6 Nevada opinions name it 1 courts 1999–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Nevada courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Chambers v. Stategreen2 sentences2021See, e.g., Chambers v. State, 113 Nev. 974, 982-83, 944 P.2d 805, 810 (1997); Evans v. State, 112 Nev. 1172, 1190- 91, 926 P.2d 265, 277 (1996); Lord v. State, 107 Nev. 28, 40, 806 P.2d 548, 4 556 (1991), limited on other grounds by Summers v. State, 122 Nev. 1326, 1331, 148 P.3d 778, 782 (2006). 2021See, e.g., Chambers v. State, 113 Nev. 974, 982-83, 944 P.2d 805, 810 (1997); Evans v. State, 112 Nev. 1172, 1190- 91, 926 P.2d 265, 277 (1996); Lord v. State, 107 Nev. 28, 40, 806 P.2d 548, 4 556 (1991), limited on other grounds by Summers v. State, 122 Nev. 1326, 1331, 148 P.3d 778, 782 (2006). | 4 | 4 |
Evans v. Stategreen2 sentences2021See, e.g., Chambers v. State, 113 Nev. 974, 982-83, 944 P.2d 805, 810 (1997); Evans v. State, 112 Nev. 1172, 1190- 91, 926 P.2d 265, 277 (1996); Lord v. State, 107 Nev. 28, 40, 806 P.2d 548, 4 556 (1991), limited on other grounds by Summers v. State, 122 Nev. 1326, 1331, 148 P.3d 778, 782 (2006). 2021See, e.g., Chambers v. State, 113 Nev. 974, 982-83, 944 P.2d 805, 810 (1997); Evans v. State, 112 Nev. 1172, 1190- 91, 926 P.2d 265, 277 (1996); Lord v. State, 107 Nev. 28, 40, 806 P.2d 548, 4 556 (1991), limited on other grounds by Summers v. State, 122 Nev. 1326, 1331, 148 P.3d 778, 782 (2006). | 3 | 4 |
Summers v. Stategreen2 sentences2021See, e.g., Chambers v. State, 113 Nev. 974, 982-83, 944 P.2d 805, 810 (1997); Evans v. State, 112 Nev. 1172, 1190- 91, 926 P.2d 265, 277 (1996); Lord v. State, 107 Nev. 28, 40, 806 P.2d 548, 4 556 (1991), limited on other grounds by Summers v. State, 122 Nev. 1326, 1331, 148 P.3d 778, 782 (2006). 2021See, e.g., Chambers v. State, 113 Nev. 974, 982-83, 944 P.2d 805, 810 (1997); Evans v. State, 112 Nev. 1172, 1190- 91, 926 P.2d 265, 277 (1996); Lord v. State, 107 Nev. 28, 40, 806 P.2d 548, 4 556 (1991), limited on other grounds by Summers v. State, 122 Nev. 1326, 1331, 148 P.3d 778, 782 (2006). | 3 | 3 |
Lord v. Stategreen2 sentences2021See, e.g., Chambers v. State, 113 Nev. 974, 982-83, 944 P.2d 805, 810 (1997); Evans v. State, 112 Nev. 1172, 1190- 91, 926 P.2d 265, 277 (1996); Lord v. State, 107 Nev. 28, 40, 806 P.2d 548, 4 556 (1991), limited on other grounds by Summers v. State, 122 Nev. 1326, 1331, 148 P.3d 778, 782 (2006). 2021See, e.g., Chambers v. State, 113 Nev. 974, 982-83, 944 P.2d 805, 810 (1997); Evans v. State, 112 Nev. 1172, 1190- 91, 926 P.2d 265, 277 (1996); Lord v. State, 107 Nev. 28, 40, 806 P.2d 548, 4 556 (1991), limited on other grounds by Summers v. State, 122 Nev. 1326, 1331, 148 P.3d 778, 782 (2006). | 3 | 3 |
Bollinger v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Stat., ch. 467, §§ 1-3, at 1490-91. [26] Rogers v. State, 101 Nev. 457, 469 , 705 P.2d 664, 672 (1985). [27] Id. [28] See, e.g., Bollinger v. State, 111 Nev. 1110 , 1115 & n. 2, 901 P.2d 671 , 674 & n. 2 (1995) (upholding the constitutionality of the instruction particularly where [as here] the jury received additional instruction on the State's burden of proof and the presumption of innocence). [1] Tanksley v. State, 113 Nev. 997, 1001 , 946 P.2d 148, 150 (1997) (quoting United States v. Flewitt, 874 F.2d 669, 674 (9th Cir.1989)). [2] Tanksley, 113 Nev. at 1001 , 946 P.2d at 150 (quoting Lyon 2001Stat., ch. 467, §§ 1-3, at 1490-91. [26] Rogers v. State, 101 Nev. 457, 469 , 705 P.2d 664, 672 (1985). [27] Id. [28] See, e.g., Bollinger v. State, 111 Nev. 1110 , 1115 & n. 2, 901 P.2d 671 , 674 & n. 2 (1995) (upholding the constitutionality of the instruction particularly where [as here] the jury received additional instruction on the State's burden of proof and the presumption of innocence). [1] Tanksley v. State, 113 Nev. 997, 1001 , 946 P.2d 148, 150 (1997) (quoting United States v. Flewitt, 874 F.2d 669, 674 (9th Cir.1989)). [2] Tanksley, 113 Nev. at 1001 , 946 P.2d at 150 (quoting Lyon | 1 | 2 |
Garcia v. Stategreen2 sentences2020See Garcia v. State, 121 Nev. 327, 340 & n.26, 113 P.3d 836, 844 & n.26 (2005) (collecting cases), modified on other grounds by Mendoza v. State, 122 Nev. 267, 130 P.3d 176 (2006). 2020See Garcia v. State, 121 Nev. 327, 340 & n.26, 113 P.3d 836, 844 & n.26 (2005) (collecting cases), modified on other grounds by Mendoza v. State, 122 Nev. 267, 130 P.3d 176 (2006). | 1 | 1 |
Mendoza v. Stategreen2 sentences2020See Garcia v. State, 121 Nev. 327, 340 & n.26, 113 P.3d 836, 844 & n.26 (2005) (collecting cases), modified on other grounds by Mendoza v. State, 122 Nev. 267, 130 P.3d 176 (2006). 2020See Garcia v. State, 121 Nev. 327, 340 & n.26, 113 P.3d 836, 844 & n.26 (2005) (collecting cases), modified on other grounds by Mendoza v. State, 122 Nev. 267, 130 P.3d 176 (2006). | 1 | 1 |
Tanksley v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Stat., ch. 467, §§ 1-3, at 1490-91. [26] Rogers v. State, 101 Nev. 457, 469 , 705 P.2d 664, 672 (1985). [27] Id. [28] See, e.g., Bollinger v. State, 111 Nev. 1110 , 1115 & n. 2, 901 P.2d 671 , 674 & n. 2 (1995) (upholding the constitutionality of the instruction particularly where [as here] the jury received additional instruction on the State's burden of proof and the presumption of innocence). [1] Tanksley v. State, 113 Nev. 997, 1001 , 946 P.2d 148, 150 (1997) (quoting United States v. Flewitt, 874 F.2d 669, 674 (9th Cir.1989)). [2] Tanksley, 113 Nev. at 1001 , 946 P.2d at 150 (quoting Lyon 2001Stat., ch. 467, §§ 1-3, at 1490-91. [26] Rogers v. State, 101 Nev. 457, 469 , 705 P.2d 664, 672 (1985). [27] Id. [28] See, e.g., Bollinger v. State, 111 Nev. 1110 , 1115 & n. 2, 901 P.2d 671 , 674 & n. 2 (1995) (upholding the constitutionality of the instruction particularly where [as here] the jury received additional instruction on the State's burden of proof and the presumption of innocence). [1] Tanksley v. State, 113 Nev. 997, 1001 , 946 P.2d 148, 150 (1997) (quoting United States v. Flewitt, 874 F.2d 669, 674 (9th Cir.1989)). [2] Tanksley, 113 Nev. at 1001 , 946 P.2d at 150 (quoting Lyon | 1 | 1 |
United States v. C. Scott Flewitt, and B. Todd Flewittgreen1 sentence2001Stat., ch. 467, §§ 1-3, at 1490-91. [26] Rogers v. State, 101 Nev. 457, 469 , 705 P.2d 664, 672 (1985). [27] Id. [28] See, e.g., Bollinger v. State, 111 Nev. 1110 , 1115 & n. 2, 901 P.2d 671 , 674 & n. 2 (1995) (upholding the constitutionality of the instruction particularly where [as here] the jury received additional instruction on the State's burden of proof and the presumption of innocence). [1] Tanksley v. State, 113 Nev. 997, 1001 , 946 P.2d 148, 150 (1997) (quoting United States v. Flewitt, 874 F.2d 669, 674 (9th Cir.1989)). [2] Tanksley, 113 Nev. at 1001 , 946 P.2d at 150 (quoting Lyon | 1 | 1 |
Rogers v. Stategreen2 sentences2001Stat., ch. 467, §§ 1-3, at 1490-91. [26] Rogers v. State, 101 Nev. 457, 469 , 705 P.2d 664, 672 (1985). [27] Id. [28] See, e.g., Bollinger v. State, 111 Nev. 1110 , 1115 & n. 2, 901 P.2d 671 , 674 & n. 2 (1995) (upholding the constitutionality of the instruction particularly where [as here] the jury received additional instruction on the State's burden of proof and the presumption of innocence). [1] Tanksley v. State, 113 Nev. 997, 1001 , 946 P.2d 148, 150 (1997) (quoting United States v. Flewitt, 874 F.2d 669, 674 (9th Cir.1989)). [2] Tanksley, 113 Nev. at 1001 , 946 P.2d at 150 (quoting Lyon 2001Stat., ch. 467, §§ 1-3, at 1490-91. [26] Rogers v. State, 101 Nev. 457, 469 , 705 P.2d 664, 672 (1985). [27] Id. [28] See, e.g., Bollinger v. State, 111 Nev. 1110 , 1115 & n. 2, 901 P.2d 671 , 674 & n. 2 (1995) (upholding the constitutionality of the instruction particularly where [as here] the jury received additional instruction on the State's burden of proof and the presumption of innocence). [1] Tanksley v. State, 113 Nev. 997, 1001 , 946 P.2d 148, 150 (1997) (quoting United States v. Flewitt, 874 F.2d 669, 674 (9th Cir.1989)). [2] Tanksley, 113 Nev. at 1001 , 946 P.2d at 150 (quoting Lyon | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Nevada. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Alexander Stewart v. Robert Corbin
green
1 sentence2001Stat., ch. 467, §§ 1-3, at 1490-91. [26] Rogers v. State, 101 Nev. 457, 469 , 705 P.2d 664, 672 (1985). [27] Id. [28] See, e.g., Bollinger v. State, 111 Nev. 1110 , 1115 & n. 2, 901 P.2d 671 , 674 & n. 2 (1995) (upholding the constitutionality of the instruction particularly where [as here] the jury received additional instruction on the State's burden of proof and the presumption of innocence). [1] Tanksley v. State, 113 Nev. 997, 1001 , 946 P.2d 148, 150 (1997) (quoting United States v. Flewitt, 874 F.2d 669, 674 (9th Cir.1989)). [2] Tanksley, 113 Nev. at 1001 , 946 P.2d at 150 (quoting Lyon | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Lyons v. State
green
2 sentences2001Stat., ch. 467, §§ 1-3, at 1490-91. [26] Rogers v. State, 101 Nev. 457, 469 , 705 P.2d 664, 672 (1985). [27] Id. [28] See, e.g., Bollinger v. State, 111 Nev. 1110 , 1115 & n. 2, 901 P.2d 671 , 674 & n. 2 (1995) (upholding the constitutionality of the instruction particularly where [as here] the jury received additional instruction on the State's burden of proof and the presumption of innocence). [1] Tanksley v. State, 113 Nev. 997, 1001 , 946 P.2d 148, 150 (1997) (quoting United States v. Flewitt, 874 F.2d 669, 674 (9th Cir.1989)). [2] Tanksley, 113 Nev. at 1001 , 946 P.2d at 150 (quoting Lyon 2001Stat., ch. 467, §§ 1-3, at 1490-91. [26] Rogers v. State, 101 Nev. 457, 469 , 705 P.2d 664, 672 (1985). [27] Id. [28] See, e.g., Bollinger v. State, 111 Nev. 1110 , 1115 & n. 2, 901 P.2d 671 , 674 & n. 2 (1995) (upholding the constitutionality of the instruction particularly where [as here] the jury received additional instruction on the State's burden of proof and the presumption of innocence). [1] Tanksley v. State, 113 Nev. 997, 1001 , 946 P.2d 148, 150 (1997) (quoting United States v. Flewitt, 874 F.2d 669, 674 (9th Cir.1989)). [2] Tanksley, 113 Nev. at 1001 , 946 P.2d at 150 (quoting Lyon | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Quillen v. State
green
2 sentences1999See Chambers v. State, 113 Nev. 974 , 944 P.2d 805 (1997); Evans v. State, 112 Nev. 1172 , 926 P.2d 265 (1996); Quillen v. State, 112 Nev. 1369 , 929 P.2d 893 (1996); Bollinger v. State, 111 Nev. 1110 , 901 P.2d 671 (1995). 1999See Chambers v. State, 113 Nev. 974 , 944 P.2d 805 (1997); Evans v. State, 112 Nev. 1172 , 926 P.2d 265 (1996); Quillen v. State, 112 Nev. 1369 , 929 P.2d 893 (1996); Bollinger v. State, 111 Nev. 1110 , 901 P.2d 671 (1995). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.