Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
21 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1985–2026 6 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Harmelin v. Michigangreen2 sentences2022This Court and the Supreme Court have acknowledged that “the Eighth Amendment encompasses a narrow proportionality principle prohibiting ‘grossly disproportionate’ sentences.” State v. Stewart, 368 Md. 26, 31 (2002), quoting Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 997 (1991) (Kennedy, J., concurring). 2022In Stewart v. State, relying on Supreme Court precedent, we stated that “[t]he Eighth Amendment encompasses a narrow proportionality principle prohibiting ‘grossly disproportionate’ sentences[]” but that “successful challenges to the proportionality of a particular sentence are exceedingly rare.” 368 Md. 26, 31 , 791 A.2d 143, 146 (2002) (quoting Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 997 , 111 S. Ct. 2680, 2702 (1991) (Kennedy, J., concurring) and Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277 , 103 S. Ct. 3001 (1983)). | 5 | 8 |
State v. Stewartgreen2 sentences2022This Court and the Supreme Court have acknowledged that “the Eighth Amendment encompasses a narrow proportionality principle prohibiting ‘grossly disproportionate’ sentences.” State v. Stewart, 368 Md. 26, 31 (2002), quoting Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 997 (1991) (Kennedy, J., concurring). 2022In Stewart v. State, relying on Supreme Court precedent, we stated that “[t]he Eighth Amendment encompasses a narrow proportionality principle prohibiting ‘grossly disproportionate’ sentences[]” but that “successful challenges to the proportionality of a particular sentence are exceedingly rare.” 368 Md. 26, 31 , 791 A.2d 143, 146 (2002) (quoting Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 997 , 111 S. Ct. 2680, 2702 (1991) (Kennedy, J., concurring) and Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277 , 103 S. Ct. 3001 (1983)). | 4 | 8 |
State v. Davisgreen2 sentences2018See State v. Davis , 206 Ariz. 377 , 79 P.3d 64 , 74-75 (2003) ("Although this court normally will not consider the imposition of consecutive sentences in a proportionality inquiry, this case cries out for departure from that general rule"); Close v. People , 48 P.3d 528 , 540 n.6 (Colo. 2002) ("Our holding that consecutive crime of violence statute sentences are not reviewable in the aggregate in a proportionality review does not preclude an Eighth Amendment challenge to that cumulative sentence under the 'shocks the conscience' standard"). 2018See State v. Davis , 206 Ariz. 377 , 79 P.3d 64 , 74-75 (2003) ("Although this court normally will not consider the imposition of consecutive sentences in a proportionality inquiry, this case cries out for departure from that general rule"); Close v. People , 48 P.3d 528 , 540 n.6 (Colo. 2002) ("Our holding that consecutive crime of violence statute sentences are not reviewable in the aggregate in a proportionality review does not preclude an Eighth Amendment challenge to that cumulative sentence under the 'shocks the conscience' standard"). | 2 | 2 |
Thomas v. Stategreen2 sentences2005Because “the sentencing judge is ‘virtually always better informed of the particular circumstances,’ ” a reviewing court considering a proportionality challenge “should look to the seriousness of the conduct involved ... [and] any articulated purpose supporting the sentence.” Id. at 95 and 97, 634 A.2d 1 . 2005Because “the sentencing judge is ‘virtually always better informed of the particular circumstances,’ ” a reviewing court considering a proportionality challenge “should look to the seriousness of the conduct involved ... [and] any articulated purpose supporting the sentence.” Id. at 95 and 97, 634 A.2d 1 . | 1 | 6 |
Solem v. Helmred2 sentences2022In Stewart v. State, relying on Supreme Court precedent, we stated that “[t]he Eighth Amendment encompasses a narrow proportionality principle prohibiting ‘grossly disproportionate’ sentences[]” but that “successful challenges to the proportionality of a particular sentence are exceedingly rare.” 368 Md. 26, 31 , 791 A.2d 143, 146 (2002) (quoting Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 997 , 111 S. Ct. 2680, 2702 (1991) (Kennedy, J., concurring) and Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277 , 103 S. Ct. 3001 (1983)). 2022In Stewart v. State, relying on Supreme Court precedent, we stated that “[t]he Eighth Amendment encompasses a narrow proportionality principle prohibiting ‘grossly disproportionate’ sentences[]” but that “successful challenges to the proportionality of a particular sentence are exceedingly rare.” 368 Md. 26, 31 , 791 A.2d 143, 146 (2002) (quoting Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 997 , 111 S. Ct. 2680, 2702 (1991) (Kennedy, J., concurring) and Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277 , 103 S. Ct. 3001 (1983)). | 1 | 5 |
Close v. Peoplered1 sentence2018See State v. Davis , 206 Ariz. 377 , 79 P.3d 64 , 74-75 (2003) ("Although this court normally will not consider the imposition of consecutive sentences in a proportionality inquiry, this case cries out for departure from that general rule"); Close v. People , 48 P.3d 528 , 540 n.6 (Colo. 2002) ("Our holding that consecutive crime of violence statute sentences are not reviewable in the aggregate in a proportionality review does not preclude an Eighth Amendment challenge to that cumulative sentence under the 'shocks the conscience' standard"). | 1 | 1 |
State v. Bergergreen2 sentences2017Cir. 1988) (same); State v. Berger, 212 Ariz. 473 , 134 P.3d 378, 384 (2006) (affirming the imposition of 20 consecutive 10-year sentences for separate convictions for possession of child pornography and remarking that, “as a general rule, this court ‘will not consider the imposition of consecutive sentences in a proportionality inquiry .,..’”) (quoting State v. Davis, 206 Ariz. 377 , 79 P.3d 64, 74 (2003)); see also Pearson v. Ramos, 237 F.3d 881, 886 (7th Cir. 2001) (affirming the imposition of cumulative disciplinary sanctions *743 against a prisoner, opining that “it is wrong to treat stac 2017Cir. 1988) (same); State v. Berger, 212 Ariz. 473 , 134 P.3d 378, 384 (2006) (affirming the imposition of 20 consecutive 10-year sentences for separate convictions for possession of child pornography and remarking that, “as a general rule, this court ‘will not consider the imposition of consecutive sentences in a proportionality inquiry .,..’”) (quoting State v. Davis, 206 Ariz. 377 , 79 P.3d 64, 74 (2003)); see also Pearson v. Ramos, 237 F.3d 881, 886 (7th Cir. 2001) (affirming the imposition of cumulative disciplinary sanctions *743 against a prisoner, opining that “it is wrong to treat stac | 1 | 1 |
Alex Pearson v. Anthony Ramosgreen1 sentence2017Cir. 1988) (same); State v. Berger, 212 Ariz. 473 , 134 P.3d 378, 384 (2006) (affirming the imposition of 20 consecutive 10-year sentences for separate convictions for possession of child pornography and remarking that, “as a general rule, this court ‘will not consider the imposition of consecutive sentences in a proportionality inquiry .,..’”) (quoting State v. Davis, 206 Ariz. 377 , 79 P.3d 64, 74 (2003)); see also Pearson v. Ramos, 237 F.3d 881, 886 (7th Cir. 2001) (affirming the imposition of cumulative disciplinary sanctions *743 against a prisoner, opining that “it is wrong to treat stac | 1 | 1 |
State of Arizona v. Mark Noriki Kasicgreen2 sentences2017Noting that the defendant did not receive any single sentence longer than 15.75 years, and relying upon the “general rule” that the court will “not consider the imposition of consecutive sentences in the proportionality inquiry,” 10 the court found that “different considerations apply to consecutive term-of-years sentences based on multiple counts and multiple victims.” Id. at 415-16. 2017The “sentences, viewed individually and in the aggregate, further Arizona’s penological goals and thus reflect a rational legislative judgment, entitled to deference.” Id. at 416 (citation and quotation marks omitted). 11 Louisiana (2013): State v. Brown, 118 So.3d at 332 The defendant was convicted of one count of aggravated kidnapping, for which he was sentenced to life, and four counts of armed robbery, for which he was sentenced to four concurrent terms of 10 years. | 1 | 1 |
United States v. Certain Real Propertygreen1 sentence1995United States v. 11869 Westshore Drive, 848 F.Supp. 107, 111 (E.D.Mich.1994). | 1 | 1 |
Walker v. Stategreen2 sentences1993The Court of Appeals quoted with approval from this Court’s opinion in Walker v. State, 53 Md.App. 171, 193, 452 A.2d 1234 (1982), where Judge Moylan explained how we should review a proportionality challenge: As to excessiveness (proportionality), that can never be litigated in the abstract but must be assessed on a case-by-case basis. 1993The Court of Appeals quoted with approval from this Court’s opinion in Walker v. State, 53 Md.App. 171, 193, 452 A.2d 1234 (1982), where Judge Moylan explained how we should review a proportionality challenge: As to excessiveness (proportionality), that can never be litigated in the abstract but must be assessed on a case-by-case basis. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Harris v. State
green
1 sentence2026App. 612 , 657 (2021), aff’d, 479 Md. 84 (2022) (citing Stewart, 368 Md. at 31 ) (further citation omitted). | 1 | 2026–2026 |
Va. Dep't of Corr. v. Jordan
green
1 sentence2024P. 45(d)(3)(A)(iv) on the ground that the subpoena imposes an “undue burden[,]” the federal courts apply “[a] more demanding variant of the proportionality analysis . . . when determining whether . . . [the] subpoena . . . must be quashed or modified.” Id. (quoting Fed. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Brown
green
1 sentence2017The “sentences, viewed individually and in the aggregate, further Arizona’s penological goals and thus reflect a rational legislative judgment, entitled to deference.” Id. at 416 (citation and quotation marks omitted). 11 Louisiana (2013): State v. Brown, 118 So.3d at 332 The defendant was convicted of one count of aggravated kidnapping, for which he was sentenced to life, and four counts of armed robbery, for which he was sentenced to four concurrent terms of 10 years. | 1 | 2017–2017 |
State v. Bolden
green
2 sentences2006Excessive bail, excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishment are expressly prohibited by the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 3 The Eighth Amendment’s prohibitions have also been interpreted by the Supreme Court as encompassing a narrow proportionality principle, which forbids sentences “that are ‘grossly5 or ‘significantly5 disproportionate in length to the crime being punished.” State v. Bolden, 356 Md. 160, 165 , 737 A.2d 1086 (1999)(citing Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277, 287-88 , 103 S.Ct. 3001 , 77 L.Ed.2d 637 (1983)). 2006Excessive bail, excessive fines, and cruel and unusual punishment are expressly prohibited by the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 3 The Eighth Amendment’s prohibitions have also been interpreted by the Supreme Court as encompassing a narrow proportionality principle, which forbids sentences “that are ‘grossly5 or ‘significantly5 disproportionate in length to the crime being punished.” State v. Bolden, 356 Md. 160, 165 , 737 A.2d 1086 (1999)(citing Solem v. Helm, 463 U.S. 277, 287-88 , 103 S.Ct. 3001 , 77 L.Ed.2d 637 (1983)). | 1 | 2006–2006 |
City of Riverside v. Rivera
green
2 sentences2003In Riverside v. Rivera, 477 U.S. 561, 578 , 106 S.Ct. 2686 , 91 L.Ed.2d 466 (1986), for example, the Supreme Court held that, “[a] rule of proportionality would make it difficult, if not impossible, for individuals with meritorious ... claims but relatively small potential damages to obtain redress from the courts.” Id. at 578 , 106 S.Ct. 2686 . 2003In Riverside v. Rivera, 477 U.S. 561, 578 , 106 S.Ct. 2686 , 91 L.Ed.2d 466 (1986), for example, the Supreme Court held that, “[a] rule of proportionality would make it difficult, if not impossible, for individuals with meritorious ... claims but relatively small potential damages to obtain redress from the courts.” Id. at 578 , 106 S.Ct. 2686 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
United States v. Halper
red
2 sentences1995Borromeo held that the proportionality analysis espoused in United States v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435 , 109 S.Ct. 1892 , 104 L.Ed.2d 487 (1989), does not apply to civil forfeiture actions where the property forfeited was an instrument of the crime. 1995Borromeo held that the proportionality analysis espoused in United States v. Halper, 490 U.S. 435 , 109 S.Ct. 1892 , 104 L.Ed.2d 487 (1989), does not apply to civil forfeiture actions where the property forfeited was an instrument of the crime. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Melahn v. Florida
neutral
1 sentence1995After that decision was filed, the Supreme Court decided Austin v. U.S., 506 U.S. 1074 , 113 S.Ct. 1036 , 122 L.Ed.2d 347 (1993). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
McNeil v. United States
green
1 sentence1995After that decision was filed, the Supreme Court decided Austin v. U.S., 506 U.S. 1074 , 113 S.Ct. 1036 , 122 L.Ed.2d 347 (1993). | 1 | 1995–1995 |
United States v. James Alvin Rhodes, A/K/A Mickey Rhodes, United States of America v. Garvey Martin Cheek, Jr.
green
1 sentence1987A sentence of seventy-five years without parole was imposed on a thirty-eight year old drug dealer under a federal statute and sustained against eighth amendment attack in the post Helm case of United States v. Rhodes, 779 F.2d 1019 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 2916 , 91 L.Ed.2d 545 (1986). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
State v. Vance
green
1 sentence1987Nevertheless, the West Virginia court held: We decline to apply the proportionality doctrine in the present case, since we believe the crime of breaking and entering carries the potentiality of violence and danger to life as well as to property. [ 262 S.E.2d at 432 .] If life with parole is proportionate following the third conviction for the crimes involved in Griffin and in Vance , it would seem that life without parole is proportionate for a fourth housebreaking conviction, following three separate and unsuccessful attempts at rehabilitation through incarceration. | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Dewey Hart v. Ira M. Coiner, Warden of the West Virginia State Penitentiary
green
1 sentence1987In order to demonstrate that courts “can identify and apply objective criteria that reflect constitutional standards of punishment and minimize the risk of judicial subjectivity,” the dissent pointed out that its suggested objective factors had been applied in a line of decisions in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit led by Hart v. Coiner, 483 F.2d 136 (1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 983 , 94 S.Ct. 1577 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Legum v. New York
green
1 sentence1987In order to demonstrate that courts “can identify and apply objective criteria that reflect constitutional standards of punishment and minimize the risk of judicial subjectivity,” the dissent pointed out that its suggested objective factors had been applied in a line of decisions in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit led by Hart v. Coiner, 483 F.2d 136 (1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 983 , 94 S.Ct. 1577 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Coiner v. Hart
green
1 sentence1987In order to demonstrate that courts “can identify and apply objective criteria that reflect constitutional standards of punishment and minimize the risk of judicial subjectivity,” the dissent pointed out that its suggested objective factors had been applied in a line of decisions in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit led by Hart v. Coiner, 483 F.2d 136 (1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 983 , 94 S.Ct. 1577 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Arnold v. Tiffany
green
1 sentence1987In order to demonstrate that courts “can identify and apply objective criteria that reflect constitutional standards of punishment and minimize the risk of judicial subjectivity,” the dissent pointed out that its suggested objective factors had been applied in a line of decisions in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit led by Hart v. Coiner, 483 F.2d 136 (1973), cert. denied, 415 U.S. 983 , 94 S.Ct. 1577 , 39 L.Ed.2d 881 (1974). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Rummel v. Estelle
green
2 sentences1987Writing for the dissenters Justice Powell said that the eighth amendment included a proportionality principle, the violation of which could be determined by objective factors including “(i) the nature of the offense ... (ii) the sentence imposed for commission of the same crime in other jurisdictions ... and (iii) the sentence imposed upon other criminals in the same jurisdiction.” Rummel v. Estelle, supra, 445 U.S. at 295 , 100 S.Ct. at 1150 . 1987Writing for the dissenters Justice Powell said that the eighth amendment included a proportionality principle, the violation of which could be determined by objective factors including “(i) the nature of the offense ... (ii) the sentence imposed for commission of the same crime in other jurisdictions ... and (iii) the sentence imposed upon other criminals in the same jurisdiction.” Rummel v. Estelle, supra, 445 U.S. at 295 , 100 S.Ct. at 1150 . | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Rubio v. United States
green
1 sentence1987A sentence of seventy-five years without parole was imposed on a thirty-eight year old drug dealer under a federal statute and sustained against eighth amendment attack in the post Helm case of United States v. Rhodes, 779 F.2d 1019 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 2916 , 91 L.Ed.2d 545 (1986). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
Rhodes v. United States
green
1 sentence1987A sentence of seventy-five years without parole was imposed on a thirty-eight year old drug dealer under a federal statute and sustained against eighth amendment attack in the post Helm case of United States v. Rhodes, 779 F.2d 1019 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 2916 , 91 L.Ed.2d 545 (1986). | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| State v. Duffel green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Seely v. State green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Jerry Carlo Moreno v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, and Jim Mattox, Attorney General of the State of Texas
green
1 sentence1985Moreno v. Estelle, 717 F.2d 171 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2353 , 80 L.Ed.2d 826 (1984), holding that a proportionality analysis was not necessary and that life imprisonment was not unconstitutional for a conviction of aggravated assault in light of two previous felony convictions; Tombrello v. State, 421 So.2d 1319 (Ala.Crim.App.1982), holding that life imprisonment is not cruel and unusual punishment for a first degree burglary conviction after previous convictions; Arizona v. Noriega, 142 Ariz. 474 , 690 P.2d 775 (1984), holding, after a Solem proportionality review, | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| State v. Noriega green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| State v. Archibeque green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Tombrello v. State green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Mock v. United States green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Moreno v. McKaskle
green
1 sentence1985Moreno v. Estelle, 717 F.2d 171 (5th Cir.1983), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 104 S.Ct. 2353 , 80 L.Ed.2d 826 (1984), holding that a proportionality analysis was not necessary and that life imprisonment was not unconstitutional for a conviction of aggravated assault in light of two previous felony convictions; Tombrello v. State, 421 So.2d 1319 (Ala.Crim.App.1982), holding that life imprisonment is not cruel and unusual punishment for a first degree burglary conviction after previous convictions; Arizona v. Noriega, 142 Ariz. 474 , 690 P.2d 775 (1984), holding, after a Solem proportionality review, | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.