10 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1895–2012 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Matter of Paternity of ARRgreen1 sentence2002This general rule also applies to the constitutionality of a statute."); Matter of A.R.R, 634 N.E.2d 786, 791 (Ind.Ct.App. 1994) (determining that it may not consider a challenge to the constitutionality of the standard for modification of custody in Indiana's paternity statute because this issue was not presented to the trial court and "[qluestions regarding the constitutionality of a statute must be raised in the trial court before the filing of the motion to correct errors"); Hopster v. Burgeson, 750 N.E.2d 841, 847-48 (Ind.Ct.App.2001) (observing that challenge to constitutionality of a me | 1 | 1 |
Hopster v. Burgesongreen1 sentence2002This general rule also applies to the constitutionality of a statute."); Matter of A.R.R, 634 N.E.2d 786, 791 (Ind.Ct.App. 1994) (determining that it may not consider a challenge to the constitutionality of the standard for modification of custody in Indiana's paternity statute because this issue was not presented to the trial court and "[qluestions regarding the constitutionality of a statute must be raised in the trial court before the filing of the motion to correct errors"); Hopster v. Burgeson, 750 N.E.2d 841, 847-48 (Ind.Ct.App.2001) (observing that challenge to constitutionality of a me | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Cadle Co. II, Inc. v. Overton
green
1 sentence2012Id. | 1 | 2012–2012 |
Bivins v. State
green
2 sentences1995We have repeatedly affirmed the constitutionality of this standard, most recently in Bivins, 642 N.E.2d at 945-46 . f. 1995We have repeatedly affirmed the constitutionality of this standard, most recently in Bivins, 642 N.E.2d at 945-46 . f. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Piwowar v. Washington Lumber & Coal Co.
green
2 sentences1994The constitutionality of this rule was upheld in Piwowar v. Washington Lumber and Coal Co. (1980), Ind.App., 405 N.E.2d 576 . 1994The constitutionality of this rule was upheld in Piwowar v. Washington Lumber and Coal Co. (1980), Ind. App., 405 N.E.2d 576 . | 1 | 1994–1994 |
Hall v. State
green
1 sentence1990In Hall v. State (1990), Ind.App., 560 N.E.2d 561 , this court, in holding the "presumption" did not violate constitutional principles, described the presumption in IC 9-11-4-15(b) as permissive "in the sense that the [factfinder] may accept or reject it and is not compelled to find the presumed fact even if the defendant does not come forward with evidence to rebut the presumption." Hall at 562-68 . | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Lugar
green
1 sentence1980Williams, supra. Their arguments, however, as to the constitutionality of the immunity section of the Indiana Tort Claims Act were properly preserved for appeal; we will address them. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
City of Mishawaka v. Stewart
green
2 sentences1976Due process objections are premised upon our decision in City of Mishawaka v. Stewart, (1974) 261 Ind. 670 , 310 N.E.2d 65 . 1976Due process objections are premised upon our decision in City of Mishawaka v. Stewart, (1974) 261 Ind. 670 , 310 N.E.2d 65 . | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Clemons v. State
green
2 sentences1976Imel’s contentions that the waiver statute is void for vagueness, violative of due process, and an illegal delegation of powers were recently rejected by this court in Clemons v. State (1974), 162 Ind. App. 50 , 317 N.E.2d 859 , trf. den., cert. den., and need not be reconsidered here. 1976Imel’s contentions that the waiver statute is void for vagueness, violative of due process, and an illegal delegation of powers were recently rejected by this court in Clemons v. State (1974), 162 Ind. App. 50 , 317 N.E.2d 859 , trf. den., cert. den., and need not be reconsidered here. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Haas v. South Bend Community School Corporation
green
1 sentence1976In passing upon the constitutionality of such rule, our Supreme Court, at 524, 526 of 259 Ind., at 500 -501 of 289 N.E.2d, stated: “It is first argued that the rule is necessary to protect girls’ athletic programs. | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Dowell v. Talbot Paving Co.
green
1 sentence1895The constitutionality of the clause in the statute authorizing the recovery of a reasonable attorney’s fee in actions to foreclose assessment liens for street improvements was settled adversely to appellant in Dowell v. Talbot Paving Co., 138 Ind. 675 . | 1 | 1895–1895 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.