 12 Accord In re Z.P., 994 A.2d 1108, 1120 (Pa. Super. 2010) (“The cause of incarceration may be particularly relevant to the Section 2511(a) analysis, where imprisonment arises as a direct result of the parent’s actions which were part of the original reasons for the removal of the child.”) (internal citation and internal quotations marks omitted) 13 While the record reflects that a status hearing in Mother’s criminal matter was to be held on February 25, 2025, the disposition o | 1 | 1 |
Baskerville v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.green1 sentence2020See Baskerville v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc., 419 A.2d 1355, 1357 (Pa.Super. 1980); Autologic Inc. v. Cristinzio Movers, 481 A.2d 1362, 1363 (Pa.Super. 1984); Duckson v. Wee Wheelers, Inc., 620 A.2d 1206, 1210 (Pa.Super. 1993). -9- J-S71005-19 its defense and that, in any event, a timely response was necessary, it failed to inquire as to the status of its claim or even to seek any assurances from the insurance carrier that it was being represented. | 1 | 1 |
Duckson v. Wee Wheelers, Inc.green1 sentence2020See Baskerville v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc., 419 A.2d 1355, 1357 (Pa.Super. 1980); Autologic Inc. v. Cristinzio Movers, 481 A.2d 1362, 1363 (Pa.Super. 1984); Duckson v. Wee Wheelers, Inc., 620 A.2d 1206, 1210 (Pa.Super. 1993). -9- J-S71005-19 its defense and that, in any event, a timely response was necessary, it failed to inquire as to the status of its claim or even to seek any assurances from the insurance carrier that it was being represented. | 1 | 1 |
White v. CONESTOGA TITLE INSURANCE COMPANYgreen1 sentence2020In a Rule 600 proceeding, it is the Commonwealth’s burden to demonstrate, by a preponderance of the evidence, that it put forth “reasonable effort.” Commonwealth v. Selenski, 994 A.2d 1083, 1089 (Pa. 2010). | 1 | 1 |
Autologic Inc. v. Cristinzio Moversgreen1 sentence2020See Baskerville v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc., 419 A.2d 1355, 1357 (Pa.Super. 1980); Autologic Inc. v. Cristinzio Movers, 481 A.2d 1362, 1363 (Pa.Super. 1984); Duckson v. Wee Wheelers, Inc., 620 A.2d 1206, 1210 (Pa.Super. 1993). -9- J-S71005-19 its defense and that, in any event, a timely response was necessary, it failed to inquire as to the status of its claim or even to seek any assurances from the insurance carrier that it was being represented. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Armstronggreen1 sentence2016This is attributable in part to the “reorganization of the Philadelphia criminal court system by geographical zone.” Commonwealth v. Armstrong, 74 A.3d 228, 237 (Pa.Super. 2013)[.] Whether…this time is chargeable to the Commonwealth begs the question of its due diligence. | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Cunninghamgreen1 sentence2015A status hearing was set for December 17, 2012, but the hearing was continued to April 22, 2013, pending the outcome of Commonwealth v. Cunningham, 81 A.3d 1, 11 (Pa.2013); a petition for writ of certiorari was pending before the United States Supreme Court. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Prestegaardgreen1 sentence1993Accord, In re Prestegaard, 139 B.R. 117 (Bankr. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Hermansengreen1 sentence1993See In re Hermansen, 84 B.R. 729 (Bankr.D.Colo. 1988) (the correct way to establish effect, extent and value of a judicial lien not avoided under the 11 U.S.C. § 522 (f) homestead exemption is by the use of 11 U.S.C. § 506 governing the status of the claim as secured, undersecured or unsecured and 11 U.S.C. § 502 governing the allowance of claims against or interest in the debtor’s property). | 1 | 1 |
Nuhfer v. Nuhfergreen2 sentences1992See Nuhfer v. Nuhfer, 410 Pa. Super. 380, 383 , 599 A.2d 1348, 1349 (1991) which explains that the addition of subsection (8) to what was then section 401(e) of the Divorce Code, now section 3501(a), was intended to clarify the law stated in Hurley v. Hurley, 342 Pa. Super. 156 , 492 A.2d 439 (1985), and that the amendment requires the court to look to the time a cause of action accrues, rather than to the time of liquidation. 1992See Nuhfer v. Nuhfer, 410 Pa. Super. 380, 383 , 599 A.2d 1348, 1349 (1991) which explains that the addition of subsection (8) to what was then section 401(e) of the Divorce Code, now section 3501(a), was intended to clarify the law stated in Hurley v. Hurley, 342 Pa. Super. 156 , 492 A.2d 439 (1985), and that the amendment requires the court to look to the time a cause of action accrues, rather than to the time of liquidation. | 1 | 1 |
Hurley v. Hurleygreen2 sentences1992See Nuhfer v. Nuhfer, 410 Pa. Super. 380, 383 , 599 A.2d 1348, 1349 (1991) which explains that the addition of subsection (8) to what was then section 401(e) of the Divorce Code, now section 3501(a), was intended to clarify the law stated in Hurley v. Hurley, 342 Pa. Super. 156 , 492 A.2d 439 (1985), and that the amendment requires the court to look to the time a cause of action accrues, rather than to the time of liquidation. 1992See Nuhfer v. Nuhfer, 410 Pa. Super. 380, 383 , 599 A.2d 1348, 1349 (1991) which explains that the addition of subsection (8) to what was then section 401(e) of the Divorce Code, now section 3501(a), was intended to clarify the law stated in Hurley v. Hurley, 342 Pa. Super. 156 , 492 A.2d 439 (1985), and that the amendment requires the court to look to the time a cause of action accrues, rather than to the time of liquidation. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Appeal of Arndt
green
2 sentences1903The case involves only the effect of the sale in partition upon the lien of appellant’s claim on the land, for if the lien was divested from the land and transferred to the fund, the status of the claim at the time the sale was confirmed must determine the right to participate in distribution: Arndt’s Appeal, 117 Pa. 120 . 1889Note. — In Arndt’s Ap., 117 Pa. 120 , it is said that the question of lien, or the running of the statute, is determined hy the status of the claim at the time of the . confirmation of the sale. | 3 | 1889–1913 |
Commonwealth v. Lewis
green
2 sentences2020Counsel for Appellant asked [the trial c]ourt to reconsider denying the [m]otion and to review [Commonwealth v. Carontenuto, 148 A.3d 448 (Pa. Super. 2016) and Commonwealth v. Lewis, 180 A.3d 786 (Pa. Super. 2018)]. 2020Counsel for Appellant asked [the trial c]ourt to reconsider denying the [m]otion and to review [Commonwealth v. Carontenuto, 148 A.3d 448 (Pa. Super. 2016) and Commonwealth v. Lewis, 180 A.3d 786 (Pa. Super. 2018)]. | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Commonwealth v. Kane
green
2 sentences2020Counsel for Appellant asked [the trial c]ourt to reconsider denying the [m]otion and to review [Commonwealth v. Carontenuto, 148 A.3d 448 (Pa. Super. 2016) and Commonwealth v. Lewis, 180 A.3d 786 (Pa. Super. 2018)]. 2020Counsel for Appellant asked [the trial c]ourt to reconsider denying the [m]otion and to review [Commonwealth v. Carontenuto, 148 A.3d 448 (Pa. Super. 2016) and Commonwealth v. Lewis, 180 A.3d 786 (Pa. Super. 2018)]. | 2 | 2020–2020 |
In the Int. of: K.G.-B., Appeal of: K.G.-B.
neutral
1 sentence2026Id. | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Commonwealth v. Grazier
green
2 sentences2025Based on Appellant’s wishes, the court conducted a hearing pursuant to Commonwealth v. Grazier, 552 Pa. 9 , 713 A.2d 81 (1998). 2025Based on Appellant’s wishes, the court conducted a hearing pursuant to Commonwealth v. Grazier, 552 Pa. 9 , 713 A.2d 81 (1998). | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Gagnon v. Scarpelli
red
2 sentences2023The probation officer filed a Gagnon II summary, ____________________________________________ 1 As will be discussed more fully infra, “in Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778 (1973), the United States Supreme Court held that probationers are entitled to two hearings when a violation of probation is alleged.” Commonwealth v. Mayfield, 247 A.3d 1002 , 1003 n.2 (Pa. 2021) (citation altered). 2023The probation officer filed a Gagnon II summary, ____________________________________________ 1 As will be discussed more fully infra, “in Gagnon v. Scarpelli, 411 U.S. 778 (1973), the United States Supreme Court held that probationers are entitled to two hearings when a violation of probation is alleged.” Commonwealth v. Mayfield, 247 A.3d 1002 , 1003 n.2 (Pa. 2021) (citation altered). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Commonwealth v. Finley
green
1 sentence2022That same day, [PCRA counsel], was ____________________________________________ 1 See Commonwealth v. Turner, 544 A.2d 927 (Pa. 1988), and Commonwealth v. Finley, 550 A.2d 213 (Pa. Super. 1988) (en banc). -2- J-S23032-22 appointed to represent ...[Wallick]. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Commonwealth v. Turner
green
1 sentence2022That same day, [PCRA counsel], was ____________________________________________ 1 See Commonwealth v. Turner, 544 A.2d 927 (Pa. 1988), and Commonwealth v. Finley, 550 A.2d 213 (Pa. Super. 1988) (en banc). -2- J-S23032-22 appointed to represent ...[Wallick]. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Reid v. Boohar
green
1 sentence2021The trial court further explained that, unlike the case of Reid v. Boohar, 856 A.2d 156 (Pa. Super. 2004), where this Court found that the insured had a reasonable excuse, KLS did not allege that its insurance carriers were unresponsive, made a mistake or oversight in their operation or lost their claim files. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Brady v. Maryland
green
1 sentence2018This Court held a status hearing on January 8, 2016, in preparation for an evidentiary hearing to be held on January 26, 2016, on petitioner's claim that trial counsel had rendered ineffective assistance for failure to present the defense that petitioner had requested, namely that petitioner was 10 Brady v. Macyland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963). 11 Rafi Smith was an associate of petitioner's who has, at various times, admitted or denied his presence in the gun battle central to this case, and asserted the participation of other individuals in the gun battle. 3 not present at the gun battle. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Miller v. Alabama
green
1 sentence2015On April 22, 2013, the matter was again deferred pending a decision on the retroactivity of Miller v. Alabama, 132 S.Ct. 2455 ([U.S.]2012), the appeal in the Cunningham case before the U.S. Supreme Court or new legislation. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Hughes v. Seven Springs Farm, Inc.
green
2 sentences2001Further, the case was, in fact, remanded for consideration of the defense of contributory negligence since it was held that the trial court was wrong to reject the defense initially. ¶ 28 Our Supreme Court in Hughes v. Seven Springs Farm, Inc., 563 Pa. 501 , 762 A.2d 339 (2000), discussed the status of the doctrine of assumption of the risk in light of the passage of the comparative negligence statute. 2001Further, the case was, in fact, remanded for consideration of the defense of contributory negligence since it was held that the trial court was wrong to reject the defense initially. ¶ 28 Our Supreme Court in Hughes v. Seven Springs Farm, Inc., 563 Pa. 501 , 762 A.2d 339 (2000), discussed the status of the doctrine of assumption of the risk in light of the passage of the comparative negligence statute. | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Solar Construction Co. v. Department of General Services
neutral
1 sentence1993Solar Construction Company, Inc. v. Department of General Services, 105 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 609, 525 A.2d 28 (1987). | 1 | 1993–1993 |
Commonwealth v. Camm
green
1 sentence1986The issue, as phrased by the Camm court on appeal, concerned “the status of the privilege [against self-incrimination] of a defendant who does take the stand to testify on his own behalf, but for a limited purpose; specifically, whether the privilege against self-incrimination was waived for all purposes when Camm testified to the events surrounding his arrest, detention, interrogation and confession.” Id. at 263-64 , 277 A.2d at 330 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
McConnell v. Anderson
green
1 sentence1986The issue, as phrased by the Camm court on appeal, concerned “the status of the privilege [against self-incrimination] of a defendant who does take the stand to testify on his own behalf, but for a limited purpose; specifically, whether the privilege against self-incrimination was waived for all purposes when Camm testified to the events surrounding his arrest, detention, interrogation and confession.” Id. at 263-64 , 277 A.2d at 330 . | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Replogle v. Commonwealth, Department of Transportation
green
2 sentences1981Replogle v. Department of Transportation, 60 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 183 , 430 A.2d 1221 (1981). 1981Replogle v. Department of Transportation, 60 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 183 , 430 A.2d 1221 (1981). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Kenney v. Supreme Lodge of the World, Loyal Order of Moose
green
1 sentence1976Although the support for Anglo-American Provision Co. has been weakened, see, Kenney v. Supreme Lodge, 252 U.S. 411 (1920), the status of that principle need not concern us today. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
| Ferguson's Estate green | 1 | 1940–1940 |
Metcalf's Estate
green
1 sentence1940On the general question of repeal by implication and the presumptions against it see Ferguson’s Estate, 325 Pa. 34 , Metcalf’s Estate, 319 Pa. 28 , and P. & L. | 1 | 1940–1940 |
| Love v. Clayton green | 1 | 1930–1930 |
| Wolff's Estate neutral | 1 | 1914–1914 |
| Mettfett v. Mohn neutral | 1 | 1914–1914 |
| Douglass's Appeal green | 1 | 1913–1913 |
| Tomlinson's Appeal neutral | 1 | 1913–1913 |
| Shermer's Appeals neutral | 1 | 1889–1889 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.