constitutionality rule in Arizona

11 Arizona opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2019 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Arizona courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

Case	Followed	Cited
Conant v. Whitneygreen arizctapp · 1997 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019 1 sentence 2019Conant v. Whitney, 190 Ariz. 290, 293 (App. 1997). 5 AMSDEN v. BWCDD Decision of the Court ¶10 Salladay bars Amsden’s claim.	1	1
Greenwood v. Stategreen arizctapp · 2008 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009 2 sentences 2009Greenwood v. State, 217 Ariz. 438, 442-43, ¶ 16 , 175 P.3d 687, 691-92 (2008). 205 “We may not, however, construe an immunity provision so narrowly as to abrogate the legislature’s grant of immunity.” Id. at ¶ 16. ¶ 10 In Clouse, our supreme court examined the constitutionality of the immunity granted by A.R.S. § 12-820.02(A)(1). 199 Ariz. at 197, ¶ 1 , 16 P.3d at 758 . 2009Greenwood v. State, 217 Ariz. 438, 442-43, ¶ 16 , 175 P.3d 687, 691-92 (2008). 205 “We may not, however, construe an immunity provision so narrowly as to abrogate the legislature’s grant of immunity.” Id. at ¶ 16. ¶ 10 In Clouse, our supreme court examined the constitutionality of the immunity granted by A.R.S. § 12-820.02(A)(1). 199 Ariz. at 197, ¶ 1 , 16 P.3d at 758 .	1	1
Clouse Ex Rel. Clouse v. Stategreen ariz · 2001 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009 2 sentences 2009Greenwood v. State, 217 Ariz. 438, 442-43, ¶ 16 , 175 P.3d 687, 691-92 (2008). 205 “We may not, however, construe an immunity provision so narrowly as to abrogate the legislature’s grant of immunity.” Id. at ¶ 16. ¶ 10 In Clouse, our supreme court examined the constitutionality of the immunity granted by A.R.S. § 12-820.02(A)(1). 199 Ariz. at 197, ¶ 1 , 16 P.3d at 758 . 2009Greenwood v. State, 217 Ariz. 438, 442-43, ¶ 16 , 175 P.3d 687, 691-92 (2008). 205 “We may not, however, construe an immunity provision so narrowly as to abrogate the legislature’s grant of immunity.” Id. at ¶ 16. ¶ 10 In Clouse, our supreme court examined the constitutionality of the immunity granted by A.R.S. § 12-820.02(A)(1). 199 Ariz. at 197, ¶ 1 , 16 P.3d at 758 .	1	1
In Re Cesar R.green arizctapp · 1999 · cited in 1 Arizona opinions naming this issue, 2000–2000 2 sentences 2000Rep. at 37, ¶ 6 , 197 Ariz. at 439, ¶ 6 , 4 P.3d at 982, ¶ 6 . 2000Rep. at 37, ¶ 6 , 197 Ariz. at 439, ¶ 6 , 4 P.3d at 982, ¶ 6 .	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Arizona. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (13)

Case	Cited	Years
State of Wisconsin Public Intervenor v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources green wis · 1983 2 sentences 1989The public intervenor therefore has standing to challenge the constitutionality of NR 345.” 115 Wis.2d at 46 , 339 N.W.2d at 332 . 1989The public intervenor therefore has standing to challenge the constitutionality of NR 345.” 115 Wis.2d at 46 , 339 N.W.2d at 332 .	1	1989–1989
Thomas F. McInerney v. Louis Berman and Francis X. Bellotti green ca1 · 1980 1 sentence 1982McInerney v. Berman, 621 F.2d 20 (1st Cir.1980).	1	1982–1982
State v. Goldsmith green ariz · 1975 2 sentences 1980State v. Goldsmith, 112 Ariz. 399 , 542 P.2d 1098 (1976); State v. Cook, 115 Ariz. 146 , 564 P.2d 97 (App.1977); State v. Camino, 118 Ariz. 89 , 574 P.2d 1308 (App. 1977). 1980State v. Goldsmith, 112 Ariz. 399 , 542 P.2d 1098 (1976); State v. Cook, 115 Ariz. 146 , 564 P.2d 97 (App.1977); State v. Camino, 118 Ariz. 89 , 574 P.2d 1308 (App. 1977).	1	1980–1980
State v. Camino green arizctapp · 1977 2 sentences 1980State v. Goldsmith, 112 Ariz. 399 , 542 P.2d 1098 (1976); State v. Cook, 115 Ariz. 146 , 564 P.2d 97 (App.1977); State v. Camino, 118 Ariz. 89 , 574 P.2d 1308 (App. 1977). 1980State v. Goldsmith, 112 Ariz. 399 , 542 P.2d 1098 (1976); State v. Cook, 115 Ariz. 146 , 564 P.2d 97 (App.1977); State v. Camino, 118 Ariz. 89 , 574 P.2d 1308 (App. 1977).	1	1980–1980
State v. Cook green arizctapp · 1977 2 sentences 1980State v. Goldsmith, 112 Ariz. 399 , 542 P.2d 1098 (1976); State v. Cook, 115 Ariz. 146 , 564 P.2d 97 (App.1977); State v. Camino, 118 Ariz. 89 , 574 P.2d 1308 (App. 1977). 1980State v. Goldsmith, 112 Ariz. 399 , 542 P.2d 1098 (1976); State v. Cook, 115 Ariz. 146 , 564 P.2d 97 (App.1977); State v. Camino, 118 Ariz. 89 , 574 P.2d 1308 (App. 1977).	1	1980–1980
State v. Meek green arizctapp · 1969 2 sentences 1975While it is within the power of this Court to consider and rule upon the constitutionality of a rule adopted by the Arizona Supreme Court, see State v. Meek, 9 Ariz.App. 149 , 450 P.2d 115 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 847 , 90 S.Ct. 73 , 24 L.Ed.2d 98 (1969), we choose not to base our holding that appeal is still available to review probation revocation proceedings upon any theory that the denial of such appeal would be a violation of the provisions of Art. 2, § 24, of the Arizona Constitution. 1975While it is within the power of this Court to consider and rule upon the constitutionality of a rule adopted by the Arizona Supreme Court, see State v. Meek, 9 Ariz.App. 149 , 450 P.2d 115 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 847 , 90 S.Ct. 73 , 24 L.Ed.2d 98 (1969), we choose not to base our holding that appeal is still available to review probation revocation proceedings upon any theory that the denial of such appeal would be a violation of the provisions of Art. 2, § 24, of the Arizona Constitution.	1	1975–1975
Tennessee Valley Sand & Gravel Co. v. Crafton green scotus · 1969 1 sentence 1975While it is within the power of this Court to consider and rule upon the constitutionality of a rule adopted by the Arizona Supreme Court, see State v. Meek, 9 Ariz.App. 149 , 450 P.2d 115 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 847 , 90 S.Ct. 73 , 24 L.Ed.2d 98 (1969), we choose not to base our holding that appeal is still available to review probation revocation proceedings upon any theory that the denial of such appeal would be a violation of the provisions of Art. 2, § 24, of the Arizona Constitution.	1	1975–1975
Henderson v. Pryor neutral scotus · 1969 1 sentence 1975While it is within the power of this Court to consider and rule upon the constitutionality of a rule adopted by the Arizona Supreme Court, see State v. Meek, 9 Ariz.App. 149 , 450 P.2d 115 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 847 , 90 S.Ct. 73 , 24 L.Ed.2d 98 (1969), we choose not to base our holding that appeal is still available to review probation revocation proceedings upon any theory that the denial of such appeal would be a violation of the provisions of Art. 2, § 24, of the Arizona Constitution.	1	1975–1975
Powell v. National Savings & Trust Co. neutral scotus · 1969 1 sentence 1975While it is within the power of this Court to consider and rule upon the constitutionality of a rule adopted by the Arizona Supreme Court, see State v. Meek, 9 Ariz.App. 149 , 450 P.2d 115 (1969), cert. denied, 396 U.S. 847 , 90 S.Ct. 73 , 24 L.Ed.2d 98 (1969), we choose not to base our holding that appeal is still available to review probation revocation proceedings upon any theory that the denial of such appeal would be a violation of the provisions of Art. 2, § 24, of the Arizona Constitution.	1	1975–1975
United States v. Donald Lee Williams green ca4 · 1968 1 sentence 1971In United States v. Williams, 405 F.2d 14 (1968), the Fourth Circuit upheld the constitutionality of an instruction identical in import to the one at hand.	1	1971–1971
Marbury v. Madison green · 1803 2 sentences 1968This axiom of our law was clearly pointed out in that landmark case, Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137 , 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803): "Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument." The majority in effect holds that every appeal which attacks the constitutionality of a rule of criminal procedure could not be inquired into by this Court even though it might in 1968This axiom of our law was clearly pointed out in that landmark case, Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch 137 , 2 L.Ed. 60 (1803): "Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle, supposed to be essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the constitution is void; and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument." The majority in effect holds that every appeal which attacks the constitutionality of a rule of criminal procedure could not be inquired into by this Court even though it might in	1	1968–1968
State v. Meek neutral arizctapp · 1968 2 sentences 1968The constitutionality of this rule, prior to its modification, was challenged in State v. Meek, 8 Ariz.App. 261 , 445 P.2d 463 (1968), but Division One of this Court (majority opinion) held that it had no authority to rule upon the constitutionality of a rule promulgated by the Supreme Court. 1968The constitutionality of this rule, prior to its modification, was challenged in State v. Meek, 8 Ariz.App. 261 , 445 P.2d 463 (1968), but Division One of this Court (majority opinion) held that it had no authority to rule upon the constitutionality of a rule promulgated by the Supreme Court.	1	1968–1968
Heat Pump Equipment Co. v. Glen Alden Corp. green ariz · 1963 2 sentences 1966After the injury, defendant’s only contact was the presence of its products for sale in the state. 254 V The question presented, is whether these fatets will allow our trial court to exercise in .personam jurisdiction over the defendant.\,Rule 4(e) (2) allows Arizona courts tcTacquire personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant who “has caused an event to occur in this state out of which the claim which is the subject of the complaint arose.” The constitutionality of the rule has been upheld in Heat Pump Equipment Co. v. Glen Alden Corp., 93 Ariz. 361 , 380 P.2d 1016 . 1966After the injury, defendant’s only contact was the presence of its products for sale in the state. 254 V The question presented, is whether these fatets will allow our trial court to exercise in .personam jurisdiction over the defendant.\,Rule 4(e) (2) allows Arizona courts tcTacquire personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant who “has caused an event to occur in this state out of which the claim which is the subject of the complaint arose.” The constitutionality of the rule has been upheld in Heat Pump Equipment Co. v. Glen Alden Corp., 93 Ariz. 361 , 380 P.2d 1016 .	1	1966–1966

Where else courts name it

TX 46 (1975–2025) CA 44 (1939–2018) IL 40 (1919–2023) PA 40 (1911–2017) FL 34 (1971–2026) NY 31 (1923–2024) LA 24 (1942–2023) WA 22 (1972–2024) MN 22 (1960–2016) MO 15 (1878–2018) OH 13 (1935–2022) CO 12 (1981–2024) AZ 11 (1966–2019) CT 11 (1984–2017) TN 11 (1979–2022) MA 11 (1975–2008) IN 10 (1895–2012) IA 10 (1974–2025) MS 9 (1975–2010) UT 9 (1981–2022) NJ 9 (1964–1990) MD 9 (1962–2014) OR 8 (1958–2026) MI 8 (1975–2021) NC 8 (1915–2001) VA 7 (1980–2024) GA 7 (1944–2022) OK 7 (1973–2015) NV 6 (1999–2021) ID 6 (1976–1997) AL 5 (1976–2000) WI 4 (1980–2003) WV 4 (1965–1995) AK 4 (1969–2013) ND 4 (1984–2008) KS 4 (1975–2018) KY 3 (2004–2021) DC 3 (1981–2021) HI 3 (1930–1993) MT 3 (1973–2006) AR 2 (2001–2014) SC 2 (1952–1952) NE 2 (2002–2016) ME 2 (1980–2002)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check