22 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1972–2024 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Personal Restraint of Youngred2 sentences2007See In re Det. of Turay, 139 Wn.2d 379, 407-08 , 986 P.2d 790 (1999) (court rejected a challenge to a jury instruction because the constitutionality of the instruction had been upheld in Young, 122 Wn.2d at 59 ). ¶8 In Young, after considering the same due process challenge that Wright is making, the court concluded “there are no substantive constitutional impediments to the sexually violent predator scheme.” Young, 122 Wn.2d at 26 . 2007See In re Det. of Turay, 139 Wn.2d 379, 407-08 , 986 P.2d 790 (1999) (court rejected a challenge to a jury instruction because the constitutionality of the instruction had been upheld in Young, 122 Wn.2d at 59 ). ¶8 In Young, after considering the same due process challenge that Wright is making, the court concluded “there are no substantive constitutional impediments to the sexually violent predator scheme.” Young, 122 Wn.2d at 26 . | 2 | 2 |
In re the Detention of Turaygreen2 sentences2007See In re Turay, 139 Wash.2d 379, 407-408 , 986 P.2d 790 (1999) (court rejected a challenge to a jury instruction because the constitutionality of the instruction had been upheld in Young, 122 Wash.2d at 59 , 857 P.2d 989 ). ¶ 8 In Young , after considering the same due process challenge that Wright is making, the court concluded "there are no substantive constitutional impediments to the sexually *947 violent predator scheme." Young, 122 Wash.2d at 26 , 857 P.2d 989 . 2007See In re Det. of Turay, 139 Wn.2d 379, 407-08 , 986 P.2d 790 (1999) (court rejected a challenge to a jury instruction because the constitutionality of the instruction had been upheld in Young, 122 Wn.2d at 59 ). ¶8 In Young, after considering the same due process challenge that Wright is making, the court concluded “there are no substantive constitutional impediments to the sexually violent predator scheme.” Young, 122 Wn.2d at 26 . | 2 | 2 |
In Re Detention of Turaygreen2 sentences2007See In re Turay, 139 Wash.2d 379, 407-408 , 986 P.2d 790 (1999) (court rejected a challenge to a jury instruction because the constitutionality of the instruction had been upheld in Young, 122 Wash.2d at 59 , 857 P.2d 989 ). ¶ 8 In Young , after considering the same due process challenge that Wright is making, the court concluded "there are no substantive constitutional impediments to the sexually *947 violent predator scheme." Young, 122 Wash.2d at 26 , 857 P.2d 989 . 2007See In re Det. of Turay, 139 Wn.2d 379, 407-08 , 986 P.2d 790 (1999) (court rejected a challenge to a jury instruction because the constitutionality of the instruction had been upheld in Young, 122 Wn.2d at 59 ). ¶8 In Young, after considering the same due process challenge that Wright is making, the court concluded “there are no substantive constitutional impediments to the sexually violent predator scheme.” Young, 122 Wn.2d at 26 . | 2 | 2 |
City of Bellevue v. Leegreen2 sentences2019Under Mathews, courts consider three factors in determining whether the process afforded to an individual was sufficient to satisfy the due process clause: First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second,the risk ofan erroneous deprivation ofsuch interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government's interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail. 424 U.S. at 33 2019Fields had the opportunity to request reconsideration by the licensing supervisor, to appeal her disqualification to the Office of Administrative Hearings, and to challenge her disqualification in superior court as a violation of her substantive due process rights. 3 The fact that she was not able to challenge the constitutionality of this rule within the administrative process itself is not a procedural due process violation. ¶ 49 Under Mathews , courts consider three factors in determining whether the process afforded to an individual was sufficient to satisfy the due process clause: First, | 1 | 1 |
City of Bellevue v. Leegreen2 sentences2019Under Mathews, courts consider three factors in determining whether the process afforded to an individual was sufficient to satisfy the due process clause: First, the private interest that will be affected by the official action; second,the risk ofan erroneous deprivation ofsuch interest through the procedures used, and the probable value, if any, of additional or substitute procedural safeguards; and finally, the Government's interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirement would entail. 424 U.S. at 33 2019Fields had the opportunity to request reconsideration by the licensing supervisor, to appeal her disqualification to the Office of Administrative Hearings, and to challenge her disqualification in superior court as a violation of her substantive due process rights. 3 The fact that she was not able to challenge the constitutionality of this rule within the administrative process itself is not a procedural due process violation. ¶ 49 Under Mathews , courts consider three factors in determining whether the process afforded to an individual was sufficient to satisfy the due process clause: First, | 1 | 1 |
Tropiano v. City of Tacomagreen2 sentences1994See Tropiano v. Tacoma, 105 Wn.2d 873, 877 , 718 P.2d 801 (1986). 1994See Tropiano v. Tacoma, 105 Wn.2d 873, 877 , 718 P.2d 801 (1986). | 1 | 1 |
Corrigal v. Ball & Dodd Funeral Home, Inc.green2 sentences1983See also Corrigal v. Ball & Dodd Funeral Home, Inc., 89 Wn.2d 959 , *214 577 P.2d 580 (1978). 1983See also Corrigal v. Ball & Dodd Funeral Home, Inc., 89 Wn.2d 959 , *214 577 P.2d 580 (1978). | 1 | 1 |
National Polymer Products, Inc. v. Borg-Warner Corporationgreen2 sentences1982Corp. v. Koons, 325 F.2d 403 , 407 (2d Cir. 1963), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, speaking through Judge Friendly, said: [W]e entertain no doubt as to the constitutionality of a rule allowing a federal court to forbid the publicizing, in advance of trial, of information obtained by one party from another by use of the court's processes.[ 1 ] In National Polymer Prods., Inc. v. Borg-Warner Corp., 641 F.2d 418, 424 (6th Cir. 1981) (a case in which the parties had consented to a protective order), the Court of Appeals said: An important purpose of a pre-trial protective order is to preserve 1982Corp. v. Koons, 325 F.2d 403 , 407 (2d Cir.1963), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, speaking through Judge Friendly, said: [W]e entertain no doubt as to the constitutionality of a rule allowing a federal court to forbid the publicizing, in advance of trial, of information obtained by one party from another by use of the court's processes.[ [1] ] In National Polymer Prods., Inc. v. Borg-Warner Corp., 641 F.2d 418, 424 (6th Cir.1981) (a case in which the parties had consented to a protective order), the Court of Appeals said: An important purpose of a pre-trial protective order is to preserve | 1 | 1 |
Stephen R. Benchwick v. United Statesgreen1 sentence1972While this contention is not facetiously made, we adopt the language of Benchwick v. United States, 297 F.2d 330, 335 (9th Cir. 1961): *385 This may sometimes present the defendant with a hard choice, but that is true in many situations which may confront litigants in the course of almost every trial, and provides no basis for exempting the defendant from the provisions of the rule [Rule 23(c), Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C.A.]. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Mathews v. Eldridge
green
2 sentences2019Fields had the opportunity to request reconsideration by the licensing supervisor, to appeal her disqualification to the Office of Administrative Hearings, and to challenge her disqualification in superior court as a violation of her substantive due process rights. 3 The fact that she was not able to challenge the constitutionality of this rule within the administrative process itself is not a procedural due process violation. ¶ 49 Under Mathews , courts consider three factors in determining whether the process afforded to an individual was sufficient to satisfy the due process clause: First, 2019Fields had the opportunity to request reconsideration by the licensing supervisor, to appeal her disqualification to the Office of Administrative Hearings, and to challenge her disqualification in superior court as a violation of her substantive due process rights. 3 The fact that she was not able to challenge the constitutionality of this rule within the administrative process itself is not a procedural due process violation. ¶ 49 Under Mathews , courts consider three factors in determining whether the process afforded to an individual was sufficient to satisfy the due process clause: First, | 2 | 2017–2019 |
Longview Fibre Co. v. Department of Ecology
neutral
2 sentences2010Longview Fibre Co. v. Dep't of Ecology, 89 Wash.App. 627, 632-33 , 949 P.2d 851 (1998). ¶ 15 E-Mail. 2010Longview Fibre Co. v. Dep’t of Ecology, 89 Wn. | 2 | 2010–2010 |
State v. Gunwall
green
2 sentences2005We do not consider the constitutionality of a claim under the Washington Constitution unless a party provides the independent analysis required by State v. Gunwall, 106 Wn.2d 54, 61-62 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986). 2005We do not consider the constitutionality of a claim under the Washington Constitution unless a party provides the independent analysis required by State v. Gunwall, 106 Wn.2d 54, 61-62 , 720 P.2d 808 (1986). | 2 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Ferrier
green
2 sentences2005State v. Ferrier, 136 Wn.2d 103, 110 , 960 P.2d 927 (1998). 2005State v. Ferrier, 136 Wash.2d 103, 110 , 960 P.2d 927 (1998). | 2 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Ferrier
green
2 sentences2005State v. Ferrier, 136 Wn.2d 103, 110 , 960 P.2d 927 (1998). 2005State v. Ferrier, 136 Wash.2d 103, 110 , 960 P.2d 927 (1998). | 2 | 2005–2005 |
State v. Bostrom
green
2 sentences2002In State v. Bostrom, 127 Wn.2d 580 , 902 P.2d 157 (1995), this court upheld the constitutionality of the warnings given pursuant to RCW 46.20.308 and held that they did not deprive drivers of an opportunity to make knowing and intelligent decisions whether to take a BAC test. 2002In State v. Bostrom, 127 Wn.2d 580 , 902 P.2d 157 (1995), this court upheld the constitutionality of the warnings given pursuant to RCW 46.20.308 and held that they did not deprive drivers of an opportunity to make knowing and intelligent decisions whether to take a BAC test. | 2 | 2002–2002 |
State v. Moten
green
1 sentence2024State v. Moten, 95 Wn. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
City of Redmond v. Moore
green
1 sentence2023Evans, 184 Wn.2d at 861-62 . 23 No. 38763-1-III State v. Merritt “An as-applied challenge to the constitutional validity of a statute is characterized by a party’s allegation that application of the statute in the specific context of the party’s actions or intended actions is unconstitutional.” City of Redmond v. Moore, 151 Wn.2d 664, 668-69 , 91 P.3d 875 (2004). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
City of Seattle v. Evans
green
1 sentence2023Evans, 184 Wn.2d at 861-62 . 23 No. 38763-1-III State v. Merritt “An as-applied challenge to the constitutional validity of a statute is characterized by a party’s allegation that application of the statute in the specific context of the party’s actions or intended actions is unconstitutional.” City of Redmond v. Moore, 151 Wn.2d 664, 668-69 , 91 P.3d 875 (2004). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
City of Redmond v. Moore
green
1 sentence2023Evans, 184 Wn.2d at 861-62 . 23 No. 38763-1-III State v. Merritt “An as-applied challenge to the constitutional validity of a statute is characterized by a party’s allegation that application of the statute in the specific context of the party’s actions or intended actions is unconstitutional.” City of Redmond v. Moore, 151 Wn.2d 664, 668-69 , 91 P.3d 875 (2004). | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Armstrong v. Manzo
green
2 sentences2017Fields's complaint about the lack of an opportunity to present mitigating circumstances about her conviction and her subsequent rehabilitation goes to the substance of DEL's rule, which we have addressed as a substantive due process claim. 54 Mathews, 424 U.S. at 335 (quoting Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545, 552 , 85 S. Ct. 1187 , 14 L. 2017Fields's complaint about the lack of an opportunity to present mitigating circumstances about her conviction and her subsequent rehabilitation goes to the substance of DEL's rule, which we have addressed as a substantive due process claim. 54 Mathews, 424 U.S. at 335 (quoting Armstrong v. Manzo, 380 U.S. 545, 552 , 85 S. Ct. 1187 , 14 L. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
Victor v. Nebraska
green
1 sentence1997Victor, 511 U.S. at 16-17 . | 1 | 1997–1997 |
State v. Barrington
green
1 sentence1990State v. Barrington, 52 Wn. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Bonds
green
2 sentences1983We also hold, in light of our recent decision in State v. Bonds, 98 Wn.2d 1 , 653 P.2d 1024 (1982), that in a burglary prosecution the information must specify and the instructions must specify and define the crime or crimes the defendant allegedly intended to commit. 1983We also hold, in light of our recent decision in State v. Bonds, 98 Wn.2d 1 , 653 P.2d 1024 (1982), that in a burglary prosecution the information must specify and the instructions must specify and define the crime or crimes the defendant allegedly intended to commit. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
International Products Corporation v. Koons
green
2 sentences1982Corp. v. Koons, 325 F.2d 403 , 407 (2d Cir. 1963), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, speaking through Judge Friendly, said: [W]e entertain no doubt as to the constitutionality of a rule allowing a federal court to forbid the publicizing, in advance of trial, of information obtained by one party from another by use of the court's processes.[ 1 ] In National Polymer Prods., Inc. v. Borg-Warner Corp., 641 F.2d 418, 424 (6th Cir. 1981) (a case in which the parties had consented to a protective order), the Court of Appeals said: An important purpose of a pre-trial protective order is to preserve 1982Corp. v. Koons, 325 F.2d 403 , 407 (2d Cir.1963), the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, speaking through Judge Friendly, said: [W]e entertain no doubt as to the constitutionality of a rule allowing a federal court to forbid the publicizing, in advance of trial, of information obtained by one party from another by use of the court's processes.[ [1] ] In National Polymer Prods., Inc. v. Borg-Warner Corp., 641 F.2d 418, 424 (6th Cir.1981) (a case in which the parties had consented to a protective order), the Court of Appeals said: An important purpose of a pre-trial protective order is to preserve | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Campbell v. Thunderbird Trucking & Construction, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence1982App. 496 , 636 P.2d 494 (1981), where the court upheld the constitutionality of the claim filing requirement of RCW 36.45.030. | 1 | 1982–1982 |
Sandstrom v. Montana
green
2 sentences1980Our analysis of the constitutionality of the presumption instruction in this case is governed by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510 , 61 L.Ed.2d 39 , 99 S.Ct. 2450 (1979), which considered a virtually identical instruction. 1980Our analysis of the constitutionality of the presumption instruction in this case is governed by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510 , 61 L.Ed.2d 39 , 99 S.Ct. 2450 (1979), which considered a virtually identical instruction. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
State v. Roberts
green
2 sentences1977This court has recently considered the constitutionality of this instruction in State v. Roberts, 88 Wn.2d 337 , 562 P.2d 1259 (1977). 1977This court has recently considered the constitutionality of this instruction in State v. Roberts, 88 Wn.2d 337 , 562 P.2d 1259 (1977). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.