9 Nebraska opinions name it 1 courts 1976–2022 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nebraska courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Coomesgreen2 sentences2021A status hearing will be held in this matter on Feb[.] 11, 2020, at 1:00, p.m.” The order did not provide a reason for the sua sponte - 753 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports STATE v. COOMES Cite as 309 Neb. 749 removal of Coomes’ retained counsel, but in a later order, the court stated that Worthman had been arrested. 1 (c) February 11 to March 10, 2020 At the status hearing on February 11, 2020, Coomes appeared without counsel. 2021Accord Kolbjornsen, supra note 31 (rejecting defendant’s argument that appellate court could not consider speedy trial issues under separate statute applicable to in-state prisoners because trial court applied only § 29-1207). 48 See Billingsley, supra note 47. - 771 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 309 Nebraska Reports STATE v. COOMES Cite as 309 Neb. 749 the road” and Coomes’ counsel responded, “Judge that’s fine with me.” The court then set the matter for a status hearing on May 12. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bishopgreen2 sentences2021The absence of a cross-appeal in this case does not preclude us from considering whether the record supports additional excludable periods. 48 [20] At the status hearing on April 7, 2020, the State made an oral motion to continue the matter for “a month down 45 State v. Bishop, 263 Neb. 266, 274 , 639 N.W.2d 409, 416 (2002). 46 Id. 47 See, e.g., State v. Billingsley, ante p. 616, ___ N.W.2d ___ (2021) (affirming denial of absolute discharge on grounds different than considered by trial court). 2021The absence of a cross-appeal in this case does not preclude us from considering whether the record supports additional excludable periods. 48 [20] At the status hearing on April 7, 2020, the State made an oral motion to continue the matter for “a month down 45 State v. Bishop, 263 Neb. 266, 274 , 639 N.W.2d 409, 416 (2002). 46 Id. 47 See, e.g., State v. Billingsley, ante p. 616, ___ N.W.2d ___ (2021) (affirming denial of absolute discharge on grounds different than considered by trial court). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nebraska. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Tegra Corp. v. Boeshart
green
1 sentence2022The court stated that “[u]pon conclusion of Mediation, the [Committee] is Ordered to report to the Court the out- come of the mediation and make further recommendations per §21-168.” It scheduled a status hearing for September 20, 2021. - 795 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 311 Nebraska Reports TEGRA CORP. v. BOESHART Cite as 311 Neb. 783 III. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Eletech, Inc. v. Conveyance Consulting Group
green
1 sentence2021The court also reminded the parties of the April 22 trial date. - 737 - Nebraska Supreme Court Advance Sheets 308 Nebraska Reports ELETECH, INC. v. CONVEYANCE CONSULTING GROUP Cite as 308 Neb. 733 On February 14, 2019, the court held a hearing on the motion to compel and a status hearing. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
State v. Jenkins
green
1 sentence2019This could be related to a singular motive or a combination of motives, including malingering and/or a sense of disease.” - 699 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 303 Nebraska R eports STATE v. JENKINS Cite as 303 Neb. 676 Following the July 2014 hearing, the court found that Jenkins was not competent to proceed with sentencing. (ii) February and March 2015 In February 2015, the court held a status hearing regarding Jenkins’ competency. | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Jordan v. LSF8 Master Participation Trust
green
1 sentence2018At a status hearing for both actions, the court stated that it was considering whether to try the two actions together, but noted concern as to whether the two actions involved - 530 - Nebraska Supreme Court A dvance Sheets 300 Nebraska R eports JORDAN v. LSF8 MASTER PARTICIPATION TRUST Cite as 300 Neb. 523 different standards of proof. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
In re Interest of Joseph C.
neutral
1 sentence2018Cite as 299 Neb. 848 Kevin and that the matter be continued to allow the integra- tion of Tina and Rodney into his life with the goal of placing him with them. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
State v. True
green
1 sentence1990In addition to the procedural protections against an erroneous status determination described in part IV(l)(b)(ii), the act itself put Cook on notice of his rights and assured, by designating the status hearing to be a “critical stage” of the proceeding, § 29-2915, that Cook was represented by counsel, State v. True, ante p. 274, 460 N.W.2d 668 (1990). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Gordon Lee Wilkins v. Donald R. Erickson, Warden
green
2 sentences1981In Wilkins v. Erickson, 505 F.2d 761 (9th Cir. 1974), the court discussed the issue in some detail, stating at 763: "Boykin Does Not Require Articulation of the Three Rights "Wilkins relies upon Boykin v. Alabama, supra . 1981In Wilkins v. Erickson, 505 F.2d 761 (9th Cir. 1974), the court discussed the issue in some detail, stating at 763: “Boykin Does Not Require Articulation of the Three Rights “Wilkins relies upon Boykin v. Alabama, supra. He contends that since he was not personally advised by the trial judge on entry of his plea that by pleading guilty he was waiving (1) his privilege against self-incrimination, (2) his right to trial by jury, and (3) his right to confront his accusers; that he was unaware of the consequences, and that his plea, therefore, was not voluntarily and intelligently made. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Garcia v. Hargrove
green
2 sentences1976In Garcia v. Hargrove, 46 Wis. 2d 724 , 176 N. W. 2d 566 (1970), the court stated: “Counsel for both parties and the several briefs of amicus curiae have presented a most helpful review of the recent case' law throughout the country. 1976In Garcia v. Hargrove, 46 Wis. 2d 724 , 176 N. W. 2d 566 (1970), the court stated: “Counsel for both parties and the several briefs of amicus curiae have presented a most helpful review of the recent case' law throughout the country. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.